 |
EnMasse This place is all that is left.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Raos volatilis vir

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 5480 Location: Petropolis
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Speaking of stunning visuals in movies (I'd've thought 2012 was a write off, but I might see it for the aesthetics), I really want to see Avatar. Has anybody seen it yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just saw Avatar. Amazingly beautiful, great in 3d. Has a staring cameo for Canadian mining company, including hired murdering mercenaries. The pover all plot makes the film more of a popcorn blockbuster than a political allegory, and some of the dialogue isn't that well scripted. But if you are going to make an action sci-fi flic with fancy graphics, this film at least was made with a decent underlying message and theme. There are some almost moving scenes, never really peaked for me (but I never got a peak out of Titanic, particularly when Jack went under the water so I'm not a good 'judge' of how these things are received broadly).
In the end I would highly recommend it as a piece of entertainment. Well worth the effort to see it in theatres because it is visually stunning on the big screen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legless_Marine Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:12 pm Post subject: Hancock (2008) |
|
|
Just saw Hancock last night, a light action movie from 2008.
This movie is a brilliant take on the superhero theme with Will Smith as an alcoholic, impulsive, and shiftless version of Superman. He's got super strength, invulnerability, flight, and can hardly see, or fly straight.
The opening sequence shows him scraping his hungover self off of a park bench to help stop criminals fleeing a robbery in a car. He grabs a bottle of liquor, and proceeds to do drunken-flying across the city, careening through billboards, and inadvertently causing car accidents. By the time he's apprehended and neutralized the baddies, he's caused 9 million dollars in accidental damage to the city.
I won't say much more about the movie, except that it's fun, has a few delightful surprises, and is ultimately satisfying.
Highly recommended fun-flick. _________________ Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ronb mocker

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 2627 Location: Blackroof country, no gold pavement, tired starling
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Read? Meh. Why not just watch the Academy Award winning short film of Occurance at Owl Creek, later aired as a Twilight Zone episode? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legless_Marine Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:10 pm Post subject: "My dinner with Andre" (1981) |
|
|
"My dinner with Andre" revolves around a dinner conversation between two wanna-be new York playrights.
Andre dominates the conversation, boorishly monologuing about his experiences with new age navel gazing in the forest, and dabblings in eastern mysticism. The other occasionally interjects with meekly delivered agreement or disagreement, but offers little substance. Both of them seem creepily obsessed with Nazi related themes.
I found myself feeling bad for both of these characters. I felt bad for myself for watching. It just felt bad.
This film was a huge avant-garde hit in 1981. Perhaps in the context of that time, the ideas and conversation within it were seen as relevant, enlightening, or interesting.
Watching this film from the 21st century, however, it seems irrelevant and tiresome. _________________ Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm somewhat ambivalent about Wallace Shawn. He seems more like a cinematic conversation-piece than a genuine personality. I guess he's been adequate enough in some of the roles I've seen him in, but I can't escape the suspicion that he's gotten to where he is mostly by being the son of a famous editor, and being well-connected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thwap Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4564 Location: Hamilton
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, i saw that "Avatar" movie. Fun to watch.
But it was also really nice to see such an obvious attack on US-imperialism.
There was nothing subtle about it. I recognize the irony of a blockbuster high-tech Hollywood movie criticizing corporate and militarist values, but i think putting something like this into the psyche of the population as a whole will produce serious pay-offs in the long-run.
Having the cigar-chomping marine col. yammering about "fighting terror with terror" in response to the natives' rallying to defend their planet, and having another character describe the massive bomb being dropped on the sacred site as "Shock and Awe" was such a clear stab at the bush II regime.
And the whole thing, about how the natives had to move (or be destroyed) so that the alien corporation could get at the mineral resources beneath their village, that's the whole system right there.
I remember how strongly "Star Wars" affected me as a youngster. I gotta think there were some impressionable youngsters in the audience who got the adrenalin rush from the special-effects action but ALSO took away this more coherent anti-corporate plunder anti-militarism message. _________________ Man! I hate them fancy-lads! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I'm somewhat ambivalent about Wallace Shawn. He seems more like a cinematic conversation-piece than a genuine personality. |
Dude, are you dissing The Designated Mourner? I love that play. Almost as good as The Accidental Death of an Anarchist by Dario Fo.
