| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dead-profile Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: Climate Change discussion thread! |
|
|
I've been wanting to put this up here more to start a discussion than anything else. It is my intent to understand the causes of climate change and ultimately the effects... and I think there may just be a few like minds that would be willing to discuss.
I used climate change and not global warming for a few good reasons, but we can get into that later
Climate change causes:
Increase of Greenhouse gasses. It's hard to tell how much of an effect it has had on the temperatures... For what it's worth, water in the air has the potential to be a more powerful greenhouse gas then most of the things we are releasing... However it is still an increase.
An increase in 'heat' on the earth can come from three places. Increase that is being generated on the globe (so an increase in geothermal activity could contribute). An increase in potential energy gathered from outside sources such as the sun. Not ruling anything out, the sun goes through phases and could easily be emitting more heat than it used to. Finally a decrease in the amount of energy lost to space (that gets into greenhouse gasses)
Reduction in ice caps. Water (ocean) asorbs heat while ice reflects. Less ice means more water to asorb heat. This causes a bit of a railroad effect... More heat asorbed means less ice which means more heat asorbed.
Pressure changes. Air pressure is bassically the weight of the air upon us. The hydron carbon emissions are heavier than air and the increase in these hydrocarbos means the amount of air pressure is on the rise. In addition, the formula for pressure is directly related to temperature. So this additional mass and temperature in the air is creating some interesting pressure patterns across the globe. Alot of our weather is now 'global' patterns and not local patterns any longer. Large high pressure regions heat over the pacific and move over north america. The large high pressure front brings unusually high temperatures across North America... This larger high pressure area moves on leaving an exceedingly lower pressure system to move in behind it, often dragging arctic fronts with it. This causes the Exceedingly warm record breaking temps followed by exceedingly low, near record temps soon after (often just a day after).
Ice acts as the Earths 'temperature buffer'. Basic chem (grade 10 or 11?) tells us ice changeing to water (and water chaing to vapor) takes alot of extra energy to do so. Right now the icecaps are taking enourmous amount of energy out of the atmosphere by changing states from ice to water. This amazingly huge amount of energy is having absoluteley no affect on our environment as the 'ice buffer' is taking the hit instead. Right now we'll see maybe one degree in either direction? WHen this buffer is gone, this huge amount of energy being removed by ice is going to start warming the atmosphere instead.
Effects:
The warmer weather is going to mean more active water is in the environment. Flooding and the sort is going to be much more coomon (as it has last year). I would expect (prediction # 1) this spring/summer to continue in that pattern and communities prone to flooding are going to get hit again. This is eventually going to effect more prone costal cities as the water levels rise. It will be a gradual change until a larger weather pattern devestates the region (Such as New Orleans. Any city beneath sea level should be planning for this event, included Vancouver).
Though the more devastating effect for now is going to be caused by the air pressure irregularities. The larger highs are going to be accompanied by larger low pressures (like an oscillating wave). Hurricane formation and strength is directly related to pressure... Wilma last year set a record for lowest air pressure last season and (prediction # 2) Wilma's record will be broken by atleast one hurricane, likely more. Look for one messy hurricane season this year. We wil see the presence of much larger global systems then we have in the past as well (one system that affects the weather across all of north america).
Seaonal changes. With more water in the air, temperatures will take more energy to change in either direction... So the mean temperatures (the temperature 'most common', not average) is going to be much more mild. Winter will not be as cold and summer will not be as hot. However, the larger global systems (caused by the pressure changes) are going to bring in streaks of extremes in both directons (weather patterns not natural to the region cause by exceedingly larger and larger global patterns). So prediction number 3... Mild and very wet spring/autumn's and mild but drier summer/winters with extremes in either direction.
Ice buffer removal. When the Earth loses it's ice, it loses it's ability to regulate heat. Once that ice is gone (2012-2015?), the Earth will have lost it's ability to regulate heat... Meaningfully when this does happen, we'll see an exceedingly large increase in average temperatures (5 degrees in 5 years? Hard to calculate... How much energy does it take to melt ice the size of the great lakes in a year and how much will that warm the globe instead? Either way, it'll be a big breaking point that will see the globe change in a huge way.)
