EnMasse Forum Index EnMasse
This place is all that is left.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   TATToday's Active Topics 
 ProfileProfile   Voting CentreVoting Centre   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
  Front PageFront Page Front Page SubmissionsFront Page Submissions LinksLinks Acceptable Use PolicyAcceptable Use Policy  DonateDonate 

 

 


Libyan Clearinghouse
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> The Middle East and Central Asia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Before the rebellion broke out in February, Libya exported 1.3 million barrels of oil a day. While that is less than 2 percent of world supplies, only a few other countries can supply equivalent grades of the sweet crude oil that many refineries around the world depend on. The resumption of Libyan production would help drive down oil prices in Europe, and indirectly, gasoline prices on the East Coast of the United States.

Western nations — especially the NATO countries that provided crucial air support to the rebels — want to make sure their companies are in prime position to pump the Libyan crude.

Foreign Minister Franco Frattini of Italy said on state television on Monday that the Italian oil company Eni “will have a No. 1 role in the future” in the North African country. Mr. Frattini even reported that Eni technicians were already on their way to eastern Libya to restart production.


Bastards.

The Scramble for Access to Libya’s Oil Wealth Begins
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, now it's time to lower those royalties and profit-sharings and what-not.

And if the people of Libya have to sacrifice some of their bloated healthcare and their free education, in order to ensure industry stability and continued investment (to create jobs 'natch), well, that's just a reality that we all have to accommodate.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eric Reguly, featured often (but not often enough) on the pages of the G&M Report On Business, is one of the most honest commentators found therein. In today's issue he comments on the situation in Libya:

They bombed and therefore they shall reap

Quote:
Six months ago, saving Libya from potential atrocities inspired by Moammar Gadhafi meant establishing a no-fly zone over the country, all the better to protect Benghazi, the rebel stronghold in the east. Then classic mission creep set in and the NATO forces, Canada among them, were bombing Tripoli and clearly trying to eliminate Africa’s longest-standing dictator and his sons (while denying that was the goal).

...By Wednesday it was amply clear that NATO’s mission creep was lubricated by oil.

...The ground war is almost over; the oil war has begun. Or maybe it began months ago.

...The oil industry’s biggest players, meanwhile, are salivating to reclaim their old concessions and nab new ones, all the more so since their own oil production has been in decline. The vast Ghadames and Sirte basins, largely off limits to foreign oil companies since Col. Gadhafi swept to power 42 years ago, are especially attractive.

...The rebels may savour their victory, but the revolution is not entirely theirs. Libya is looking suspiciously like an oil war and the countries that delivered the bombs want their rewards.


I strongly suggest a full reading of Reguly's comment. He is always direct and clear, keeping polemics to a minimum. A good source of information on various business issues.
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sparqui
Dog tired


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 5154
Location: Winnipeg

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for that, Maestro.
_________________
“If my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a tractor.”

-- Gilles Duceppe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
By Wednesday it was amply clear that NATO’s mission creep was lubricated by oil.


No shirt, Sherlock. NATO's motives were amply clear by May.

Has anyone noticed what's happening in Syria these days? A decades-long dictatorship is using armour and heavy weapons against its citizens.

Yawn, there's no oil there. Besides, who knows when we might have to borrow some Syrian "interrogators" again?
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

al-Qa'bong wrote:
...Yawn, there's no oil there. Besides, who knows when we might have to borrow some Syrian "interrogators" again?


The mainstream (for profit) media seems to have forgotten this. I can understand it in the USA, where the CIA connection to Syria has gone down the memory hole, but to forget here in Canada is inexcusable. Anyone remember Maher Arar? Apparently no one in the media does...
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sparqui
Dog tired


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 5154
Location: Winnipeg

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So you think Syria is safe from NATO's cross hairs? I certainly think Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are but I wouldn't put Syria on the same list.

I may be a cynic but I bet anyone Israel has a problem with is a safe bet for regime change.
_________________
“If my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a tractor.”

-- Gilles Duceppe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It is worth reminding everyone something never mentioned, that UNSCR 1973 which established the no fly zone and mandate to protect civilians had

“the aim of facilitating dialogue to lead to the political reforms necessary to find a peaceful and sustainable solution;”

That is in Operative Para 2 of the Resolution

Plainly the people of Sirte hold a different view to the “rebels” as to who should run the country. NATO have in effect declared being in Gadaffi’s political camp a capital offence. There is no way the massive assault on Sirte is “facilitating dialogue”. it is rather killing those who do not hold the NATO approved opinion. That is the actual truth. It is extremely plain.

I have no time for Gadaffi. I have actually met him, and he really is nuts, and dangerous. There were aspects of his rule in terms of social development which were good, but much more that was bad and tyrannical. But if NATO is attacking him because he is a dictator, why is it not attacking Dubai, Bahrain, Syria, Burma, Zimbabwe, or Uzbekistan, to name a random selection of badly governed countries?

“Liberal intervention” does not exist. What we have is the opposite; highly selective neo-imperial wars aimed at ensuring politically client control of key physical resources.

