EnMasse Forum Index EnMasse
This place is all that is left.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   TATToday's Active Topics 
 ProfileProfile   Voting CentreVoting Centre   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
  Front PageFront Page Front Page SubmissionsFront Page Submissions LinksLinks Acceptable Use PolicyAcceptable Use Policy  DonateDonate 

 

 


Who's against the free exchange of ideas now?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> Election 2008
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RP.
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 513
Location: Ft. McMurray

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:44 pm    Post subject: Who's against the free exchange of ideas now? Reply with quote

Green Party Of Canada Threatens BUCKDOG BLOG With Lawsuit In Attempt To Suppress Freedom Of Speech!

Quote:
From: John Bennett
To: leftdog@hushmail.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:37:56 -0600

Please be informed that the if the video

Canadians Are Stupid!" - Elizabeth May

is not removed from your site with the hour the Green Party of Canada will seek means to prevent legal proceedings further slander.


John Bennett
Director of Communications
Green Party of Canada
(613) 562-4916 ext. 230
(Cell: 613) 291 6888
Fax: (613) 482-4632


I sure wouldn't want the Green Party of Canada seeking means to prevent legal proceedings further slander!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh my.

A blogger posts a link to a YouTube video, and receives a SLAPP threat.

Shall we tell him that this site has a link to the very same YouTube video? Maybe if the Green party starts getting all up on its hind legs with EM, a few Green-bots might realize what a dishonest master they serve.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senor Magoo wrote:
Oh my.

A blogger posts a link to a YouTube video, and receives a SLAPP threat.

Shall we tell him that this site has a link to the very same YouTube video? Maybe if the Green party starts getting all up on its hind legs with EM, a few Green-bots might realize what a dishonest master they serve.

No kidding!. The statement may not have been what she intended, but it is what she said (unless the audio was tampered with and I doubt that). eBay will likely hurt the Greens in the farce debate. Will another SLAPP be levied after the debate if she is again stupid enough to make a Hitler, Nazi, anti-abortion reference on camera?

What I still don't get is why Shavluk was given the boot. He is just as much a loose canon as eBay and I suspect she is less receptive to diverse opinion. Maybe she was worried about a possible leadership challenge?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny thing is, the video itself is nothing more than some audio of an interview and a few still images. Nobody's making any claims that could be construed as libelous.

Mind you, their legal eagle, Mr. Shirty, called it "slander" (pssst! The word you wanted was "libel"!)
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also being discussed here.

I don't get it. Are they saying that she didn't say this? If she went on to clarify her comments (I still don't know what the context was) then I could see them wanting the complete quote included.

Quote:
What I still don't get is why Shavluk was given the boot. He is just as much a loose canon as eBay and I suspect she is less receptive to diverse opinion. Maybe she was worried about a possible leadership challenge?

Mr. Green

Yes, I suspect it was the loose cannon problem. As I've said, in hundreds of posts here, Shavluk didn't say anything that I can recall as being anti-Semitic. Anti a few other things, sure ... but not anti-Semitic.


Last edited by Tehanu on Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Norse of 60
Kokanee Kid


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3711

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Throwing gas on a small fire only makes it bigger and she is only attracting more negative attention. I still don't know exactly what their platform stands for but if recent media coverage is any indication they stand for:

*shilling for the liberals
*whining
*censorship

ETA: the Greens should have kept shavvy around to make May look relatively sane in comparison.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Update on the blogger's correspondence with John Bennett from the Green Party. He's threatening a national press release, and he's also apparently contacted his own lawyer.

Popcorn

Quote:
-------------------------- (To which I replied) ----------------

Dear Mr. Bennett
You are attempting to shoot the messenger here. I am merely
reporting ... as is my right as a citizen journalist ... an item
that is CURRENTLY POSTED ON YOUTUBE ... with the following URL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIxmfBPrptM

I did NOT post this item on youtube NOR did I produce it.
Therefore your threats to me as a citizen journalist have been
turned over to my solicitor.

Should I receive an apology from you within the hour, I will take
no further action against the Green Party of Canada which would
include:
1) A nationwide news release which includes the text of your
threatening email to me,
2) Details which show that I had NOTHING to do with the production
nor posting of the item in question on youtube,
3) That as a citizen journalist, the Green Party of Canada is
attempting to suppress my freedom of speech,
4) A blog posting itemizing what has occured here including your
threatening email to me.