Well, theres what I've got so far. Still doing internet research and if anyone was willing to share more ideas on it for me to research, I'd love to hear it. Surprisingly I'm finding the extra heat has very little to do with climate change... The biggest changes are do to the air pressure variations.
Addited to fix which weather was whether  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 6:39 pm Post subject: Re: Climate Change discussion thread! |
|
|
[OT post edited]
Last edited by transplant on Thu May 04, 2006 7:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dead-profile Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes yes it should be. Hehe, I looked for a while on where this should go but couldn't find a good spot for it (completely missed that one, yay me) Unfortunately I've got no clue how to move it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[OT post edited]
Last edited by transplant on Thu May 04, 2006 7:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RealityBites Satan Incarnate

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1584
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Moved. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holly Stick Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 470 Location: still pretty far west
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Realclimate is an excellent site, run by real climatologists; the best place to educate yourself on all the aspects; CO2, other gases, water vapour, positive feedback, what is wrong with various arguments by the sceptics, etc., etc. They aim to educate the media and the public, not to get involved in politics, though politics intrudes its ugly head occasionally. Some articles are a little too technical; but there is a lot to learn here.
http://www.realclimate.org/ _________________ You want it WHEN? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holly Stick Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 470 Location: still pretty far west
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's an article that RealClimate linked to, that explains aspects of climate science for laypeople.
from Wall Street Journal
| Quote: | | ...One signature is the pattern of warming in the atmosphere. Decades of data from satellites and weather balloons show that the lower atmosphere, or troposphere, has warmed while the upper atmosphere, or stratosphere, has cooled. "If you turn up the sun's energy output, the atmosphere should warm from the stratosphere to the surface," says Dr. Santer. "That's contrary to what's observed. But greenhouse gases do not produce a uniform warming. They warm the troposphere and cool the stratosphere."... |
_________________ You want it WHEN? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Climate change denial moonbats
Forget Iraq and the War on Terror, the right is gearing up for the real war for civilization as they know it.
Fox Analyst: Global Warming is ‘Bogus…Dreamed Up by The Greens Because They Hate Industry’
Think Progress - This weekend on the show “Cashin’ In,” Fox News analyst Jonathan Hoenig asserted that global warming was “bogus,” and “dreamed up” by environmentalists to stop economic development:
There’s no scientific proof that global warming even exists. To be honest, it’s a bogus consensus dreamed up by Greens because they hate industry. They hate advancement. They hate technology…Greens will lead us back to the stone ages. ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
National Review Bastardizes James Hansen’s Global Warming Research
Think Progress - Jason Steorts is on the defensive about his National Review cover story on global warming “Scare of the Century.” Steorts’s article seeks to dismiss the conclusion of thousands of climate scientists on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that global warming is real, the result of human activity and, if unmitigated, will have grave consequences.
In his latest response to our critique, Steorts enlists James Hansen – the NASA climate scientist who was famously muzzled by the Bush administration for his outspoken views about the dangers of global warming – to bolster his point. Steorts quotes Hansen as saying “the IPCC scenarios are unduly pessimistic.”
Steorts never links to Hansen’s actual writing, but to a blog written by fellow climate skeptics characterizing Hansen’s work. Here’s what James Hansen actually said: ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hunters and Fishermen Want Action on Global Warming
LiveScience - In what might signal a turning point in environmental sentiment in America, a new poll of hunters and fishermen finds the majority think the country is on the wrong track with its energy policy and should be a leader in combating global warming.
In the poll of licensed hunters and anglers, 76 percent said global warming is occurring and 73 percent believe it is impacting or will impact hunting and fishing conditions. A full 78 percent said the solutions should involve conserving more energy, developing fuel-efficient vehicles and expanding the use of renewable sources.
The nationwide poll of 1,031 hunters and anglers was conducted by Responsive Management of Harrisonburg, Virginia for the National Wildlife Federation.
The respondents had voted for President Bush in 2004 by about a 2-to-1 margin, and half of them identified themselves as evangelical Christians.
“We are reaching a tipping point in this country where the vital sportsmen’s constituency is adding its voice to those who recognize global warming is occurring, that it poses serious threats and that action must be taken to address it,” said Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation. ...