Wars kill people. Women and children are dying now in Libya, whatever the sanitised media tells you. The BBC have reported it will take a decade to repair Libya’s infrastructure from the damage of war. That in an underestimate. Iraq is still decades away from returning its utilities to their condition in 2000.

I strongly support the revolutions of the Arab Spring. But NATO intervention does not bring freedom, it brings destruction, degradation and permanent enslavement to the neo-colonial yoke. From now on, Libyans like us will be toiling to enrich western bankers. That, apparently, is worth to NATO the reduction of Sirte to rubble.


Sirte – the Apotheosis of “Liberal Intervention”
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bshmr
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 4004
Location: Central USA, Earth

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There seems to be more than western propaganda going on, perhaps merely not repeating the USAn stupidities in Iraq and Afghanistan.

AU desists from recognising Libya's NTC
Date:Today 09:48
Quote:
African body calls for formation of transitional government that also includes officials from Gaddafi's side
.
http://english.aljazeera.net//news/africa/2011/08/20118261427105797...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More evidence is emerging that Gaddafi's forces were storing weapons and ammunition in civilian buildings. The following video (sorry for the Facebook link) shows a major ammo and weapons dump in the Tajoura neighbourhood of Tripoli being cleared out by revolutionaries. As the video shows, this dump was under a civilian apartment building.

https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=148213828600134
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
More evidence is emerging that Gaddafi's forces were storing weapons and ammunition in civilian buildings.


That makes tactical sense, considering NATO is bombing any known military buildings. cf. Stalingrad.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

al-Qa'bong wrote:
Quote:
More evidence is emerging that Gaddafi's forces were storing weapons and ammunition in civilian buildings.


That makes tactical sense, considering NATO is bombing any known military buildings. cf. Stalingrad.

I'm not saying it doesn't make tactical sense, but rather that it is an illustration that there is wrong on both sides.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's wrong on both sides, but thanks to harper, we're one of the bad sides.

And, for my money, Qaddafi was an Arab nationalist. Whatever his sins (which were many) I don't think he ever reached the depths of arrogant contempt that the puppet-masters of these rebels are going to display.

I still believe that they're going to put that country through the wringer and their puppets will start off thinking they can call a halt to imperialist depredations, but they'll find that the selling-off of resources and the slashing of government revenues and spending has made them entirely dependent on imperialists' military aid and torture apparatus.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

An important test will be whether the NTC can resist a foreign "police" force, which is already being bandied about. It is quite clear that the Libyan people of whatever political stripe don't want a foreign occupation force under whatever name. If the NTC can successfully resist the desire of western powers to send one, that will be an important indicator of the rise of a truly independent democratic government. Conversely, if the NTC can't resist it, that will be an important indicator that what we have is a puppet regime.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently, the rebels refuse to extradite the Lockerbie bomber.

I don't have any quarrel with that, particularly since the guy has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel.

But seriously, what kind of puppets are these that won't do as their masters tell them?? Are they NATO stooges, or aren't they??
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This example could be proof of their stoogeness, in that, since this guy is almost dead anyway, turning him over isn't going to accomplish much.

On the other hand, their not turning in this meaningless near-corpse makes the "rebels" look as if they're strutting their independence, giving them legitimacy in both the eyes of Libyans and the international community.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
A_J
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 362

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senor Magoo wrote:
But seriously, what kind of puppets are these that won't do as their masters tell them?? Are they NATO stooges, or aren't they??

I'm sure there are a few who will be quick to claim that those who agree to extradite are stooges and those who refuse to extradite are merely well disciplined stooges Wink

I believe even now the dominant narrative among some is that both the rebels and Gaddafi are U.S. stooges Shrug
_________________
John Stuart Mill in On Liberty wrote:
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what I've been reading on Al Jazeera and on twitter, Tripoli seems to be getting back to something approaching pre-war normalcy pretty quickly, with lots of people out and about preparing for Eid. Particularly, it seems that as of today traffic police were back on the streets of Tripoli for the first time since the opposition forces entered the city.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's good evidence that Libya had nothing to do with the Lockerbie bombing.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DSquared
aka Aristotleded24


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 5570
Location: Winnipeg

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So help me, I agree with Margaret Wente:

Quote:
Another possibility is that the rebel fighters, who have been described by The Globe and Mail’s Graeme Smith as a ragtag bunch of undisciplined, untrained young men, will take their blood revenge on the streets of Tripoli. You’d have to be deluded to believe their leaders are ready for prime time (even though our novice foreign minister, John Baird, is gushingly impressed with them). Just last month, NTC members murdered one of their own military leaders, although who did it, or why, nobody knows. What happens if the rebel factions turn on each other? Will NATO switch sides to protect the people it has armed the rebels to attack? Will the UN send in peacekeepers? Will Canada be asked to replace its aircraft pilots with boots on the ground?