Should your apology to me be received within the hour as I stated,
I will take no further action against the Green Party of Canada

Leftdog
Regina

------------------------ (To which Ms. May's representative replied --------
From: John Bennett
To: leftdog@hushmail.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:11:13 -0600

You are knowingly asisting in slander get it down or you face legal action us & TVO.

Journalism is more than repeating. You have a responsibility to verify the facts.

Get get it down now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, the full quote is from a TVO "The Agenda" broadcast in February 2007. Available here.

I'll try and dig out the context.

ETA: Well, I'm listening to the post-show discussion and about two-thirds in Elizabeth May just said (obviously joking):

EMay: "How about the people who buy Hummers?"

Steve Paikin (?): "You want to put them in jail, right, Elizabeth?"

EMay: "No, I want them shot! Jail isn't good enough for them. I'm a politician who'll never get elected, what can I tell you."

Wow.

She goes on to clarify that she doesn't want them in jail, just to pay a premium at the time they buy the vehicle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome to federal politics eBay. Welcome
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Norse of 60
Kokanee Kid


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3711

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tehanu wrote:

She goes on to clarify that she doesn't want them in jail, just to pay a premium at the time they buy the vehicle.


An average model Hummer goes about $70K and almost $170 to fill the tank. I don't think a 'premium' is going to scare someone off already willing to pay those prices.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, here we go. It was in the MP3 soundfile of the broadcast, not the post-show video discussion. This was with a panel of six or so people (May is the only woman) from across the political spectrum.

To preface, I will say that she does sound articulate and makes some good points. She does know her stuff on the environment, even if I don't agree with everything she says. It's actually an interesting discussion about the environment, the economy and whether economic development should be measured by the GDP.

I was interested to hear that she thinks there needs to be a carbon tax system AND cap-and-trade (along with other initiatives).

Here's what I was able to get from the audio (at about 38:30 minutes in).

Quote:
Q: First of all, if all of you seem to agree that environmental costs need to be internalized, and a carbon tax is one way of doing that, why is there so little political will for a carbon tax? That's the first part [of a two-part question].

May: [starts off by the sounds of it away from the microphone] All the other politicians are scared to death to mention the word tax, and they [I?] think Canadians are stupid, and cannot, and I fundamentally agree with that assessment, but most politicians think that if you say we're going to put on a carbon tax, and reduce your income tax, they don't think they can sell it. It's all about votes.


There you go. The complete context. Another guy jumped in right after that with a comment on regionalism, especially in terms of Alberta, and how a carbon tax would play there.

Threatening to sue now seems even more ludicrous. The YouTube clip is somewhat inflammatory, but it's not as though she contradicted herself or clarified in the full clip.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Norse of 60
Kokanee Kid


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3711

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder if/when the MSM will pick up on this little gem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Threatening to sue now seems even more ludicrous. The YouTube clip is somewhat inflammatory, but it's not as though she contradicted herself or clarified in the full clip.

And she has had time to clarify those statements.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suspect that this might have been an overzealous "Communications Director" who is perhaps even now getting his ear chewed off, because I doubt very much that EMay wants this to hit the MSM. Especially since the clip is a year and a half old. Sometimes ignoring things is the way to go.

I am no lawyer but I really don't think there's anything that could be litigated here.

I just did a quick Google News and it has hit the National Post blogs:

Quote:
... Elizabeth May sometimes talks faster than an auctioneer on a caffeine buzz, so it’s extremely hard to tell whether she says “I think Canadians are stupid” or “they think Canadians are stupid." But neither sounds good given that Ms. May continues on to say “and I fundamentally agree with that assessment.”

Buckdog’s motives are clear, but in his defense, what Ms. May was trying to say really isn’t. Still, the Green Party responded swiftly with a lawsuit demanding that “if the video ‘Canadians Are Stupid!” -- Elizabeth May’ is not removed from your site within the hour the Green Party of Canada will seek means to prevent legal proceedings further slander,” a statement that in itself is not a model of clarity. The blogger responded that he was just posting a YouTube clip. Still, he eventually complied and took it down.