----
Like it or not, Ducks Unlimited and other hunting groups have been instrumental in preserving wetland wildlife habitat. Getting these guys on-side is crucial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DTA Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 694 Location: ////
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Al Gore's new film gets thumbs up from scientists
| Quote: | The nation's top climate scientists are giving "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore's documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy.
The former vice president's movie -- replete with the prospect of a flooded New York City, an inundated Florida, more and nastier hurricanes, worsening droughts, retreating glaciers and disappearing ice sheets -- mostly got the science right, said all 19 climate scientists who had seen the movie or read the book and answered questions from The Associated Press.
The AP contacted more than 100 top climate researchers by e-mail and phone for their opinion. Among those contacted were vocal skeptics of climate change theory. Most scientists had not seen the movie, which is in limited release, or read the book.
But those who have seen it had the same general impression: Gore conveyed the science correctly; the world is getting hotter and it is a manmade catastrophe-in-the-making caused by the burning of fossil fuels.
"Excellent," said William Schlesinger, dean of the Nicholas School of Environment and Earth Sciences at Duke University. "He got all the important material and got it right."
Robert Corell, chairman of the worldwide Arctic Climate Impact Assessment group of scientists, read the book and saw Gore give the slideshow presentation that is woven throughout the documentary.
"I sat there and I'm amazed at how thorough and accurate," Corell said. "After the presentation I said, `Al, I'm absolutely blown away. There's a lot of details you could get wrong.' ... I could find no error."
Gore, in an interview with the AP, said he wasn't surprised "because I took a lot of care to try to make sure the science was right." |
Read the rest here
The article goes on to say Bushie wont see it. I also guess a lot of people are afraid of the truth too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This week CBC Newsworld has run three climate change docs in the 10pm slot. On Sunday it was Meltdown: A Global Warming on Passionate Eye. On Monday it was Global Warming: Bush's Climate of Fear, also on Passionate Eye. Tonight, it was Life and Times of El Niño. No doubt they will repeat at some future time. The most chilling moment was tonight, when one computer model forecast that global warming would exacerbate El Niño strength and duration, with a 1 in 6 chance result that El Niño could become permanent and turn the Amazon rain forest (what remains of it) into desert, eliminating a huge biomass that absorbs CO2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | On Monday it was Global Warming: Bush's Climate of Fear |
That was an amazing documentary and I'll recommend others give a watch. I love how badly it goes after Bush and his record (including his record in Texas) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
virge47 Self-banned
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 354
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As far as global warming is concerned I feel we are already past the tipping point and if we act quickly, then maybe we can mitigate the damage. As far as reversing the process, NOT going to happen. It has in my opinion reached the point of damage control and unfortunatetly only the countries with the resources will be able to survive over the long haul, by spending large amounts of money and resources in order to minimize the negative aspects of global warming. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Virge... You've hit the nail on the head. Our attempts at preventing climate change now is like farting into a hurricane hoping to slow it down. All we can do is brace for the impacts and shake our heads at those that denied (I would love to see 5 years in the future the entire US admin get brought to justice for their crimes against our earth... And Exxon).
Fortunately I live on the Canadian Praries and the most I'll have to put up with is my land turning into a desert. Las Vegas like climate isn't too bad is it? Those on the coastlines should seriously consider plans to move further inland. I'm afraid Vancouver maybe the Canadian New Orleans.
I should clarify this doesn't mean I think we should continue on these ways... We still need to limit these gasses to limit the effect they will have. However trying to 'prevent' or 'stop' global warming or global climate change has now become misleading as it implies we can undo decades of waste simply by cutting down to levels of previous years.
Ah well, Humans are destined to destroy ourselves. Atleast it's entertaining to watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DTA Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 694 Location: ////
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | So the warnings of harsher heat waves, stronger hurricanes and rising seas fail to impress. How about volcanic eruptions in the Arctic, or a tsunami off the coast of Newfoundland?
The latest scientific discipline to enter the fray over global warming is geology.
And the forecasts from some quarters are dramatic - not only will the earth shake, it will spit fire.
A number of geologists say glacial melting due to climate change will unleash pent-up pressures in the Earth's crust, causing extreme geological events such as earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions.