If you get the feeling the Western allies haven’t thought this through, you’re right. They appear to be making it up as they go along. As for Canada’s involvement, the only rationale is that NATO called, so we answered. Our media (which always need good guys and bad guys, for storytelling reasons) are generally depicting the fall of Tripoli as a triumph for the good guys. But it may really be a triumph for the forces of chaos and anarchy.

_________________
This is pre-eminently the time, to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself-Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

She's not even a broken clock that's right twice a day. She's the product of one of the universe's infinite monkeys banging away at one of the universe's infinite number of typewriters.

Don't trouble yourself with the mirage that she's come up with an actual thought that you agree with.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Characteristic sloppy logic on Wente's part, and defied by at least some of the realities on the ground. Clearly the opposition forces were co-ordinated enough to manage to push Gaddafi forces out of Misrata and the Nafousa Mountains, and then use those areas as staging grounds for the western campaigns which ultimately toppled Gaddafi's government. The idea that the opposition forces were badly coordinated and undisciplined really applied only to the army in the east. It is reasonable enough that the eastern army became the face of the opposition forces because it was much easier and safer for the media to get into the east to cover events than it was for reporters to get into the Nafousa mountains or into Misrata. That doesn't mean, however, that the media were not guilty of tunnel vision.

In a shameless display of double think, Wente wrote: "Just last month, NTC members murdered one of their own military leaders, although who did it, or why, nobody knows." So if nobody knows who did it, how can Wente claim it was NTC members? Wente has decided it was NTC members no matter than "nobody knows" who did it.

That piece was published six days ago. Goodness knows how long ago Wente actually wrote it. For all we know, it was written before the uprising and opposition advance into Tripoli. Her prognostications (and apparently gleeful anticipation) of a blood bath in Tripoli have been largely proven wrong. As I noted, Al Jazeera has been reporting that the situation in Tripoli is largely returning to a form of normality, not devolving into "chaos and anarchy".

It is also unclear exactly how much influence tribes actually have in Libyan politics. A dictator like Gaddafi, who had been in power so long, will have worked away on destroying all systems of loyalty that did not relate to him at the centre. It is possible that tribal identity will act as a destabilizing influence, but it is also entirely possible that the influence of the tribes has been vastly overstated.

Wente should stick to subjects she knows something about, like whining about "welfare queens" and "champagne socialists".
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
In a shameless display of double think, Wente wrote: "Just last month, NTC members murdered one of their own military leaders, although who did it, or why, nobody knows." So if nobody knows who did it, how can Wente claim it was NTC members? Wente has decided it was NTC members no matter than "nobody knows" who did it.


Pardon me, there's no doubt the killing was carried out by some member of the NTC. The only question is who exactly that was. The only thing that binds the NTC is there mission to unseat Gaddafi. After that comes the free-fo-all.

Bear in mind also, that while the rebels themselves may be rag-tag, the bombers that are providing them air support are not. Nor are the special forces that are workinig with them on the ground.
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maestro wrote:
TS. wrote:
In a shameless display of double think, Wente wrote: "Just last month, NTC members murdered one of their own military leaders, although who did it, or why, nobody knows." So if nobody knows who did it, how can Wente claim it was NTC members? Wente has decided it was NTC members no matter than "nobody knows" who did it.


Pardon me, there's no doubt the killing was carried out by some member of the NTC.

Oh really? No doubt at all? Glad to know that you were part of the exhaustive investigation that determined who was responsible.

Maestro wrote:
The only thing that binds the NTC is there mission to unseat Gaddafi. After that comes the free-fo-all.

I don't know why you keep insisting that it is a bad thing that the NTC and the opposition are a pluralistic group rather than a single homogeneous group. I would be more worried then, because it would be more likely to turn into a new tyranny, just of a different group. Pluralism is good, and should be encouraged after such a long period of autocracy, not castigated.

Maestro wrote:
Bear in mind also, that while the rebels themselves may be rag-tag, the bombers that are providing them air support are not. Nor are the special forces that are workinig with them on the ground.

As I said, that definitely applies to eastern Libya and the army that worked out of there. I mean for most of the war, they couldn't advance past Brega. But manifestly, that does not apply to the western parts of Libya. The opposition forces in Misrata were able to get themselves together and push a much better armed force out street by street, and air power doesn't do much good there. The only contribution that NATO made to the fight to free Misrata was to bomb the long range artillery pieces that Gaddafi's forces were using. The evidence suggests that the western Libyan opposition forces were much better organized than the eastern forces. There also isn't much evidence to suggest that the special forces were actually fighting on the front line, but rather were helping the opposition with training and organization.

What rag-tagness (if I can use that word) there is, is pretty reasonable to expect when a civilian population rises up. The opposition forces built themselves up from scratch, which is a pretty impressive organizational achievement, to go from nothing to an army capable of taking on a large part of the burden of the war within six months.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
Oh really? No doubt at all? Glad to know that you were part of the exhaustive investigation that determined who was responsible.


The NTC themselves had a couple of different stories, but neither denied that Younis had been killed by some section of the NTC. If you want to believe the NTC is something other than the Iraqi National Congress was, go ahead, but the fact is, Younis was killed by people in the side he was on.

