EnMasse Forum Index EnMasse
This place is all that is left.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   TATToday's Active Topics 
 ProfileProfile   Voting CentreVoting Centre   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
  Front PageFront Page Front Page SubmissionsFront Page Submissions LinksLinks Acceptable Use PolicyAcceptable Use Policy  DonateDonate 

 

 


Staying the Course in Afghanistan
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> The Middle East and Central Asia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

However, the video is not bothering the Taliban much. No surprise there. Their expectation of US soldier conduct in Afghanistan is necessarily already low.

Taliban say Marine tape won't hurt Afghanistan talks

Quote:
Despite concerns when the video emerged that it would not help efforts to build confidence among the warring parties, a Taliban spokesman said although the images were shocking, the tape would not affect talks or a possible prisoner release.

"We know that our country is occupied," he said. "This is not a political process, so the video will not harm our talks and prisoner exchange because they are at the preliminary stage."


Not much one can say to that. On the other hand, I don't see this bolstering the US/Karzai case.
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sparqui
Dog tired


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 5155
Location: Winnipeg

PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Taliban spokesperson sounds very thoughtful and rational.

And in contrast, we have this from one obnoxious US cheerleader:

Dana Loesch cheered for it in order to fuel the unhinged Muslim hatred that has become a staple of modern day right-wing media
_________________
“If my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a tractor.”

-- Gilles Duceppe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Such a tempest in a tea pot. To me, it shows clearly just how contradictory we are, how hypocritical. Running around like nuns in a whorehouse because some kids pissed on some dead bodies... oh how horrible, how bestial, how unlike us, ... while overlooking the fact those kids just sent hot metal into the bodies of those very corpses.

Any soldier who has seen action is traumatized. See enough action and you probably are no longer "sane". How does anyone find within him or herself the capacity and ability to slaughter another human? Our kids are brought up on "love thy neighbour" , "turn the other cheek", "do a good deed every day"... then we send them out and expect them to murder other people... often the only way they can is by dehumanizing the enemy... and the dehumanization is encouraged in basic training, the enemy is called "gook" or "charlie" or "hajii" or "camel fucker", or "goat sucker" or...reduced to something other, something less, something NOT human...except then you blow his chest apart and that's real blood and real splinters of bone and...you have to reinforce the dehumanization so you pee on the body...after all, he'd have killed you, he may have killed your best friend, and what about public decapitation and dragging "our" dead through the streets and spitting on them and...

and Hilary seems to see nothing at all wrong with twisting the minds of young people and turning them into assassins willing to kill other people, sees nothing wrong in drones dropping death on wedding parties, sees nothing wrong with inflicting lasting PTSD on an increasingly heartbreaking number of young people but ohmigawsh she's offended and shocked that they pee'd on the corpses.

We just do not want to let go of the bullshit, all that "glory of war" and "badge of courage" and "finest hour" crap. We don't want to admit that war is insane and the insanity is contagious.

Pee'ing on them is nothing at all compared to blowing them to grue. What is truly horrific and unforgiveable is what was done to the minds and souls of the ones pee'ing that prompted them to whip'er out and drain the snake.

The real obscenity is that they were in someone else's country with the intent to kill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
unionist
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 2452
Location: Montréal

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anne Cameron hits the spot. We are supposed to be shocked by the actions of the lowest-level cannon fodder on the military food chain, but not by Obama and his military chiefs who continue the occupation. We are supposed to be shocked by desecration, but not by assassination. Let's keep our eye on the big picture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sibjyn
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 1120
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

unionist wrote:
Anne Cameron hits the spot. We are supposed to be shocked by the actions of the lowest-level cannon fodder on the military food chain, but not by Obama and his military chiefs who continue the occupation. We are supposed to be shocked by desecration, but not by assassination. Let's keep our eye on the big picture.


Pissing on corpses is progressive now? Who'da thunk it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
voice of the damned
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 6148
Location: slandered, libeled

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sibjyn wrote:
unionist wrote:
Anne Cameron hits the spot. We are supposed to be shocked by the actions of the lowest-level cannon fodder on the military food chain, but not by Obama and his military chiefs who continue the occupation. We are supposed to be shocked by desecration, but not by assassination. Let's keep our eye on the big picture.