A cubic metre of ice weighs nearly a tonne and some glaciers are more than a kilometre thick. When the weight is removed through melting, the suppressed strains and stresses of the underlying rock come to life.
University of Alberta geologist Patrick Wu compares the effect to that of a thumb pressed on a soccer ball - when the pressure of the thumb is removed, the ball springs back to its original shape.
Because the earth is so viscous the rebound happens slowly, and the quakes that occasionally shake Eastern Canada are attributed to ongoing rebound from the last ice age more than 10,000 years ago.
Melting of the ice that covers Antarctica or Greenland would have a similar impact, but the process would be accelerated due to the human-induced greenhouse effect.
"What happens is the weight of this thick ice puts a lot of stress on the earth," says Wu. "The weight sort of suppresses the earthquakes but when you melt the ice the earthquakes get triggered."
When a quake happens under water it can cause a tsunami. Wu said melting of the Antarctic ice is already causing earthquakes and underground landslides although they get little attention. He predicted climate warming will bring "lots of earthquakes."
When the glaciers melt, the reliquified water causes sea levels to rise and increases the weight on the ocean floor, which could also have an effect on the grinding tectonic plates deep below the surface.
The Earth's crust is more sensitive than some might think. There are well-documented cases of dams causing earthquakes when the weight of the water behind a dam fills a reservoir. |
Read the rest here
That sounds, well, pretty scary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is very scary... I'll run this by a few geologists and get their input on it all.
The earth letting go a massive wave of methane isn't anything new... Apparently it's happened before where a giant pocket of methane around where England is today (I'm talking millions of years ago) erupted into the earths atmosphere (I like to call it the day the earth farted). There is evidence to support this sudden burst of methane into the air raised temperatures on earth for years afterwards.
Personally, I would be surprised about massive earth quakes and volcanoes forming... However, the massive release of various gasses under the glaciers is a reality I know we'll see shortly (read as the global warming snowball effect) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In one of those CBC documentaries I thought they tested the methane in the ice stuff, at least in Antarctica, and didn't find high levels of methane captured in the ice? (they were taking core samples, and melting it)
Might be me watching tv going nutso though . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The gas technically isn't trapped in the ice... It's trapped under the ice and underneath the several layers of permafrosted ground and it's this permafrost melting and breaking up that releases the gas (the permafrost also provides the only roads into many regions too). I thought the amount actually in ice was pretty negligable.
I'm not sure how much of an issue in the antarctic though (not sure about the land mass under the ice sheets). The Arctic however..... Remember the area was once upon a time a lush tropical environement (I think that study was linked on this board even)... All that lush tropical vegitation would have remained and continued to degrade after ice built up on it. Years and years of decomposition has taken place underneath layers and layers of ice (and occasionally getting melted and stirred as the tremendous weight of the glacier move over the land). Would it stand to reason that when the ice melts, the years and years worth of decomp will be released into the air (I know I'm simplifying, but I think the example works).
Addit: The bigger antarctic fear is an entire sheet breaking off from the rock and sliding into the ocean, producing a wave which would make the tsunami of '04 seem tiny. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leftcoastguy Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 5977 Location: Leftcoast
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Noise
Maybe Noah's Ark was just a bit ahead of its time, eh! What about Halifax or any other coastline muncipality as well?
| Quote: | | Fortunately I live on the Canadian Praries and the most I'll have to put up with is my land turning into a desert. Las Vegas like climate isn't too bad is it? Those on the coastlines should seriously consider plans to move further inland. I'm afraid Vancouver maybe the Canadian New Orleans. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
morningstar Fulltime enMasse Member

Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 144 Location: STRATFORD
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
i listened to james lovelock speaking on cbc radio and he called it climate collapse. jl is the old climatologist who wrote 'gaia' in 1979 and took tremendous heat for his ideas. he has since been [sadly] vindicated in most of his predictions.
he was sad and resigned in the interview. he thinks that humanity should be storing our most valuable information [germ theory,etc] for the possible survivors of the general collapse of all climate systems.
he is taking alot of heat again for his recent ideas but i had a horrible attack of deja vieux listening to his gentle, reasonable voice. i hope that he isn't so accurate this time as he was last time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Maybe Noah's Ark was just a bit ahead of its time, eh! What about Halifax or any other coastline muncipality as well? |
Perhaps Noah's Ark was right on time, history simply repeats itself?