I figure any playwright who can get the British vice squad on his tail has to be doing something right.
Besides, Shawn was the best Prime Minister Canada ever had.
| Quote: | | I gotta think there were some impressionable youngsters in the audience who got the adrenalin rush from the special-effects action but ALSO took away this more coherent anti-corporate plunder anti-militarism message. |
Not to be too much of a prick, but I hope these same kids leave the whole nobel savage crap that gets peddled in the film back in the 1800s where it belongs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Avatar is a much better analogy for any capitalist extractive imperialism, and I would not hesitate to make allusions to Canadian mining companies who are probably a more apt comparison than George Bush's Iraq war. This week another anti-mining activist was killed by mercenaries hired by Canadian mining companies - this time in El Salvador.
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2266/74/
Though it is trivial to say "this is more like this than that" - so I am not debating, but merely pointing out that Canada has such an ugly and imperialist character in the world that we should not get caught up to forget this to make allusions to George Bush. Bush is a character of imperialism, and as an absolute character he can easily be taken to distract to focus on the character rather than the imperialism. Imperialists come in many shapes and forms, and Canadian mining companies, in their disregard for local communities, the environment, and their willingness to kill for profit, are another character of imperialism.
My friend and colleague is preparing a paper on Canadian imperialism, and went to Avatar with me. Every time the mining company executive spoke, it sounded more like the Canadian miner, backed by the avarice of international imperial capital, than anything else I could recall. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raos volatilis vir

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 5480 Location: Petropolis
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Just saw Avatar last night, and I'll add my voice to the chorus of how awesome the social commentary is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Dude, are you dissing The Designated Mourner? I love that play. Almost as good as The Accidental Death of an Anarchist by Dario Fo.
I figure any playwright who can get the British vice squad on his tail has to be doing something right.
Besides, Shawn was the best Prime Minister Canada ever had.
|
You can consider my comments on Wallace Shawn to be more-or-less retracted, since it occured to me after I wrote them that he's mostly a playwright, and I have no experience whatsoever of his plays. I still don't quite get why he's casted in films, besides that other theatre people know and like him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shawn's plays are pretty good if you like Edward Albee. Shawn's a bit more brainy, maybe not quite as moving. You could successfully accuse Shawn of liberal guilt more than you could Albee.
| Quote: | | I still don't quite get why he's casted in films, besides that other theatre people know and like him. |
You don't think he's funny? Most folks I've talked to about The Princess Bride single him out as a highlight. And I thought he was alright in the more demanding Vanya on 42nd Street, but I haven't seen that one in years.
No figuring taste, eh? Especially in comedy. For example, I don't get why people think Alec Baldwin is funny. Just don't see it. But all those awards and SNL appearances tell me different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | You don't think he's funny? Most folks I've talked to about The Princess Bride single him out as a highlight. |
I think I'm setting myself up for an EnMasse tar-and-feathering here, but I actually have a rather low regard for TPB. I watched it for the first time last spring, and I just didn't see what all the hoopla was about. Then again, I think I had allowed myself to be misled about the premise of the film. Someone once told me, long before I'd seen it, that the line about "a land war in Asia" being the one thing you don't want was actually the grandfather editorializing, via one of the characters in the story he was telling. I extrapolated from this that the whole story is improvised by the grandfather, and so is filled with wildly incongruous details that he throws in to entertain his grandson. I had visions of the story taking place in a land where purple bananas grow from gigantic trees on snowy mountaintops(or something along those lines). So my actual screening of it was a tad underwhelming.