TS. wrote:
I don't know why you keep insisting that it is a bad thing that the NTC and the opposition are a pluralistic group rather than a single homogeneous group.


Top the extent pluralistic means united in a fight against Gaddafi, they are pluralistic. After he's gone the real struggle for power will begin. To paraphrase an old warmonger, this isn't the end, this isn't the beginning of the end, this is the end of the beginning. As we've seen in Iraq, the opposition to the NTC will disappear for a while, only to re-appear. At the same time, all those NTC players who have something at stake will start jockeying for position.

NATO will get what it wants, that is, a greatly weakened state government which depends upon NATO for support.

The only thing that will ameliorate the situation is that Libya is a large country with a small population. Should give the different factions room to stay out of each others way. The contention will be, of course, who gets the benefits of the oil revenue.
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Top Ten Myths About War Against Libya:

Quote:
NATO has provided a shield for the insurgents in Libya to victimize unarmed civilians in areas they came to occupy. There was no hint of any “responsibility to protect” in these cases. NATO assisted the rebels in starving Tripoli of supplies, subjecting its civilian population to a siege that deprived them of water, food, medicine, and fuel. When Gaddafi was accused of doing this to Misrata, the international media were quick to cite this as a war crime. Save Misrata, kill Tripoli—whatever you want to label such “logic,” humanitarian is not an acceptable option. Leaving aside the documented crimes by the insurgents against black Libyans and African migrant workers, the insurgents were also found by Human Rights Watch to have engaged in “looting, arson, and abuse of civilians in [four] recently captured towns in western Libya”. In Benghazi, which the insurgents have held for months now, revenge killings have been reported by The New York Times as late as this May, and by Amnesty International in late June and faulted the insurgents’ National Transitional Council. The responsibility to protect? It now sounds like something deserving wild mockery.

_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Considering that if you follow the links in that piece, the author's own claims are wildly inflated, it does his own credibility damage. The piece has something of a "pot calling the kettle black" quality to it.

One example, there is a link in the piece "the first reports", claiming that the NTC's forces have "slaughtered people in Tripoli." If you actually follow the link, it is a BBC summary of the situation and talks about supply shortages in Tripoli, nothing to do with the NTC's forces "slaughtering" anyone.

Counterpunch has done itself no favours in its coverage of Libya. It has, itself, perpetrated the exact same failings as the mainstream western media - repeating claims from one side as if they were gospel. They should look to the log in their own eye.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I followed one link, to a story about the killing of black Libyans that checked out.

I was out in public and CNN was covering the rebel takeover of Qaddafi's intelligence building and the whole thing was sickening. All this time spent about uncovering the truth of the Qaddafi regime when the US-Americans will hide, obstruct, lie, to protect their own dictators.

Qaddafi was a bad guy but he was toppled by imperialists. The whole thing stinks to high-heaven and it will to Canada's shame that we participated in this travesty.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The overworked propaganda machines are going to throw a belt soon, although the "blah, blah,blah, Khaddafi is the evillist person on Earth since Saddam and Adolf" campaign is working.

Quote:
The starting pistol has been fired on bids by Britain and other western powers to secure a slice of the oil prize in Libya when France said it was "fair and logical" for its companies to benefit.

Alain Juppé, the French foreign minister, planted his flag in the sand as the Guardian was told that BP was already holding private talks with members of Libya's interim government.

Libya is a vital energy producer, and BP had previously committed itself to spending more than $1bn on exploration plans under Muammar Gaddafi's government.

Shell was also becoming active before the civil war broke out, as was Total of France, but the conflict over the past few months has brought the country's existing oil production of 1.6m barrels a day – 2% of the world's total – to a halt.

Rebel leaders had already made clear that countries active in supporting their insurrection – notably Britain and France – should expect to be treated favourably once the dust of war had settled.


The race is on for Libya's oil, with Britain and France both staking a claim
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
voice of the damned
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 6148
Location: slandered, libeled

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I followed one link, to a story about the killing of black Libyans that checked out.


Not sure if this is the same story, but it talks about blacks being "rounded up". I believe it's originally from AP, with editorial comment from the Root.

link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17646
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, my, this does wonders to enhance the credibility of the USA and NATO's mission/attack/war/action/thingummy in Libya. Looks like Libya was a handy "rendition" site for the CIA.

Hands up people who are shocked? Hands up people who don't see a tinge of hypocrisy in the rhetoric we've been listening to for the past 20 years?

Quote:
The CIA worked closely with Moammar Gadhafi's intelligence services in the rendition of terror suspects to Libya for interrogation, according to documents seen Saturday by the AP, co-operation that could spark tensions between Washington and Libya's new rulers.

The CIA was among a number of foreign intelligence services that worked with Libya's agencies, according to documents found at a Libyan security agency building in Tripoli.

... The intelligence documents found in Tripoli, meanwhile, provided new details on the ties between Western countries and Col. Gadhafi's regime. Many of those same countries backed the NATO attacks that helped Libya's rebels force Col. Gadhafi from power.