Pissing on corpses is progressive now? Who'da thunk it.


Well, I think there's a useful distinction between saying that something is progressive, and saying that it's relatively low on the list of things that progressives should be concerned about.

Even our criminal law doesn't treat desecration of a dead body anywhere near as seriously as it treats the original creation of the dead body. And, as Anne Cameron seems to be pointing out, in the particular case under discussion you've got the phenonenon of people who aren't otherwise much perturbed by the endless carnage suddenly waking up and taking notice simply because somebody pissed on an already dead corpse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sibjyn
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 1120
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I would agree that murder is taken more seriously than desecration of a corpse, but the law does take it seriously. Section 182(b) of the criminal code.

Just seems to be that ignoring things like this is somewhat akin to arguing that the feds should not have pursued charges of income tax evasion against Al Capone, since evasion is not nearly as bad as murder, which he was also guilty of.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
voice of the damned
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 6148
Location: slandered, libeled

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sibjyn wrote:
Well I would agree that murder is taken more seriously than desecration of a corpse, but the law does take it seriously. Section 182(b) of the criminal code.

Just seems to be that ignoring things like this is somewhat akin to arguing that the feds should not have pursued charges of income tax evasion against Al Capone, since evasion is not nearly as bad as murder, which he was also guilty of.


Well, the feds themselves were probaby more ticked off about Al Capone's murders, but for a variety of reasons, couldn't pursue those charges successfully.

A better comparison would be yawning away through descriptions of the Tate-LaBianca murders, but then suddenly bolting into outrage when you hear that the Manson family had desecrated a door with the victims' blood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, Patty Krenwinkle did write "Healter Skelter" instead of "Helter Skelter," so some amount of outrage ought to be expected.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slumberjack
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 923
Location: squelch~~big waves and high smiles from the stomach and intestine of capital.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sibjyn wrote:
Just seems to be that ignoring things like this is somewhat akin to arguing that the feds should not have pursued charges of income tax evasion against Al Capone, since evasion is not nearly as bad as murder, which he was also guilty of.


It's all fine and well to punish the little wrong doers...no one is saying that...but the ones expressing the most outrage as if their own precious sensititivies were shocked over these incidents...if you toss them a rope and say go hang yourself in the process for 'your' outrages, we'd get blank stares out of them just before they'd call in a drone or a torturer or something to deal with our impudence. But maybe you're grinding that axe the wrong way to see the point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The video of US marines urinating on Afghan corpses does not shock me. Though their behavior is disgusting and unacceptable, I find the public's reaction to this video far more troubling. People are not outraged that there are dead Afghans; they are outraged at the manner in which the dead are treated. This is indicative of our culture's tolerance for war and war crimes – as long as they are done in a gentlemanly fashion.


The marines urination video doesn't show the real war crime
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
unionist
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 2452
Location: Montréal

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly. That's why this pathetic puppet, Karzai, who sold his country into ruin to the western saviours, makes grandiose declarations about desecration of corpses. He's responsible for all the slaughter, on both sides, involving the occupation forces (because they installed him and he demands that they stay). He's not very well placed to express outrage when the U.S. forces act according to their racist and imperialist character. They can piss all over his country, and his response is: "More, sir, please!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
voice of the damned
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 6148
Location: slandered, libeled

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Well, Patty Krenwinkle did write "Healter Skelter" instead of "Helter Skelter," so some amount of outrage ought to be expected.


Maybe she was trying to avoid copyright infringement?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sibjyn
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 1120
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

voice of the damned wrote:
Quote:
Well, Patty Krenwinkle did write "Healter Skelter" instead of "Helter Skelter," so some amount of outrage ought to be expected.


Maybe she was trying to avoid copyright infringement?


Probably just a typo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sibjyn
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 1120
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

unionist wrote:
Exactly. That's why this pathetic puppet, Karzai, who sold his country into ruin to the western saviours, makes grandiose declarations about desecration of corpses. He's responsible for all the slaughter, on both sides, involving the occupation forces (because they installed him and he demands that they stay). He's not very well placed to express outrage when the U.S. forces act according to their racist and imperialist character. They can piss all over his country, and his response is: "More, sir, please!"