But yes, Wallace Shawn was amusing. As he was in that Eddie Murphy Haunted Mansion thing, which is kind of my reference point for his cinematic appearances. Prick Up Your Ears is obviously much more high-brow, but I wasn't conscious of who he was when I saw it.
| Quote: | Shawn's plays are pretty good if you like Edward Albee. Shawn's a bit more brainy, maybe not quite as moving. You could successfully accuse Shawn of liberal guilt more than you could Albee.
|
I liked Virginia Woolf quite a bit, but The Zoo Story struck me as a bit too much like a high-school creative writing assignment. Possibly because it became one of the templates for such assignments.
| Quote: | | No figuring taste, eh? Especially in comedy. For example, I don't get why people think Alec Baldwin is funny. Just don't see it. But all those awards and SNL appearances tell me different. |
I don't watch enough SNL to have seen Baldwin on, nor have I ever seen 30 Rock. As far as I'm concerned, the funniest line he ever delivered was "Second prize is a...", which, interestingly enough, now makes the rounds as sort of a higher brow's version of an SNL catchphrase. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I think I'm setting myself up for an EnMasse tar-and-feathering here, but I actually have a rather low regard for TPB. |
Naw, we'll save the tar and feathers for when you get all grumpy about Withnail & I. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Naw, we'll save the tar and feathers for when you get all grumpy about Withnail & I. |
Well, I haven't seen that since it first came out. All I can recall is the disgusting sandwich, the uncomfortable weekend with the uncle, and the 60s being over at the end. Oh, and one guy asking the other guy if he wanted coffee or something. I seem to remember thinking it was good, so I guess I'm saved from the mob. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cartman Beyond cuddly

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8676 Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I watched Star Trek last week. What a total fucking piece of peanut-filled dog shit. That was truly the worst movie I have ever watched in my life. I want my money back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Peanut-filled dog shit? Where does that come from? I hope you haven't been feeding your dogs weird stuff ...
I was going to see Avatar today but (and I really should have been able to predict this) it was sold out for hours and hours. So I went to the bookstore instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maestro Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 2403 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
An interesting political film, "In The Loop". The story of a minor minister in the UK goverment who gives an unthinking answer to a question at the tail end of an interview. The question had nothing to do with his ministry, and the answer was extremely vague.
However, the prime minister's chief of staff (not explicitly stated in the movie, but someone who has the power to appoint and un-appoint) hears the interview and thinks the minister has overstepped the bounds.
The minister's comment is also heard in the US, where a particular faction in the State Department thinks they can use it to bolster their own agenda.
This leads to 'complications' (to put it mildly), and a lot of backing and forthing between various factions and the lower level staff who work for the higher ups.
An excellent view of what goes on behind the curtain, as well as a wicked commentary on how things are decided.
Warning! The language is fierce and unrelenting. More profanity per second than any movie I've ever seen. _________________ On the wilds of the Drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
academentia Member
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you enjoyed In the Loop, there's a related but not-of-the-same storyline TV series called "The Thick of It" -- many of the same characters, and the same interesting, behind-the-curtain and full of swearing style.
There are three 'seasons' out now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maestro Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 2403 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| academentia wrote: | If you enjoyed In the Loop, there's a related but not-of-the-same storyline TV series called "The Thick of It" -- many of the same characters, and the same interesting, behind-the-curtain and full of swearing style.
There are three 'seasons' out now. |
I looked it up (The Thick Of It) and Wikipedia says the movie was a spin-off of the tv show. It worked as a movie, so now I'm interested in seeing the tv show. Thanks, academentia. _________________ On the wilds of the Drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rufus Polson Purple Library Guy
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3483 Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| voice of the damned wrote: | | Quote: | | You don't think he's funny? Most folks I've talked to about The Princess Bride single him out as a highlight. |
I think I'm setting myself up for an EnMasse tar-and-feathering here, but I actually have a rather low regard for TPB. |
Hooot tar! Get yer hot tar 'n downy feathers right here! Step right up!
We gots ta tar an' feather this here critter right away, so get it while it's bubblin'!
The Princess Bride has more well-turned patter and beautifully timed comic business per square inch than any other movie I've ever seen. It does everything that seems like it's easy, except almost every movie that tries ends up sucking at it. The characters are of course flat caricatures--but they're *very good* flat caricatures who interact beautifully--much of the humour is actually character driven, in the sense that any given line could have been spoken by nobody else. The delivery is excellent, the timing--that essence of comedy--is *perfect*. Nothing is done too broad, everything is done broad enough.