One notable case is that of Abdel-Hakim Belhaj, commander of the anti-Gadhafi rebel force that now controls Tripoli. Mr. Belhaj is the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a now-dissolved militant group with links to al-Qaeda. Mr. Belhaj says he was tortured by CIA agents at a secret prison, then returned to Libya.

Two documents from March 2004 appear to be American correspondence to Libyan officials to arrange Mr. Belhaj's rendition.

Referring to him by his nom de guerre, Abdullah al-Sadiq, the documents say he will be flown from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Libya and asks for Libyan government agents to accompany him.

It also requests American “access to al-Sadiq for debriefing purposes once he is in your custody.”

“Please be advised that we must be assured that al-Sadiq will be treated humanely and that his human rights will be respected,” the document says.

... In Washington, CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood declined to comment Saturday on any specific allegation related to the documents.

“It can't come as a surprise that the Central Intelligence Agency works with foreign governments to help protect our country from terrorism and other deadly threats,” Ms. Youngblood said. “That is exactly what we are expected to do.”


Globe and Mail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Further to that from the New York Times via Reuters:

Documents show links between CIA, Libya spy unit

Quote:
Documents found in Tripoli detail close ties between the CIA and Libya's intelligence service and suggest the United States sent terrorism suspects for questioning in Libya despite that country's reputation for torture, the New York Times reported on Saturday.

...One document appears to be a proposed speech written by the Americans for Gaddafi about renouncing unconventional weapons. Other files show that MI-6 was willing to trace telephone numbers for the Libyans.

A series of communications about renditions is dated after Libya's 2004 renouncement of its weapons program. The files mention having a friendly country arrest a terrorism suspect, and then suggest aircraft would be sent to retrieve the suspect and bring him to Libya for questioning, the Times reported.

One document detailed a list of 89 questions for the Libyans to ask a terrorism suspect, the Times said.

...CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood is quoted by the Times as declining to comment specifically on the documents but saying, "It can't come as a surprise that the Central Intelligence Agency works with foreign governments to help protect our country from terrorism and other deadly threats."


Well, she's right about that. I ain't surprised. Others may be.
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It doesn't do much for the credibility of the USA or, for that matter, the Gaddafi regime given that both sides claimed to be all sweetness and light, and both of which deny any involvement with torture.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The US doesn't deny using torture, they just give it a cute euphemism: "enhanced interrogation."
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slumberjack
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 923
Location: squelch~~big waves and high smiles from the stomach and intestine of capital.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maestro wrote:
Documents show links between CIA, Libya spy unit


Quote:
Documents found in Tripoli detail close ties between the CIA and Libya's intelligence service and suggest the United States sent terrorism suspects for questioning in Libya despite that country's reputation for torture, the New York Times reported on Saturday.


If I was Syria I'd have felt a little jilted over this arrangement. What about those meaningful nights of torture we did together?
_________________
There is this old notion, Bolshevik, a little frigid for sure; the building of the Party. I think that our present war is about giving new content to this depopulated fiction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

USA to Syria: "Don't get me wrong baby. You're brutal and all. But Libya's got that OIL!"
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

William Blum's take on it all:

Quote:
But there are several reasons to question this analysis in favor of seeing the Libyan rebels’ uprising as a planned and violent attempt to take power in behalf of their own political movement, however heterogeneous that movement might appear to be in its early stage. For example:

They soon began flying the flag of the monarchy that Gaddafi had overthrown
They were an armed and violent rebellion almost from the beginning; within a few days, we could read of “citizens armed with weapons seized from army bases” and of “the policemen who had participated in the clash were caught and hanged by protesters”
Their revolt took place not in the capital but in the heart of the country’s oil region; they then began oil production and declared that foreign countries would be rewarded oil-wise in relation to how much each country aided their cause
They soon set up a Central Bank, a rather bizarre thing for a protest movement
International support came quickly, even beforehand, from Qatar and al Jazeera to the CIA and French intelligence

The notion that a leader does not have the right to put down an armed rebellion against the state is too absurd to discuss.

Not very long ago, Iraq and Libya were the two most modern and secular states in the Mideast/North Africa world with perhaps the highest standards of living in the region. Then the United States of America came along and saw fit to make a basket case of each one. The desire to get rid of Gaddafi had been building for years; the Libyan leader had never been a reliable pawn; then the Arab Spring provided the excellent opportunity and cover.

_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I take issue (unsurprisingly) with at least some of Blum's points that you quoted, thwap.

1. The flag: It was a convenient symbol for people to rally around since it had applied to all of Libya. The process involved in producing an equally recognizable banner that would be largely acceptable across the country would have taken a very long time. Just think how divisive the process was in the 1960s when Canada was coming up with a flag, or the rancour that went on when Iraq was choosing a post-invasion flag. The green flag was clearly associated with the regime (as was the colour green generally - see for example Gaddafi's green book).

2. Armed uprising almost from the beginning: the people being attacked decided they didn't want to just lie down and die, so they stole arms from the forces attacking them. Is Blum suggesting that because they didn't adopt Gandhian non-violence, that is an indication of a planned uprising?