Of course, Ms. May has every right to demand that false and damaging charges against her be retracted. But this was a direct audio recording of the Green leader speaking on a TVO panel. And rather than trying to clear the record with some reasonable explanation (though, it’s hard to see what that might be), Ms. May takes a page from Stephen Harper’s litigious political playbook and reflexively threatens to sue -- a day after she dropped another lawsuit against broadcasters for refusing to let her participate in televised debates. Given the Tories’ success with that tactic so far, it would be hard to call that stupid.


Not to be picky, but the Greens didn't respond with a lawsuit. They responded with an email threatening legal action.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tehanu wrote:
There you go. The complete context.


Yes, but it's still not clear what the assessment is that the agrees with. I still think it was the one posed in the question, namely "if all of you seem to agree that environmental costs need to be internalized, and a carbon tax is one way of doing that."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The interesting part of this isn't the comment itself. I wouldn't say it matters all that much whether she said "I" (which is what I heard) or "they" (which is what the Green-bots will insist she said).

What's interesting is the laughably heavy-handed, chest-beating threats by a man who doesn't seem to know the difference between libel and slander, and who seems to think he's the bad guy from the season finale of "24" ("you have exactly one hour...").

Strange silence from the supporters, though.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senor Magoo wrote:
What's interesting is the laughably heavy-handed, chest-beating threats by a man who doesn't seem to know the difference between libel and slander, and who seems to think he's the bad guy from the season finale of "24" ("you have exactly one hour...").

Strange silence from the supporters, though.


You talkin to me? I agree with you. (Yeah, strange, I know.)

And I'm not a supporter of May or the Greens. I just think that in this case her train of thought and her mouth were really badly out of sync.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hehe. If you're not a cheerleader for May or the Greens then I wasn't really talking to you. If you think she probably just misspoke (as we all do from time to time) then I agree right back.

But their tough-guy damage control action plan was to die for. "Get get it down now."

LOL! Sir yes Sir!
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JQuestio
Member


Joined: 09 Dec 2007
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree it's wrong to try to silence people with threats. Even if someone twisted what was said into something much worse than how it was intended so what? Politicians present the facts out of context and twist stuff all the time.

I hope this is just one inexperienced Green Party member who had a serious lapse of judgment, because generally speaking I agree with the Green Parties environmental concerns and when they do stuff like this it will be used to undermine the credibility of everything the Greens stand for.

Reading through this discussion here and on other message boards and trying to make sense of what was said, I am wondering if E May might have said “I don't think Canadians are stupid“

I can't watch the video, but here is what I have put together from what other people have said about the context of these statements.

Quote:
Q: First of all, if all of you seem to agree that environmental costs need to be internalized, and a carbon tax is one way of doing that, why is there so little political will for a carbon tax? That's the first part [of a two-part question].


Quote:
May: [starts off by the sounds of it away from the microphone] All the other politicians are scared to death to mention the word tax, and they [I?] think Canadians are stupid, and cannot, and I fundamentally agree with that assessment, but most politicians think that if you say we're going to put on a carbon tax, and reduce your income tax, they don't think they can sell it. It's all about votes.


She said the following afterwards:

Quote:
I don't think Canadians buy the idea that John Baird tried to sell the committee the other day, that it was economic ruin to implement Kyoto, it's nonsense. And I think people could except the idea -- ya, I like the idea of lower income taxes, I like the idea of payroll taxes. Let's put taxes on things we don't want like greenhouse gases.


A babbler who watched this episode said that when she said "I fundamentally agree with that assessment" she was looking at one of the panel members who previously spoke and was referencing what he said.

Maybe these comments might be more coherent if E May actually said “iduht think Canadians are stupid”

When people talk fast, and sometimes the word "don't" is just a dull duhnt sound in the back of their nasal cavity.

Just a thought ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let the CHP in the debates! Given that the evil consortium has thrown out the rules for entering the debate (i.e. the Greens not having 5% of the vote or candidates in every riding), why exclude the CHP? To exclude them would be an arbitrary use of power by the backroom men and woman. I expect to see the Greens continue the fight for fairness.

http://www.chp.ca/en/news/speak_09-11-2008.html

Quote:
Request to Include CHP in Leader's Debate

Mr. Robert Hurst, CTV News

September 11, 2008

Dear Mr. Hurst,

I am writing to you, as Chair of the Broadcast Consortium, to request that the Christian Heritage Party of Canada be included in the Leaders’ Debates during the 2008 general election.