I'd have to do the research once again for it, but I beleive the majority of the 'antarctic ice sheet' threat is aimed into the pacific. Bear in mind that it's mostly a scare/fear tactic at this time with little actual data behind it (speculation is probably the best term)... Probably as realistic as 'Day After Tomorrow' was. heh
If you are going for the 'Vancouver may be Canada's New Orleans comment'... From what I've been told good parts of Vanc is at or below sea level. Maritimes have rough coastline and most of the buildings exist on higher land... No? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
California's greenhouse gas emissions plan pits Arnold vs. Bush
California on brink of global warming breakthrough
Reuters - California is forging ahead with the most aggressive U.S. program to reduce global warming -- a plan that pits Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger against fellow Republican George W. Bush.
Both the governor and his state's Democratic-led legislature want to make California -- the world's eighth largest economy -- a model to follow with caps in greenhouse gas emissions that the U.S. president rejects.
State politicians still are hammering out differences over the proposed Global Warming Solutions Act. If passed, it is likely to play a role in November's vote for governor and in national politics for years to come.
Schwarzenegger -- branded "very green for a Republican" by the conservation group Sierra Club -- became an overnight hero for environmentalists a year ago by setting a goal to cut California's emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Anonymous free thinker
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 310
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:16 am Post subject: Re: Climate Change discussion thread! |
|
|
| Dead-profile wrote: | Still doing internet research and if anyone was willing to share more ideas on it for me to research, I'd love to hear it.
|
For the open-minded and willing to search a not-too-well organized site, I suggest www.enterprisemission.com and hyperdimensional physics. http://www.enterprisemission.com/physics.html might be a place to start. _________________ "Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen."
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing."
- Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clog-boy Lucid Dreamer

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1524 Location: Arnhem, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another effect of climate change:
Britain ready for sheep killer
| Quote: | UK sheep could soon be at risk from a deadly disease spread by midges.
The bluetongue virus has long blighted Africa but in recent years has begun to spread northwards into Europe as the range of the biting insects has increased.
[...]
Dr Philip Mellor, of the Institute for Animal Health, said that once the disease got into a flock up to 70% of the animals could die.
"It's horrendous," he told the festival. "Animals that have mouths full of blood don't eat very well; animals that have affected eyes don't see very well; animals that have damaged feet don't walk very well." There is no treatment.
The bluetongue is transmitted by the Culicoides imicola midge, which has been steadily moving to higher latitudes.
"The virus exists around the world in a very broad band from about 40 degrees north to about 35 degrees south. But in the last five years we've had outbreaks in Europe which have been spreading up to 44 degrees north," Dr Mellor said.
"This is about 800 kilometres further north than ever before."
This was almost certainly caused by climate change, he said. The worry now is that midge species living even further north are picking up the virus and continuing the trend. |
This article from three years ago has become an awful truth for us Dutch yesterday. Bluetongue has reared it's ugly head in the South, appearing for the first time ever in the Netherlands. 2 Farms have been infected, 11 more are suspect. An export prohibition for all live-stock has been established. In a radius of 20km all transport of ruminants has been forbidden.
Bluetongue is harmless to humans, but I've heard/read stories that the malaria-mosquito might follow the same path and gradually migrate further north as the temperatures rise...
 _________________ But I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Clog-boy wrote: | | This article from three years ago has become an awful truth for us Dutch yesterday. Bluetongue has reared it's ugly head in the South, appearing for the first time ever in the Netherlands. |
Just one of many consequences that those contending that climate change is a good thing won't tell us about.