3. "Oil region": It is hardly surprising that the revolt started in Benghazi, since the east had been politically excluded from the Gaddafi regime. Some things are just coincidence. And the NTC needed money to fight the civil war and to fund their attempt to maintain a structure of government in eastern Libya. What other source of income did they have but Libya's oil? And also, it isn't that they started production, the oil was already flowing under Gaddafi. They continued production until Gaddafi's forces sabotaged the drilling equipment to try to defund the NTC.

4. Central bank: Yes, this is admittedly somewhat odd, but as with the oil, the NTC was trying to set up an alternative government, it was by that point no longer a protest movement.

5. International support: I read over the article and can't see what "beforehand" support Blum is talking about. The rest of the argument seems to boil down to "Al Jazeera overblew stories and the western world reacted quickly."
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bshmr
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 4004
Location: Central USA, Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not an ideal source though a handy one of several. IIRC, the ATimes blistered the whole adventure as Sarkozy's wounded pride enable or something like that. This article isn't as critical.

Libya Could Be the Last Place Where the West is Allowed
to Intervene

"Every major rising power opposed the
exhortations of London and Paris to go to war"

By Shashank Joshi
The Telegraph (UK)
September 3, 2011

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/liby...
Quote:
Nato's job in Libya is all but done. As the conquering heroes met in Paris yesterday, there was no "Mission Accomplished" banner in sight. In place of triumphalism, we've substituted lessons galore - about how durable Nato remains, and its discovery of a new model of apparently riskless war.

...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
2. Armed uprising almost from the beginning: the people being attacked decided they didn't want to just lie down and die, so they stole arms from the forces attacking them. Is Blum suggesting that because they didn't adopt Gandhian non-violence, that is an indication of a planned uprising?


That's one interpretation. The other is that the arms were supplied from the beginning by the UK and USA. After all, they have had troops on the ground from the get-go (ok, we'll call them 'special forces').

But even the widest-eyed innocent can't ignore the fact that the USA and UK (and possibly others) were using Libyan intelligence as proxy torturers, and that their main man was allowed to 'escape' to London where he remains under cover.

If Gaddafi is brought before the ICC should not Bush and Blair, as accomplices, also be brought to justice? And where does this leave Harper's sanctimonious speech to the 'troops'?
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive


Last edited by Maestro on Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:54 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
I take issue (unsurprisingly) with at least some of Blum's points that you quoted, thwap.

1. The flag: It was a convenient symbol for people to rally around since it had applied to all of Libya.


So, obviously, you return to a symbol of an order that was detested by most Libyans.

TS. wrote:
2. Armed uprising almost from the beginning:


Yes, and they just spontaneously had enough weapons to fight back and this people's organization had selected leaders who just happened to be Western puppets who just happened to just happen to just happen to ... what nonsense.

TS. wrote:
3. "Oil region": It is hardly surprising that the revolt started in Benghazi, since the east had been politically excluded from the Gaddafi regime. Some things are just coincidence.


No. When Western imperialists back a group of stooges in an oil-rich country it is most definitely NOT a coincidence. Give your head a shake.

TS. wrote:
4. Central bank: Yes, this is admittedly somewhat odd, but as with the oil, the NTC was trying to set up an alternative government,
it was by that point no longer a protest movement.


And Libya was structurally independent of international banksters and the puppets' first move was to end this. Yes. Another "coincidence."

TS. wrote:
5. International support: I read over the article and can't see what "beforehand" support Blum is talking about. The rest of the argument seems to boil down to "Al Jazeera overblew stories and the western world reacted quickly."


And we see the very real world results of the very things that you mention. I would advise that you read the article a second time.

This shit isn't that hard to figure out.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris Hedges ...

Quote:
The NATO airstrikes on the city of Sirte expose the hypocrisy of our “humanitarian” intervention in Libya. Sirte is the last Gadhafi stronghold and the home to Gadhafi’s tribe. The armed Libyan factions within the rebel alliance are waiting like panting hound dogs outside the city limits. They are determined, once the airstrikes are over, not only to rid the world of Gadhafi but all those within his tribe who benefited from his 42-year rule. The besieging of Sirte by NATO warplanes, which are dropping huge iron fragmentation bombs that will kill scores if not hundreds of innocents, mocks the justification for intervention laid out in a United Nations Security Council resolution. The U.N., when this began six months ago, authorized “all necessary measures … to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack.” We have, as always happens in war, become the monster we sought to defeat. We destroy in order to save. Libya’s ruling National Transitional Council estimates that the number of Libyans killed in the last six months, including civilians and combatants, has exceeded 50,000. Our intervention, as in Iraq and Afghanistan, has probably claimed more victims than those killed by the former regime. But this intervention, like the others, was never, despite all the high-blown rhetoric surrounding it, about protecting or saving Libyan lives. It was about the domination of oil fields by Western corporations.