The CHP is the next-largest registered political party after the Green Party—which has now been included in the debates.

I would like to call to your attention a number of facts which support the CHP’s request:

* Like the Green Party, the CHP is eligible for and receives some support from the taxpayers—in our case, in the form of tax credits for donations. The level and kind of support is different for the two parties, because the Green Party, by flooding the ballot with “paper candidates” in 2004, achieved the 5% threshold (which, by the way, the Ontario Superior Court ruled unconstitutional) to qualify for the per-vote subsidy.

1. the four parties already in the House, at the same time they voted themselves $30 million a year of taxpayers’ money (inflation indexed), cut the maximum amount smaller parties could receive from donors, from $5,000 to $1,000
2. tying the taxpayer subsidy to the number of votes received is retrospective, and a formula for preserving the status quo
3. the exclusion of newer parties from news coverage, debates, etc. impairs their ability to attract votes; so a subsidy based on votes creates a vicious circle of exclusion
4. basing the subsidy on ballot-box performance makes the parties the focus of the subsidy, rather than the need and right of the electorate to have adequate information about all options available to them.

These facts make the total number of votes previously received irrelevant in the issue of getting information to the public.
* In a survey done by CV Marketing Research, 71% of respondents agreed with the CHP’s platform, when it was read to them without a party identifier. But that same survey indicated that only 24% had ever heard the name of the CHP—yet 55% made positive statements when asked "what they thought the party stood for" (CHP was the only party that got more than half positive responses to that question.) ......

1—A democracy requires an informed electorate; and 2—Voters have a need and an indefeasible right to have access to adequate information about all the options available to them.

“Freedom of the Press” cannot be regarded as real freedom when it means that everyone has the right to publish—if they have the $10 million required to own a printing press and distribution facilities; or if they have a license to broadcast. It cannot be considered “equal access” when even the public broadcaster fails to inform its audience fully and impartially about all the parties available.

As a former journalist, I am an ardent defender of freedom of the news media… but I am also sensitive to the obligation of the news media to give the public the fullest possible access to the information needed to be well-informed in their role as citizens.

Thank you for giving this request your consideration. In bringing these facts before you, I also request that you table this request before the whole Consortium.

Sincerely,

Ron Gray

National Leader Christian Heritage Party of Canada
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Reading through this discussion here and on other message boards and trying to make sense of what was said, I am wondering if E May might have said “I don't think Canadians are stupid“


Nice try.

And when John Crosbie told Sheila Copps to "just quiet down, baby" maybe what he actually said was "I respect you as a woman and a politician and I concede your point".

Dude, are your ears for decoration only?

Meanwhile, it's becoming evident that despite many, many blogs and message boards posting a link to EMay's belief in the stupidity of Canadians, Buckdog's blog is the ONLY blog being threatened with a SLAPP suit.

Wouldn't you expect them to go after anyone publishing a link to the video? Or gosh, maybe the guy who freely admits that he's the one who made the video and uploaded it to YouTube?

I'm still waiting for a Green-bot to explain all this. Green-bots! Come out, come out, whereever you are! You all had plenty to say when you believed that Lizzie was being silenced. Come tell us what you think of bloggers being silenced.
Back to top
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WTF??? Can "guests" post now? OR is "Guest" a new user-name? If so, why is it shown as "Anonymous" on the TAT page?
_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mr. McWho
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, this is kind of weird.

Can anybody see me?? Smile
Back to top
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wasn't logged in.

But Heph's guess seems correct.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, *now* it says Mr McWho...
_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was a box for me to enter a username that I didn't notice the first time around (because I hadn't realized I was posting without being logged in).

I probably could have entered pretty much any name that wasn't already taken. Log out and try it!
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting.
Back to top
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The one right above was me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanü
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:48 pm    Post subject: Enough! Reply with quote

Identity theft. All the cool kids are doing it.
Back to top
RP.
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 513
Location: Ft. McMurray

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anonymous, you haven't come to blow up our yellow van have you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu-lite
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bizarre. I have alerted Steve-GTG and am taking a look at the back-end settings ...
Back to top
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah. It's only this forum and when I set it up last night I didn't realize one needed to change "Public" to "Registered" in the forum settings. Should be okay now.