The Princess Bride is genius. It's up there with Court Jester. This desecrator must get his comeuppance!
Hooot tar! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Rufus, to save myself the dreaded penalty, I will promise, if ever cajoled in watching TPB again, to keep your comments foremost in my open mind.
The other night I watched Before The Devil Knows You're Dead. I quite enjoyed it. A couple of critical comments(and spoilers)...
-the "family drama" stuff following the funeral didn't really work for me. I can understand that the father, who didn't know the true facts of the murder, would want to discuss his family's problems with the son at a time like that. However, it seemed less than plausible that Philip Seymour Hoffman would be as into the discussion as he seemed to be, given that he was lugging around the knowledge that he was responsible for the death of his own mother. I think he'd he'd be barely able to focus on anything besides what he had just done, and what he was going to do next.
-While admittedly I have never been involved in heroin purchases, the scenes at the dealer's apartment just didn't ring credible to me. The shooting gallery seemed more like a posh medical clinic than a venue for consumming illegal drugs. I guess that since the guy was using his own apartment as his store, he'd want to keep things nice and clean, but still, it seemed kind of odd.
-Even with the knowledge of what had taken place, I don't know if the Albert Finney character would have quite so automatically made the decision to kill his own son. Granted, this was a pretty extreme situation he was involved in, but I think most average law-abaiding people would just swallow the horrifying truth and go to the police.
Other than that, it was quite good, much more believable than your average "caper" flick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For me, the real story was that Lumet could crank out a tight thriller at age 83. I've seen so many crime films by guys half his age that weren't nearly as well made. coughGuyRitchiecough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | For me, the real story was that Lumet could crank out a tight thriller at age 83. I've seen so many crime films by guys half his age that weren't nearly as well made. coughGuyRitchiecough. |
Yeah, the problem with crime thrillers for the past 20 years or so(and yes, this is going to be a thinly veiled anti-Tarantino rant) is that they portray criminals as these hip, jive-talking bohos, in order to pander to an audience of hip, jivetalking bohos who like to imagine that they have something in common with genuine outlaw culture.
Whereas Before The Devil just shows its criminals as being rather unexcitingly amoral middle-class semi-losers, drawn into crime by desperate, though not sensationalized, personal circumstances. All without having to sacrifice the "thrill" aspect of the thriller genre.
And yes. Very impressive late-career performance by Sidney Lumet. It really felt like it could just as easily have been directed by someone in his twenties. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Geez...maybe just a tad age-ist?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hephaestion Deeply Shallow

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 24243 Location: Where the Wild Things Are...
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just saw "Blindness" the other day. Awesome flick. Anyone else seen it? _________________ "The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raos volatilis vir

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 5480 Location: Petropolis
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I saw it, I'm not sure I'd quite call it awesome. It certainly had its brutal moments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hephaestion Deeply Shallow

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 24243 Location: Where the Wild Things Are...
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It was, in the same sense that "Grapes of Wrath" or Lord of the Flies" was. It achieves what it sets out to do. (The screenplay was by Canadian Don McKellar, btw.)