_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maestro wrote:
TS. wrote:
2. Armed uprising almost from the beginning: the people being attacked decided they didn't want to just lie down and die, so they stole arms from the forces attacking them. Is Blum suggesting that because they didn't adopt Gandhian non-violence, that is an indication of a planned uprising?


That's one interpretation. The other is that the arms were supplied from the beginning by the UK and USA. After all, they have had troops on the ground from the get-go (ok, we'll call them 'special forces').

But even the widest-eyed innocent can't ignore the fact that the USA and UK (and possibly others) were using Libyan intelligence as proxy torturers, and that their main man was allowed to 'escape' to London where he remains under cover.

If Gaddafi is brought before the ICC should not Bush and Blair, as accomplices, also be brought to justice? And where does this leave Harper's sanctimonious speech to the 'troops'?

I would absolutely support Bush and Blair being brought before the ICC. Are you taking the position that if they are not also brought before the ICC, Gaddafi should be allowed to skip out too? There is no reasonable case to be made that Gaddafi was not a brutally repressive dictator. And yes, I think that the leadership of Yemen, Bahrain and Syria should also be hauled up on charges. The ICC is clearly imperfect. That the Security Council controls who gets brought up on charges is not a tenable system in the long term, as it essentially gives a get-out-of-jail-free card to the leadership of the permanent members and their allies. Improvements definitely need to be made. But it is far better than a system of absolute international impunity.

thwap wrote:
TS. wrote:
I take issue (unsurprisingly) with at least some of Blum's points that you quoted, thwap.

1. The flag: It was a convenient symbol for people to rally around since it had applied to all of Libya.


So, obviously, you return to a symbol of an order that was detested by most Libyans.

If the Libyan people decide they want to do that, that is their business. Presumably, there is going to be a constitutional convention or constituent assembly as some point to draw up a new constitution. If the flag is still considered to be a symbol of the monarchy that was overthrown, then perhaps the constitution-drafting body will see fit to change it. It's up to them.

thwap wrote:
TS. wrote:
2. Armed uprising almost from the beginning:


Yes, and they just spontaneously had enough weapons to fight back and this people's organization had selected leaders who just happened to be Western puppets who just happened to just happen to just happen to ... what nonsense.

So what, the entire opposition to Gaddafi is composed of CIA plants? Every single person out protesting on the street in mid-February, fighting from February to August and now celebrating in various cities around Libya? You seem to have bought into the nonsense that Gaddafi was a widely beloved leader, rather than someone who enforced loyalty to the regime by force.

thwap wrote:
TS. wrote:
3. "Oil region": It is hardly surprising that the revolt started in Benghazi, since the east had been politically excluded from the Gaddafi regime. Some things are just coincidence.


No. When Western imperialists back a group of stooges in an oil-rich country it is most definitely NOT a coincidence. Give your head a shake.

Yes, clearly ipso facto. Nothing happens in the world that the imperial powers don't control.

thwap wrote:
TS. wrote:
4. Central bank: Yes, this is admittedly somewhat odd, but as with the oil, the NTC was trying to set up an alternative government,
it was by that point no longer a protest movement.


And Libya was structurally independent of international banksters and the puppets' first move was to end this. Yes. Another "coincidence."

How else was the NTC to fund its operations? The available sources of money were the western world and oil, and presumably the west used the opportunity to say to the NTC, you want our money, you do things our way, and thus the Central Bank. I have never claimed that NATO got involved for any kind of altruistic reasons.

thwap wrote:
TS. wrote:
5. International support: I read over the article and can't see what "beforehand" support Blum is talking about. The rest of the argument seems to boil down to "Al Jazeera overblew stories and the western world reacted quickly."


And we see the very real world results of the very things that you mention. I would advise that you read the article a second time.

This shit isn't that hard to figure out.

And clearly if I don't share your view, I just can't figure it out. Could you try to be a little less condescending?
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thwap
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4564
Location: Hamilton

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS,

Your deliberate inability to grasp William Blum's criticism of Al Jazeera set me off I'll admit.

First of all, Blum is a renowned expert in the USA's imperialist interventions.

Second of all, I would bet on the persistence of criminal US imperialism over the idea of the unblemished integrity of Al Jazeera.

But this is starting to descend into the realm of farce.

The rebels were armed and fighting from the very beginning. That doesn't just happen. Are you going to suggest that the reason the Syrian rebels haven't started a major military action against their dictatorship is because they're not as angry yet as the Libyan rebels were?

If the people of Libya wanted to rise up against a dictator, they would have my blessing. If they did it on their own, then whatever happened would be their affair.

By meddling in their affairs, and meddling for reasons of imperialist self-interest, we, as Canadians are IMPLICATED in the future crimes of our stooges.
_________________
Man! I hate them fancy-lads!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bshmr
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 4004
Location: Central USA, Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's more fuel. Note, some point at France as primary with what seems 'better' reason.