Hee. Maybe we'll periodically make certain forums "Public" and see how long it takes for them to get ... er ... creative additions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RP.
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 513
Location: Ft. McMurray

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone want to drop John Bennet a line?

aajb@rogers.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TVO weighs in. No planned lawsuit, no editing or doctoring of the recording.

Seems Mr. Bennett might have been showing off a bit and talking tough — and lying — when he threatened the original creator of the video with legal action from TVO.

Also seems he was maybe making it up a little when he insisted — by lying — that the audio track had been doctored.

Will Mr. Bennett now do the honourable thing, and fall on his sword? Or will he sputter and bluster and insist — while lying — that TVO has its facts wrong?

And I remain sad that the loud and proud Green supporters, who had plenty to say about free speech last week, can't be here to enjoy their party's introduction into the big leagues. I trust that the Green-bots who can't seem to find the courage to address this are outside, right now, painting their house orange.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I just watched the video of the Agenda episode and in it is abundantly clear that the assessment May was agreeing with was made by one of the previous panelists because she turns to them and gestures to one of them as she says it. But I can't tell for sure if it was Robert Costanza's "invisible foot" comment, David Robertson's comment on the opportunity of Kyoto, or Andrew Coyne's on using the market as a social institution to change behavior because the camera angle is too tight to see who she gestured to. In any case, May very clearly did not say or mean or agree that she thinks Canadians are stupid.

There are many things to rightly ridicule and hold May and her party accountable for, including Bennett's response and May's deals with Dion, but this is not one of them.

I have zero tolerance for putting words into peoples' mouths and smearing them for things that they did not say or mean. A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves over this, but I doubt many will be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Transplant, as you'll see above I've been willing to give Elizabeth May the benefit of the doubt around that comment, and put a fair bit of effort into finding the context of it. What I find highly problematic is her communications director threatening a blogger with a lawsuit for linking to a YouTube video.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tehanu wrote:
Transplant, as you'll see above I've been willing to give Elizabeth May the benefit of the doubt around that comment, and put a fair bit of effort into finding the context of it. What I find highly problematic is her communications director threatening a blogger with a lawsuit for linking to a YouTube video.


Me too, Tehanu, and there can be no argument that that was indeed really, really stupid, but that's another issue and it is entirely fair game to jump on them for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
but that's another issue


Actually, it's the subject of this thread. It's THIS issue. What May said or didn't say isn't all that important.

What's important is that her party threatened a blogger with legal action for having the temerity to post a web link to a video she didn't want people to see. Her party lied when they insisted that the audio track had been edited, and they lied when they pretended that TVO was preparing a lawsuit against the creator of the video.

In the real world, making a web link would be the rough equivalent of saying "You should really go see that art show" or "look over there". That May and her party think that they should be able to use the threat of a SLAPP lawsuit to prevent Canadians from making a link to content on the internet simply demonstrates that all their whining about free speech is just more lies.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CWW
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 549
Location: North central Edmonton

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm going to side with Magoo on this one... this smacks of that scumbag Micheal Savages' attempt to get Media Matters for America to sever links on their site to video of him making some disgustingly racist remarks on his program.

Fair use, my friends.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CWW wrote:
I'm going to side with Magoo on this one...


I'm not disagreeing with Magoo, he's right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Her party lied when they insisted that the audio track had been edited, and they lied when they pretended that TVO was preparing a lawsuit against the creator of the video.

Doing politics differently Magoo. They threaten to sue when people are not allowed to hear her and threaten to sue if people are allowed to hear her. Basically, they just want to scare people into listening only to the good parts.

This is still making an incredible amount of play out here. The audio clip has been played over and over and over again and they have read Buckdog's conversations with the party several times on the air. I cannot say as I blame them.

The good thing is I know a few people that I can now get back to voting NDP after this hypocrisy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RP.
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 513
Location: Ft. McMurray

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, so here is a slowed down version of what she's said. To me, it's clear as can be that she says "I" and not "they." I don't think that is what others hear, but what it clarifies for me is that I'm doing well to take out my salt shaker when anyone who asserts that anything is "clear" or "obvious".

(sick of this yet? but I post this in spite of myself) Eh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5 minutes to midnight
Friendly co-dictator of the board


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1193
Location: The Okanagan, British Columbia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is year-old news. IMO, the clip was taken out of context, and in any case the whole thing was hashed over on rabble.ca over a year ago.