Good write-up here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindness_(film) _________________ "The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Evil Twin Stoned Immaculate

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3748 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Yeah, the problem with crime thrillers for the past 20 years or so(and yes, this is going to be a thinly veiled anti-Tarantino rant) is that they portray criminals as these hip, jive-talking bohos, in order to pander to an audience of hip, jivetalking bohos who like to imagine that they have something in common with genuine outlaw culture. |
Yeah I just watched "Inglorious Basterds" this past weekend and I had the same reaction to the SS Colonel. I always thought the average Nazi killer was a generally banal individual (as described by Hannah Arendt). But Tarantino seems to have a fetish for making the vilest characters seem the "coolest" or most interesting people in his movies. I imagine that if Tarantino ever made a movie about the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, he'd make thoroughly boring uneducated rednecks like Lynndie England and Charles Granger (the two posing in most of the released/leaked pictures) seem like trash talking hipsters who dropped cool pop culture references as they graphically tortured Iraqis.  _________________ I can't support bike lanes. Roads are built for buses, cars, and trucks. My heart bleeds when someone gets killed, but it's their own fault at the end of the day. - Assclown Rob Ford |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I imagine that if Tarantino ever made a movie about the Abu Ghraib torture scandal ... |
Well, there's the problem: Tarantino can't make a film about Abu Ghraib until someone else does it first. Because everything you see in a Tarantino movie is appropriated from other movies, whether it's Hong Kong action, Blaxploitation or war thrillers. It's as if the guy is incapable of perceiving the world except through the films that came before him. And, as far as I'm concerned, he doesn't have the ability to do this in an intelligent or thoughtful or problematizing way. He's just a kid with toys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Evil Twin Stoned Immaculate

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3748 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Well, there's the problem: Tarantino can't make a film about Abu Ghraib until someone else does it first. Because everything you see in a Tarantino movie is appropriated from other movies, whether it's Hong Kong action, Blaxploitation or war thrillers. It's as if the guy is incapable of perceiving the world except through the films that came before him. And, as far as I'm concerned, he doesn't have the ability to do this in an intelligent or thoughtful or problematizing way. He's just a kid with toys. |
Very true. _________________ I can't support bike lanes. Roads are built for buses, cars, and trucks. My heart bleeds when someone gets killed, but it's their own fault at the end of the day. - Assclown Rob Ford |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legless_Marine Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Evil Twin wrote: | | Yeah I just watched "Inglorious Basterds" this past weekend |
Myself as well.
The film was ok... despite itself. All the usual boring cliches were on parade: Tarantino-vengeance-thriller as some kind of art, evil-authoritarian-vampires as nazis, jews as helpless victims, cold-blooded-femme fatale, and of course the arrogant and hyperconfident soldier archetype - With added southern US accent as an extra bonus. It's the usual trying-so-hard exercise in cultural recycling.
The film was brutally long. Felt like I spent 2.5 hours watching Tarantino tugging at his johnson.
The film was nonetheless bearable, if only because the primary plot arc was fairly engaging. It may be worth the time it takes to torrent and watch, but probably not worth paying for a movie ticket. _________________ Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legless_Marine Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 7:47 am Post subject: Knowing (2009) |
|
|
Knowing (2009):
What a delightful film. To say too much about this film is to risk ruining it, however, a recap of the opening sequences sufficiently sets the stage:
The film opens in 1959, with a class of students making drawings to leave in the school's time capsule. Creepy little Lucinda, apparently in a trance, writes a page-long sequence of numbers. When forced to stop by her teacher, she disappears to the basement, where she resumes her numerological spew, in blood, on the wall of a janitor closet.
Fast forward 50 years, when the son of an MIT professor obtains the list of numbers after the school unearths the time capsule. The prof soon realizes that the list contains coded prophecies of major disasters.
Highly recommended. A first class sci-fi/paranormal thriller. _________________ Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you!
Last edited by Legless_Marine on Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rufus Polson Purple Library Guy
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3483 Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
So does this delightful film have a name, or is its paranormal power such that if you just think about it in the video store and reach out at random, you'll get the right one?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SPOILERS AHEAD
I believe that film was called Knowing, and yeah, it was quite delightful, even with its rather literal rendition of the creation myth at the end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't know if "restrained" is the right word, but Nicolas Cage's performance in Knowing was subdued compared to, say, Bad Lieutenant. In fact, he seemed almost comatose at times. Kind of a welcome change from his normal over-acting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legless_Marine Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rufus Polson wrote: | So does this delightful film have a name, or is its paranormal power such that if you just think about it in the video store and reach out at random, you'll get the right one?  |
One only need check the subject line of the post.
The movie name has been added to the body of the post as well. _________________ Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| anne cameron wrote: | | Geez...maybe just a tad age-ist?? |
Well, I don't think it's any secret that, in general, the older one gets, the greater the chances one has of developing any number of medical conditions which may hinder physical or mental activity. Speaking for myself, if I manage to make it to 83 while still being able to peform the same slackass job that I have now, let alone direct tightly crafted crime thrillers as Mr. Lumet does, I'd consider that a pretty remarkable thing indeed.