Cut the guy some slack, he's got a lot on his legislative agenda to deal with before he can get around to banning snowmobiles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to admit to being confused here.

Are you trolling rabble now, Sibjyn, or EnMasse?
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The Evil Twin
Stoned Immaculate


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3746
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leaked NATO report surprises some dummies, even though the conclusions should have been obvious for a while

Quote:
Published on Wednesday, February 1, 2012 by The Guardian/UK
NATO Prediction of Taliban Victory in Afghanistan Is Immensely Damaging
The NATO report on the Taliban and the timing of the leak have serious negative implications on a range of fronts

by Simon Tisdall
The leaked NATO report predicting eventual Taliban victory in Afghanistan is immensely damaging. Its potential impact is akin to that of a hand grenade carelessly rolled across the floor of a crowded room. The resulting mayhem, if it explodes, could be both extensive and indiscriminate. Little wonder NATO spokesmen and Pakistan's foreign minister are fervently insisting the report is a dud.
A leaked NATO report predicts that the Taliban with take over in Afghanistan when NATO forces withdraw. (Photo: Corbis)

Even if the document is merely a discussion paper, based on raw data compiled from prisoner interrogations, its mere existence gives comfort to the enemy, to use the old phrase. Its headline finding – that the Taliban, backed by Pakistan, will return to power in Afghanistan once foreign forces finally leave in 2014 – will come as no surprise to critics of the war. They have glumly predicted precisely that outcome for some time.

But the fact that senior Americans inside NATO appear to share this view, and that they - or French colleagues keen to justify the recently announced early French withdrawal - have allowed their conclusions to find their way into the hands of the media, has seriously negative implications on a range of fronts.

Politically speaking, the timing could hardly be worse. Leon Panetta, the US defence secretary, is due in Brussels on Thursday for the first top-level NATO meeting since Barack Obama unveiled proposals to cut the US troop presence in Europe by half. This would have been enough by itself to ensure an uncomfortable visit. Now Panetta may face a full-blown crisis over the future of NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.

The sudden, unilateral decision by the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, to bring forward the departure of France's contingent by a year after an Afghan soldier killed four French troops last month has angered other coalition members. Coincidentally or not, the leaking of the report might be seen as helpful in justifying Sarkozy's decision.

Whatever the truth of the leak, France's accelerated retreat has raised fears that other panicky NATO allies may follow suit in a disorderly rush for the exit. Even Britain, Washington's most loyal satrap, has let it be known that it will not be left "holding the baby" in Helmand province as others pull out.

The leaked report, undermining political will and eroding military morale, renders all these issues more problematic. It also raises a question mark over the NATO heads of government summit in Chicago in May, when Obama is hoping to celebrate achievements in Afghanistan, Libya and elsewhere as part of the warm-up to his November re-election bid.

_________________
I can't support bike lanes. Roads are built for buses, cars, and trucks. My heart bleeds when someone gets killed, but it's their own fault at the end of the day. - Assclown Rob Ford
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kind'a sort'a makes a person want to slap her forehead and yell "DUH!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ronb
mocker


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2627
Location: Blackroof country, no gold pavement, tired starling

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does this mean Harper will start referring to Sarkozy as Taliban Nick?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Western forces shot dead 16 civilians including nine children in southern Kandahar province on Sunday, Afghan officials said, in a rampage that witnesses said was carried out by American soldiers who were laughing and appeared drunk.