But, some meta-discussion, if you don't mind.

(trying to put together words)

Everyone here knows I support the Greens, but I don't come leaping into this forum trying to pass them off as the greatest thing since sliced bread every week. I contribute to other threads, I make my own amatuer political analysis from time to time, I try to contribute. So I find it straight up insulting, being called a "green-bot".

Yes, there are ridiculous partisans in the party who do think the Greens are the greatest thing since sliced bread. Yes, some post here, but you can find people like that everywhere, in every party.

Why am I bringing this up here? Because this is currently the 2nd longest thread on the site. This story has barely cracked the mainstream media (indeed, to my estimation, it mostly hasn't). The Ryan Sparrow incident (do you even know what I'm talking about?!), something which in my opinion deserves a little more effort in condemnation, gets no attention at all from posters here.

Its things like this that make accusations that I'm obsessed with defending the Green Party ring a little hollow, since some of you are far more obsessed with attacking it.
_________________
To be a true radical is to make hope possible, rather than despair convincing

- Raymond Williams
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RP. wrote:
OK, so here is a slowed down version of what she's said. To me, it's clear as can be that she says "I" and not "they."


Rrriiight.

So, if she said "I think Canadians are stupid" then why would she then add "...and I fundamentally agree with that assessment" since it would then be her own assessment she's agreeing with?

Anybody catch May on The Agenda tonight, I missed the first half hour. What does she say she said?

And yes, I'm way past sick of this nonsense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sparrow was suspended for his misdeed. When is Bennett going to be suspended for his lying and bullying tactics? At least the Conservatives are scummy because they can smell power coming their way. The Greens are acting like lying shitbags when they have absolutely no chance of accomplishing anything. That is the only way they are doing politics differently IMO.

The behaviour of the Greens on Thursday September 11th, 2008, was sickening, repulsive and just plain pathetic. It is bad enough that Greens are in denial about her saying "...I think Canadians are stupid...", but then to threaten lawsuits because people might hear what she said is anti-democratic. No wonder people are using the term Greenbot.

It is also stupid to think that you can suppress the audio clip after it hit the "information super highway" (23 ski doo). And the Conservatives are still screaming about this particularly since the Greenbots said that the audio was tampered with in some secret Conservative plot. Rolling Eyes This is not old news.

Perhaps the most amazing part of this is that Buckdog was able to understand what the fuck this meant:

Quote:
Please be informed that the if the video

Canadians Are Stupid!" - Elizabeth May

is not removed from your site with the hour the Green Party of Canada will seek means to prevent legal proceedings further slander.


Or this:

Quote:
You are knowingly asisting in slander get it down or you face legal action us & TVO.

I ain't no expert on robots, but I bet that's how a robot (from the 1960s) responds.

And yeah, I am sick of this Green hypocrisy too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
transplant
Starting Over Again


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: somewhere between here and there

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Embarassed I just watched the clip of May from tonight and what was it Emily Latella used to say....

Never mind. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So, if she said "I think Canadians are stupid" then why would she then add "...and I fundamentally agree with that assessment" since it would then be her own assessment she's agreeing with?

Perhaps it is the same reason for this:

Quote:
means to prevent legal proceedings further slander.

Or maybe it was the same reason she made reference to appeasing the Nazis. She put her foot in her mouth, didn't come clean about it, they threatened someone and are now trying to spin it away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Doug
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1042

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's especially funny because the truth can never be slander - and her words are right there on the video for everyone to hear. It's dumb to even threaten to sue someone for that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, 5MTM, you would be the last person I would characterize as a "Green-bot," and in fact the people I would characterize as knee-jerk Green supporters haven't been seen around here of late. I've always found you very thoughtful in your opinions, and just as plenty of us NDP supporters criticize our party, you have as well.

It it through the criticism of their supporters that parties get feedback and can grow and improve.

I think many of us are reacting strongly because we were very unimpressed at yet another attack on Jack Layton from Elizabeth May, when Harper got off quite lightly. It feels as though Layton's her favourite target when she lets others off the hook. It gets tiresome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cartman
Beyond cuddly


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8635
Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to be clear, I do not think 5MTM is a greenbot and I do think every party has their bots. Even EM has a bot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> Election 2008 All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
TATToday's Active Topics


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group