Plus, Lumet succeeds not only in the mere act of producing an expertly made thriller, but also in maintaining a general ambience that can appeal to young audiences raised on more recent material. I don't know if anyone here has seen Hitchcock's Frenzy, but it's pretty evident that Hitchcock was trying to make a contemporary thriller for a post-1960s audience, but ended up with a vision of London that might have seemed credible in the late 50s, at latest. (Not that I don't like Frenzy, it's actually one of my favorite Hitchcocks, partly for its anachronisitc feel.) Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut is another example of this. It's an interesting film, by all means, but comes off looking like a sex thriller with post-1970s standards of explicitness, but made in the 1950s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hephaestion Deeply Shallow

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 24243 Location: Where the Wild Things Are...
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Quote: | | Guy Ritchie is the worst screenwriter in the world, but, to be fair, he is not the worst director. He is only the worst director of the people who actually get to make movies. As we speak, there are human beings walking the Earth -- perhaps as many as a half dozen of them -- with less directorial talent, but they've been safely diverted into other activities. |
-- Movie critic Mick LaSalle, in his review of the craptacular Sherlock Holmes |
Not the first bad review I've heard/read. _________________ "The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thwap Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4564 Location: Hamilton
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| anne cameron wrote: | | Geez...maybe just a tad age-ist?? |
A serious question, and my serious answer would be, besides the biological realities that appear to afflict more and more of us as we age, there's the reality that many people become set in their ways and bored.
If you're still absolutely WOWING people after a certain age, consider yourself as blessed as a genuine enfant terrible.
And i apologize in advance if this post sounds condescending, (i was going to say "patronizing" until the irony slapped me in the face) I'm only making it because you asked a serious question that deserved more than a single response. _________________ Man! I hate them fancy-lads! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Isn't that also a function of cultural perception, as to what could be considered 'wowing'? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cartman Beyond cuddly

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8676 Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Myself as well.
The film was ok... despite itself. |
No, that film sucked too. Brad Pitt proved that he can't act. It reminded me of his brutal performance in "7 Years in Tibet". Hell, I think that Elvis was a better actor!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm glad it wasn't just me who was thinking that. He was campy and cheesy without having any of the good qualities those acting styles should bring with them. Which is to say, it was simply bad acting.
I remain mystified who was talking about that film going for an Oscar. I was not interested or intrigued by the characters and the gratuitous violence remains a stupid device. I do not find it an intelligent comment on society or popular culture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| elmateo wrote: | | Isn't that also a function of cultural perception, as to what could be considered 'wowing'? |
Sure, but the ability to be in tune with those cultural perceptions, and to appeal to them in the creation of art(or indeed, whatever), can in and of itself also be considered "wowing".
I'm in my early 40s, and am totally at a loss as to any communications technology more contemporary than the simple internet. I honestly don't know how to use a cell phone, and have only the vaguest idea about what ipods, blackberries, iphones, etc are. (And am I correct in my perception that twitter is just a glorified message board, only based more on phones than computers? Sincere question).
As such, I'm pretty much at a loss as to what my middle-school aged students are talking about when they get into all this stuff. And yeah, it's all just a matter of subjective perception whether or not we reagrd such topics as important. However, if you were to tell me about a 65 year old who could walk into a classroom and rap with the kids about the latest iphone innovations, I'd be fairly impressed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only time Brad Pitt demonstrated any sort of acting talent was when he played the grifter in "Thelma and Louise", and then it was the women carried his performance.
He's a pouty-mouthed prettyboy. I haven't seen his "basterds" film and I won't, but the previews on the TV certainly betray his inability to do a southern accent.
As for Tarantino...puh-leeeeze, if we're to have a serious discussion about film we cannot, in all honesty, include that git nor any of his messy work.
He needs a rubber room.
not that I feel strongly about it, you understand...and one of these days I'll tell you how I really feel... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hephaestion Deeply Shallow

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 24243 Location: Where the Wild Things Are...