US Soldiers Open Fire on Afghan Civilians in Rogue Attack


I like that; "rogue attack" rather than the regular A-OK massacres of civilians.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slumberjack
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 923
Location: squelch~~big waves and high smiles from the stomach and intestine of capital.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CNN spent the day juxtaposing this crime against the deaths of US soldiers recently as blowback for Koran burnings. Troubling yes and all that...part of the tit for tat of war...its all so terrible...and no doubt the enemy will use it to their advantage...yadda yadda. And then, faces beaming....like three days in a row of positive territory on Wall Street.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From
Glenn Greenwald at Salon:

NPR and NYT on Americans v. Afghans

Quote:
The New York Times yesterday conveyed important and exciting evidence of American progress in Afghanistan which I believe we can and should all find inspiring; it concerns the reasons the protests in Afghanistan over the slaughter of 16 villagers by a U.S. soldier were not as intense as feared:

Many observers say, the Americans have had a lot of practice at apologizing for carnage, accidental and otherwise, and have gotten better at doing it quickly and convincingly.

I don’t mind admitting that I beamed with nationalistic pride when I learned of our country’s impressive evolution: our nation’s government is so practiced in “apologizing for carnage” that it’s becoming a perfected art.

...NPR’s Inskeep explained the underlying reason why Afghans, in contrast to Americans, appear to care more about the mere burning of Korans than these heinous deaths:


INSKEEP: Human life is already cheap, is what you’re saying and religion is something that’s a little more intense.

Totally: to those primitive, excessively religious Afghans, “human life is cheap,” in contrast to Americans, who “have a lot of practice at apologizing for carnage.” Chandrasekaran, a good reporter, did explain that Afghans have “become accustomed to news of Afghan civilians dying at the hands of American forces in the middle of the night” and that this most recent massacre is therefore nothing aberrational for them. But that’s the point: there is a country here whose government is continuously extinguishing innocent human life, whose policies are grounded in the belief that “human life is already cheap,” and whose population is largely indifferent when it happens. That country is not Afghanistan.

_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote



I don't suppose Omar Khadr has tried the "I was distressed because all those US soldiers were trying to kill me" defence.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right now I'm reading "King Rat"...it's very interesting and a tad upsetting, trying to hold in my head the WW2 story line and the slaughter in Afghanistan...

nothing has changed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

"Release me, please!" Bowe screams at the camera. "I'm begging you – bring me home!"

Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl arrived in Afghanistan at the worst possible moment, just as President Barack Obama had ordered the first troop surge in the spring of 2009. Rather than withdraw from a disastrous and increasingly deadly war started by his predecessor, the new commander in chief had decided to escalate the conflict, tripling the number of troops to 100,000 and employing a counterinsurgency strategy that had yet to demonstrate any measurable success.

To many on Obama's staff, who had been studying Lessons in Disaster, a book about America's failure in Vietnam, the catastrophe to come seemed almost preordained. "My God," his deputy national security adviser Tom Don­ilon said at the time. "What are we getting this guy into?" Over the next three years, 13,000 Americans would be killed or wounded in Afghanistan – more than during the previous eight years of war under George W. Bush.




America's Last Prisoner of War
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, Bergdahl was home schooled:

Quote:
"Because command where too stupid to make up there minds of what to do," he wrote, "we where left to sit out in the middle of no where with no sopport to come till late mourning the next day."


_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fidel
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 812

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not good. Not good at all.
_________________
Democracy should more appropriately be referred to as Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. - George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The charge that Canada was militarily too weak for Kandahar is hardly new. But this was often blamed on the reluctance of our allies to help us out.

However, what's striking in some of these new accounts is the sheer doggedness of Canadian optimism when it came to our Afghan mission, not to mention our paucity of solid intelligence in the field.

In his fascinating memoir, Cables From Kabul: The Inside Story of the West's Afghanistan Campaign, Britain's former Afghan ambassador Sherard Cowper-Coles marvels at Canada's cheery boosterism for the war.

He portrays Canada's top civilian on the scene, Chris Alexander, then a former ambassador and top UN official, now a Conservative MP and parliamentary secretary to the minister of defence, as being "among the most persuasive of the optimists, and in many ways the golden boy of the international effort in Afghanistan."



Canada in Kandahar, some allies weren't impressed


At least nobody (on either side) said, "The boys will be home by Christmas."
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slumberjack
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 923
Location: squelch~~big waves and high smiles from the stomach and intestine of capital.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
However, what's striking in some of these new accounts is the sheer doggedness of Canadian optimism when it came to our Afghan mission, not to mention our paucity of solid intelligence in the field.