Morons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
libertarian Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 53
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DSquared aka Aristotleded24
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3924 Location: Winnipeg
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe so, but you have to look at long-term trends, which do indicate that we can expect more storms in the future. It doesn't say anything about what will happen or how many storms we will have in one particular year, and just because this year may bring fewer storms, doesn't mean the overall pattern isn't holding up. _________________ This is pre-eminently the time, to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself-Franklin Delano Roosevelt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
libertarian Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dsquared: You are absolutely correct. I just get pissed off when a record high temp or big hurricane occurs and everyone yells "Global Warming"
Weather and climate are 2 different phenomena. The trend is the problem to concentrate on, as you say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| libertarian wrote: | | Unexpected drop in storms this season |
And that's a good thing, no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DSquared aka Aristotleded24
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3924 Location: Winnipeg
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| libertarian wrote: | Dsquared: You are absolutely correct. I just get pissed off when a record high temp or big hurricane occurs and everyone yells "Global Warming"
Weather and climate are 2 different phenomena. The trend is the problem to concentrate on, as you say. |
Well when you have a documented trend clearly showing rising temperatures overall, and we do have a record hurricane season, record warm winter, record warm month, or whatever, people are going to take notice and link the record events with global warming. The individual occurences are consistent with patterns and changes that have already been predicted, not counting the blips when things are colder. _________________ This is pre-eminently the time, to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself-Franklin Delano Roosevelt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ephemeral Radical Sock-Mismatcher

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 586 Location: Under a bridge with a laptop
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DSquared wrote: | | The individual occurences are consistent with patterns and changes that have already been predicted, not counting the blips when things are colder. |
Sorry I don't have a link cause someone I trust told me. I've heard that global warming can be held responsible not only for harsher temperatures, but also for sudden and drastic changes in temperature. So, when we have an incredibly warm week, and the very next week is freezing cold before it gets warm the week after... and we have had a fair bit of that in Ontario over the last year and a half... apparently, that's global warming too. So, those blips when things get much, much colder (not seasonally cold temperatures) are a predictable pattern of global warming.
Different information on storms here
| Quote: | For the 2006 season, Noaa's initial forecast predicted 13-16 named storms, four of which would go on to become "major storms".
In August, however, officials revised their forecast, saying that there would be 12-15 named storms. But this was still above the long-term average of 11.
...
Call for action
The coalition, whose 20 members include Tearfund, Greenpeace and WWF, said there were three main challenges that needed to be addressed:
stopping and reversing further global warming
how to live with global warming that cannot be stopped
the need for a "climate friendly" development framework that delivers an equitable share of natural resources
"Currently, we do not have a meaningful emissions reduction target that will prevent runaway climate change, " Mr Simms said.
"We also do not have an idea of the scale of the resources needed to help developing countries deal with it."
He added: "We must apply a climate test to how the world does business. If we don't then we will probably inadvertently make things much worse." |
_________________ and on that note... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | So, those blips when things get much, much colder (not seasonally cold temperatures) are a predictable pattern of global warming. |
Air preassure is directly related to Air temperature. Air heats over the tropics and moves over the land. These high pressure moves across the land and ss it moves, lower pressure sneaks in behind it... Which is quite often arcic air being pulled south. These High pressure regions with higher temperatures at our equaters have become more defined and the amount of 'low pressure' they drag down behind them has become greater and greater.
What we should see it the aveage temperature moving towards more mild norms (slightly cooler summer, slightly warmer winter) with big blips in either direction (a high pressure zone with exceedingly high temps, then arctic air pulled in behind that for exceedingly cold temperatures.
Long story short, local weather patterns and systems get drowned out by the ever larger high pressure regions floating around the globe.
Sorry if I've over simplified on that... It's hard to explain without som degree of pre-knowledge on weather patterns. This isn't always true as cold high pressure regions still for in the artic and push south, but it occours much more frequently. Interesting side note... Hurricane strength is very often measured by pressure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ephemeral Radical Sock-Mismatcher

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 586 Location: Under a bridge with a laptop
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, that's perfectly clear. Sounds just like my grade 9 geography class. _________________ and on that note... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Norse of 60 Kokanee Kid

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3711
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by Norse of 60 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:48 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm trying... Let me know if it warms any ^^
Oh, if you're in ontario... Prepare for the heavy rains and possibly tropical depression strength winds of Ernesto hitting you this weekend (120 hours from now or so). Srry, try as I may, I can't warm that up ^^
added... TD winds are usually sustained winds around 30-35 MPH. Personally I think it'll be just a giant rainshower by that time |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure why this is being reported again, but....