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oooo! They're making a film version of "Eagle of the Ninth" -- this I wanna see! (I hope they don't wreck it!) _________________ "The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F. Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 2578
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | And am I correct in my perception that twitter is just a glorified message board, only based more on phones than computers? Sincere question |
I heard that Twitter isn't really a message board, it's more like a service where subscribers receive periodic updates from someone, like a rock star or a celebrity, when they join a subscription list. So if you go get yourself a Twitter account, and if we all join your mailing list, you can send updates to our phones about all the little things that make your life so damn great, like that bagel you had for lunch or whatever.
One strange thing: there's like a strict word limit, so all the messages are in internet lingo. I don't know what's the deal with the word limit.
It all just seems like PR to me. They must have done market research to figure out that people are more likely to buy your record or go see your movie if you fire off the occasional update. I figure people feel the information is more personalized when it arrives like this. And because you can make your own messages to send out to your loyal followers, it lets you feel like you're participating in something glamourous.
But that's just my uneducated guess. I don't do any of that, so I don't really know. Someone who actually knows about this crap might want to set me straight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The word limit is the character limit of a text message so that you can both text it in and receive the updates on your (non-email powered) cellphone. It is instant broadcasting of short bursts of text whenever/wherever to a potential wide range of people. Its stupid and powerful at the same time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legless_Marine Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| elmateo wrote: | | Its stupid and powerful at the same time. |
Nicely said. From a design perspective, it is best described as "Push microblogging"
Push=Content is delivered directly to end users, instead of them having to seek it out.
Micro=Small (Reference to entry size)
Blogging=Telling the world about your stupid shit.
I believe it's used primarily by teens to update their peers as to their current activities "I just saw billy at the mall", or "I'm taking a poop", but has also been leveraged by institutions as a PR tool. _________________ Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's actually funny (but not funny ha ha) and sad that in a discussion centering around film, we would write as if Tarantino and Sidney Lumet were somehow colleagues or equals or...
As F pointed out, Tarantino has never had an original idea in his entire career. Whereas Lumet specializes in original ideas, focus, and interpretation. He's a genius at re-examining things we thought we "Knew"...
And while I am more than willing to accept that age can have a deteriorating effect on our capabilities, and especially on the energy level required to be creative for hours, days, weeks at a time, I don't accept any suggestion that Lumet, regardless of his age, has been reduced to such a point that he is to be compared to Tarantino.
What I see (and remember, please, I'm damned near as old as Lumet!), is that we are in a period of frittering, of ditzing around with toys, and of being easily distracted by the latest gimcrack or gizmo. There's no way I could walk into the classroom and discuss Facebook or Twitter or , for that matter, the relative merits of Wii and X-box... I know fuck all about any of that. We don't even have cell phone coverage in Tahsis, the mountains have spared us that infliction. Thank you, mountains.
I suspect many creative young people are going into the production of computer games, learning about computer programming, about writing programmes, about animation, and not going into the more traditional genre's like writing novels or scripts for feature film.
And perhaps it's just as well because at the risk of sounding like an old bat, I will ask where, pray tell, are the real actors today? We're up to our assholes in asshole characters played by "stars" who were unknown two years ago.
Distraction, momentary entertainment, immediate gratification, and surface fluff abound, and the Oscars this year are going to be ludicrous (not that they have ever been particularly meaningful).
I have never been a fan of animation, I think my sense of "taste" was developed at a time when animation was referred to as "cartoons". I often watch what I'm told are award winning animations from the NFB and my response is usually "oh fer fucks sake"...
I want a plot with a solid story line, I want character development and I want actors, not "stars"... with the result I don't even rent the "latest hits" and I sure as hell wouldn't drive three hours over mountain gravel roads to go to Campbell River to see Brad Pitt making yet another fool of himself with a cheesy accent and some self important preening.
Ah, but we know about us old geezers, eh...we're stubborn as hell, and will probably never accept Tarantino as a peer of Lumet!
Now , as a peer of that creepy fuck Polanski, yeah, but... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|