This doesn't come as a surprise to me. During my seven years at NDHQ I couldn't help but to come away from the experience with an impression that critical thinking within the organization as a whole was a scarce commodity, and seeing first hand what little of it that did exist entirely invested into the many ways of saying yes in order to please one's superiors; what with upward mobility being heavily dependent upon the favour of superiors. Gainsaying at a problem was indicative of someone who needed counselling for a lack of institutionalized flair, if they kept at it beyond the barely tolerated one or two inconvenient questions permitted. It seemed that no one wanted to hear about obstacles or problems in any event, only plausible solutions that were sufficient enough to be passed up the chain for politicians to digest and regurgitate to the public. The paucity of solid intelligence was routinely and openly announced within the organization, as they would often send out general messages asking for CF members with any capability whatsoever in any of the local languages to identify themselves. As I mostly knew little beyond the standard curse words in Farsi, I didn't think it would have been particularly helpful.

But this article should be seen as a bitter pill for them to swallow, coming from one of the foremost cheerleaders of the Canadian war effort in Afghanistan all these years; demonstrating that there's no loyalty among thugs where it involves careerism.
_________________
There is this old notion, Bolshevik, a little frigid for sure; the building of the Party. I think that our present war is about giving new content to this depopulated fiction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Pakistan's anti-drone politician and former cricket-star, Imran Khan, was taken off an international flight from Toronto to New York for questioning over his political views, and his critical stance on US foreign policy, immigration officials have confirmed.


"I was taken off from plane and interrogated by US Immigration in Canada on my views on drones. My stance is known. Drone attacks must stop," Khan tweeted yesterday after his questioning.



Imran Khan Detained on US Flight over Anti-Drone Activism


The US isn't even pretending to be winning "hearts and minds" anymore.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

US military facing fresh questions over targeting of children in Afghanistan

Quote:
The US military is facing fresh questions over its targeting policy in Afghanistan after a senior army officer suggested that troops were on the lookout for "children with potential hostile intent".

...The piece also quoted an unnamed marine corps official who questioned the "innocence" of Afghan children, particularly three who were killed in a US rocket strike in October. Last month, the New York Times quoted local officials who said Borjan, 12, Sardar Wali, 10, and Khan Bibi, eight, from Helmand's Nawa district had been killed while gathering dung for fuel.


I don't think anything tells the story better than this. Children bombed to atoms while out picking up shit for fuel...
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems as if an increasing percentile of returning soldiers exhibit PTSD. Could it be that no amount of training can brainwash people into accepting the wholesale slaughter of children and civilians?

Harper and his crowd seem ever ready to huff and puff and threaten to blow everyone's house down in their slavish following of the military interests of the Excited States.

For myself, I'd rather all our troops be brought home. Of course, this would make things dicey around the pipelines the US oil interests want to string across Afghanistan.

Just as the same mind-set would like to run pipelines across some of the most pristine wilderness in our country.

There is strong opposition to pipeline construction in B.C. I sure hope that doesn't mean we wind up with the US Marines tromping up and down our streets or drone fighters blowing up our schools and hospitals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Evil Twin
Stoned Immaculate


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3746
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

anne cameron wrote:

Harper and his crowd seem ever ready to huff and puff and threaten to blow everyone's house down in their slavish following of the military interests of the Excited States.

For myself, I'd rather all our troops be brought home. Of course, this would make things dicey around the pipelines the US oil interests want to string across Afghanistan.



Harper is smart enough to know it's all a sham. This isn't for nation building or humanitarian reasons or even to fight so-called "Islamic terrorism" (Harper surely knows that the so called "terrorists" were funded, trained and armed by two of the West's biggest Islamic allies: Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and once upon a time by the CIA as well). He is doing this to satisfy his ideological militarist and Islamophobic "base". Who cares how many civilians die or soldiers come back with PTSD if he wins elections and gets to look like a tough guy in the process?