Ice bubbles reveal biggest rise in CO2 for 800,000 years
The Independent - The rapid rise in greenhouse gases over the past century is unprecedented in at least 800,000 years, according to a study of the oldest Antarctic ice core which highlights the reality of climate change.
Air bubbles trapped in ice for hundreds of thousands of years have revealed that humans are changing the composition of the atmosphere in a manner that has no known natural parallel.
Scientists at the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) in Cambridge have found there have been eight cycles of atmospheric change in the past 800,000 years when carbon dioxide and methane have risen to peak levels.
Each time, the world also experienced the relatively high temperatures associated with warm, inter-glacial periods, which were almost certainly linked with levels of carbon dioxide and possibly methane in the atmosphere.
However, existing levels of carbon dioxide and methane are far higher than anything seen during these earlier warm periods, said Eric Wolff of the BAS. ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmateo sleepy.
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 4978 Location: socialist corner, ottawa
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That wont shut up that lunny professor at Carleton. Though I guess thats his career talking on US TV and rightwing shows as 'proof' that global warming isn't related to humans... right he isn't even American *puke*. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Study Says Methane a New Climate Threat
Scientists Find New Global Warming 'Time Bomb' _ Methane Bubbling Up From Permafrost
AP - Global warming gases trapped in the soil are bubbling out of the thawing permafrost in amounts far higher than previously thought and may trigger what researchers warn is a climate time bomb.
Methane a greenhouse gas 23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide is being released from the permafrost at a rate five times faster than thought, according to a study being published Thursday in the journal Nature. The findings are based on new, more accurate measuring techniques.
"The effects can be huge," said lead author Katey Walter of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks said. "It's coming out a lot and there's a lot more to come out."
Scientists worry about a global warming vicious cycle that was not part of their already gloomy climate forecast: Warming already under way thaws permafrost, soil that has been continuously frozen for thousands of years. Thawed permafrost releases methane and carbon dioxide. Those gases reach the atmosphere and help trap heat on Earth in the greenhouse effect. The trapped heat thaws more permafrost and so on.
"The higher the temperature gets, the more permafrost we melt, the more tendency it is to become a more vicious cycle" ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
obscurantist wonk, snark, pedant
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 739
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did climate change cause civilization? | Quote: | Severe climate change was the main driver behind the birth of civilisation, a scientist said yesterday.
An increase in harsh, arid conditions across the globe around 5,000 years ago forced people to start living in stable communities around remaining water sources. The major shift in climate, caused by natural fluctuations in the Earth's orbit around the sun, weakened the monsoon systems in the northern hemisphere, where humans had previously enjoyed a fruitful hunter-gatherer existence.
"We can certainly say that the earliest civilisations arose on the backdrop of increasing aridity, which are driven by natural, global-scale changes in climate," said Nick Brooks of the University of East Anglia. ...
...Dr Brooks said his research turned traditional ideas of how the world's first civilisations - such as those in Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, the Indus Valley region and South America - on their head.
Many anthropologists think that civilisation was spread gradually among populations after it began in some part of the world. "A current popular theory is that the world's first civilisation developed because it could; the environment was relatively benign," said Dr Brooks. "This is based on the argument of the last 10,000 years being climatically very stable and quite conducive to flourishing of agriculture and large, urban civilisations."
But Dr Brooks argued that civilisation arose instead from environmental catastrophes. His work is focused on the Sahara region, where he says the cultural history shows that, around 5-10,000 years ago, the humid areas there abruptly changed into the Sahara desert we see today. ...
Dr Brooks said that the emergence of society was not a universally positive development. For a lot of people, life got harder. "We have increases in social inequality, hierarchy, organised violence and warfare," he said. ...
There was even a decrease in life expectancy in some areas....
Without the driving force of climate change, human societies might have evolved far more slowly, said Dr Brooks. ... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Around 4000BC theres a giant jump in human civilization nearly unexplainable using most evolutionary theories... This looks like a rather sad attempt at using climate change to explain it though, somehow managing to equate the evolution of society to people being forced to gather around water?