Ditto for the "liberal" Obama. He too is smart enough to know it's all a big con. His problem is that he spent years slamming both Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush for supporting the Iraq invasion in 2003. Obama claimed that Iraq was a distraction from the really important "good" war, which was supposedly Afghanistan. Once he was in power, he surely knew it was a lost cause, but hey, he couldn't look like another "liberal wimp" so better to drag it for a few more bloody years so he can win re-election.

All this bloodshed so two intellectual but insecure men can posture as tough-guys.
_________________
I can't support bike lanes. Roads are built for buses, cars, and trucks. My heart bleeds when someone gets killed, but it's their own fault at the end of the day. - Assclown Rob Ford
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
An Afghan policewoman shot and killed an American adviser outside the police headquarters in Kabul on Monday, the latest in a rising tide of insider attacks by Afghans against their foreign allies, senior Afghan officials said.


Afghan policewoman kills American advisor


Another case of good guys with guns stopping bad guys with guns?

The comments section on this CBC article can be summed up with "Golly gosh, after all the swell things we do for these Stone Age people, they turn around and do something like this? EXTERMINATE THEM!!"
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For reasons I don't understand I read this and immediately flashed on how similar it is, in some vague psychological way to what happens when a teen-ager blows up and attacks a controlling parent... you just get sick and tired of the constant superiority, seniority, and bullying...

I can't say "good on her" but with what we've learned about the sexual impositions some of the male US military visit upon women, even other military women, I can kind'a sort'a understand some of what might have been going on in her head when she said Enough!

It's a shame, and if it is true it's all part of a long-range Taliban plot... well, all the more reason to get the hell out of there and start learning how to mind our own beeswax.

Bring'em all home!

And all the best of the season to all of you out there. I want you to know I am very grateful to have you in my life, even if it's long distance and thanks to the etheric.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the BBC:

Karzai orders US special forces out of Afghan province

Quote:
The Afghan president has ordered US special forces to leave Wardak province within two weeks.

The decision was being taken due to allegations of disappearances and torture by Afghans considered to be part of US special forces, said a spokesman for Hamid Karzai.

...The Afghan president's office said the decision to order the expulsion of US special forces had been taken at a meeting of the National Security Council.

"After a thorough discussion, it became clear that armed individuals named as US special force[s] stationed in Wardak province engage in harassing, annoying, torturing and even murdering innocent people," it said.

...The accountability of US forces and local militia working with them has been a growing source of friction in Afghan-US relations.

A week ago, Mr Karzai banned Afghan forces from calling in foreign air strikes on residential areas, following the deaths of 10 civilians in a night raid in eastern Kunar province.

Mr Karzai gave a blunt statement for the reasons for the ban.

"Our forces ask for air support from foreigners and children get killed in an air strike," he said.


I guess the question is, will Karzai's orders be obeyed by the USA? We'll see...
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Evil Twin
Stoned Immaculate


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3746
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maestro wrote:

I guess the question is, will Karzai's orders be obeyed by the USA? We'll see...


Two possibilities IMO:

1) These statements by Karzai - and there have been several by Karzai over the years condemning US/NATO behaviour, especially killing of civilians - are allowed by the US as a sort of "safety valve". IOW: They can piss on dead bodies, kill children, torture civilians etc. and then Karzai gets to act "outraged" for a few days and then it's business as usual.

OR

2) Since the latest statement by Karzai is much stronger than his past ones, maybe he finally realizes the US and NATO are leaving sooner than later. He has already signed major trade and aid agreements with India, Russia and Iran (all rivals of the creator of the Taliban, Pakistan) and might be on the verge of dumping the US for these countries (who let's face it, are geographically better able to protect him than the US). Ah those stupid-ass neo-cons: their invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan may end up resulting in increased Iranian influence in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Probably not the results Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith and the editors of Commentary wanted or expected when they pushed these wars. ROTFL
_________________
I can't support bike lanes. Roads are built for buses, cars, and trucks. My heart bleeds when someone gets killed, but it's their own fault at the end of the day. - Assclown Rob Ford
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone who claims to understand the swirling allegiances, alliances, and political tensions in Afghanistan is merely indulging in self deception.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> The Middle East and Central Asia All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Page 10 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
TATToday's Active Topics


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group