I'd want to see where his research is pulled from... The Mesopotanian region was not arid in the time frame he's referencing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nickbrooks Member
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 1 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:16 pm Post subject: Climate change and civilisation - paper |
|
|
The media coverage of this topic (see previous posts) refers to a talk I gave, which was in turn based on an academic paper in Quaternary International. The paper can be downloaded from my website (http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~e118/welcome.htm) - click on the "Publications" link on the right. There is plenty of evidence for regional aridification in the Mesopotamian region between about 6000 and 4000 years ago, although data from the southern Mesopotamian lowlands are scarce. _________________ http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~e118/welcome.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Norse of 60 Kokanee Kid

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3711
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by Norse of 60 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gram swaraj Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 71 Location: mon pays ce n'est pas un pays, c'est la terre
|
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Without the driving force of climate change, human societies might have evolved far more slowly, said Dr Brooks. ... |
Of course, the climate change now occurring will not necessarily result in the same things that happened before. For one thing, human populations are greater. It looks like many human societies will be having to readjust very rapidly, or fall apart, or disappear.
How much of climate change is irreversible? How are we certain it’s irreversible? How are we to respond to irreversible climate change? Or to irreversible runaway climate change? Who will choose hedonism, or malthusian fascism? At what point do we just give up? And then what?
For those like me with more idealistic tendencies, I think we have to look beyond the confines of the rational-scientific box. Climate change is forcing us to consider a very basic question: What does it mean to be a human being? ie, What am I? What is my relationship with other humans, and with all other living species? Based on the answer to these questions, how will I act?
I have Greenpeace to thank for one of the most important texts guiding me now, the story of the Rainbow Warrior, which includes the below: | Quote: | There was an old lady, from the "Cree" tribe, named "Eyes of Fire", who prophesied that one day, because of the white mans' or Yo-ne-gis' greed, there would come a time, when the fish would die in the streams, the birds would fall from the air, the waters would be blackened, and the trees would no longer be, mankind as we would know it would all but cease to exist.
There would come a time when the "keepers of the legend, stories, culture rituals, and myths, and all the Ancient Tribal Customs" would be needed to restore us to health.
[…]
They would show them that miracles can be accomplished to heal this world of its ills, and restore it to health and beauty.
The tasks of these "Warriors of the Rainbow" are many and great. There will be terrifying mountains of ignorance to conquer and they shall find prejudice and hatred. They must be dedicated, unwavering in their strength, and strong of heart. They will find willing hearts and minds that will follow them on this road of returning "Mother Earth" to beauty and plenty - once more.
The day will come, it is not far away. The day that we shall see how we owe our very existence to the people of all tribes that have maintained their culture and heritage. Those that have kept the rituals, stories, legends, and myths alive. It will be with this knowledge, the knowledge that they have preserved, that we shall once again return to "harmony" with Nature, Mother Earth, and mankind. It will be with this knowledge that we shall find our "Key to our Survival". |
Why not listen to some old Cree lady? We have to do as much as we ethically can to restore the planet. Maybe climate change will drive humanity to evolve once again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StikyMikey02 Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
amazing post
Valium
Cheap Valium
buy valium online
(Spam links removed by Tehanu) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 15978 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| We don't need Viagra on EnMasse, we always hold firm. And we don't need Valium because why would we want to calm down? Buh-bye! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Noise Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Land of Cowboys and Oil
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same guys (I assume, products are the same) have been spamming alot of boards recently.
Though I disagree entirely with you on this Tehanu:
| Quote: | | we don't need Valium |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leftcoastguy Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 5977 Location: Leftcoast
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tehanu
Don't be too hasty - we may need a supply of Valium for some people on the gun control thread.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1646 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
Guardian - Britain's leading scientists have challenged the US oil company ExxonMobil to stop funding groups that attempt to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change.
In an unprecedented step, the Royal Society, Britain's premier scientific academy, has written to the oil giant to demand that the company withdraws support for dozens of groups that have "misrepresented the science of climate change by outright denial of the evidence".
The scientists also strongly criticise the company's public statements on global warming, which they describe as "inaccurate and misleading".
In a letter earlier this month to Esso, the UK arm of ExxonMobil, the Royal Society cites its own survey which found that ExxonMobil last year distributed $2.9m to 39 groups that the society says misrepresent the science of climate change. ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanLuke Critical Observer

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1075 Location: Vancouver
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|