Quote:
THE ROVING EYE
It's a Total war, monsieur: Call it the Friends of Libya war; the R2P war (as in "responsibility to protect" Western plunder); the Air France war; the Total war; anyway, the "friends" had a blast spinning their win in Libya, which magically is not in Africa anymore. It has been relocated (upgraded?) to Arabia. - Pepe Escobar (Sep 2, '11) < http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MI03Ak01.html >

US debates 'leading from behind': President Barack Obama's strategy of "leading from behind" - quietly galvanizing action by others to gain the desired result without the United States itself being seen to lead the charge - seems to have paid off in Libya. While this angers hardball neo-conservatives, a new model for military intervention and "regime change" might be in the making.
- Jim Lobe (Sep 2, '11) < http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MI03Ak02.html >
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maestro
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 2359
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
But it is far better than a system of absolute international impunity.


If the only criminals to be brought before the ICC are enemies of the USA, UK, etc. it is a system of international impunity.

In any case, now that it has been shown those countries opposed to Gaddafi were using his regime for their own purposes (rendition and torture), and that the person most responsible for those acts is safely ensconced in London, only the terminally naive can still believe the Libyan action has anything at all to do with bringing a bad man to justice.

It is nothing more or less than capital imposing it's will on the rest of the world. The charade of 'protecting civilians' has been completely exposed, as have the extensive connections between USA/UK and Libyan intelligence.

This whole operation has the stink of Andrew Marshall about it, an opportunistic grab of increasingly rare sweet crude under cover of a flimsy 'humanitarian' mission.
_________________
On the wilds of the Drive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If the only criminals to be brought before the ICC are enemies of the USA, UK, etc. it is a system of international impunity.


No kidding. Nothing's changed since Hermie Goering accused his own accusers at Nuremberg of meting out "victor's justice."

There is no rule of law in international relations; the law is merely whatever the powerful allow themselves to do. This much has also not changed since before the days of the siege of Jericho.
_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maestro wrote:
TS. wrote:
But it is far better than a system of absolute international impunity.


If the only criminals to be brought before the ICC are enemies of the USA, UK, etc. it is a system of international impunity.

I'm not denying that it is a system of partial impunity, and is slanted against enemies of the USA and UK. But Russia and China have also used their UNSC vetos to shield allies from ICC prosecution. What went before was a system of absolute impunity. What there is now is a system of partial impunity that desperately needs a revamp to give the ICC independence from the UNSC.

Maestro wrote:
In any case, now that it has been shown those countries opposed to Gaddafi were using his regime for their own purposes (rendition and torture), and that the person most responsible for those acts is safely ensconced in London, only the terminally naive can still believe the Libyan action has anything at all to do with bringing a bad man to justice.

It is nothing more or less than capital imposing it's will on the rest of the world. The charade of 'protecting civilians' has been completely exposed, as have the extensive connections between USA/UK and Libyan intelligence.

This whole operation has the stink of Andrew Marshall about it, an opportunistic grab of increasingly rare sweet crude under cover of a flimsy 'humanitarian' mission.

Let me be as clear as I can, and as I have been throughout. I do not believe that NATO acted for altruistic motives. I believe that their self-interested motives have, for once, produced a good result in the overthrow of a dictator.

thwap wrote:
TS,

Your deliberate inability to grasp William Blum's criticism of Al Jazeera set me off I'll admit.

First of all, Blum is a renowned expert in the USA's imperialist interventions.

Second of all, I would bet on the persistence of criminal US imperialism over the idea of the unblemished integrity of Al Jazeera.

But this is starting to descend into the realm of farce.

The rebels were armed and fighting from the very beginning. That doesn't just happen. Are you going to suggest that the reason the Syrian rebels haven't started a major military action against their dictatorship is because they're not as angry yet as the Libyan rebels were?

If the people of Libya wanted to rise up against a dictator, they would have my blessing. If they did it on their own, then whatever happened would be their affair.

By meddling in their affairs, and meddling for reasons of imperialist self-interest, we, as Canadians are IMPLICATED in the future crimes of our stooges.

The arms that the Libyan opposition had in Benghazi in the early stages of the uprising came from two important sources: defecting army and paramilitary police units who refused orders to fire on protesters (unless you deny that there were actual protesters and that the crowds were all CIA agents) and from the Katiba compound, the main army base in Benghazi, which was breached by protesters with a commandeered bulldozer on February 19, and finally seized on February 21. The opposition was not, in fact, armed from the very beginning. The first protest was approximately 200 people in front of the Benghazi courthouse on February 15, a protest which was forcibly broken up by police. There were also protests in Al Bayda and Az Zintan, where protesters set fire to police stations. On the 16th, there were protests in Benghazi, Al Bayda, Darna, Al Quba and Az Zintan, with 1,500 people storming the internal security compound in Al Bayda. On February 17, there was a major protest in Benghazi that was met with force. It was on the 17th that the first police units began to defect, refusing orders to fire. Large protests in Benghazi continued on the 18th, with regime forces being overwhelmed by the numbers of the protesters, and with further regime units defecting and refusing orders to fire. The 19th saw the breaching of the compound, which gave the opposition a major source of weapons. The Syrian people have not had an event similar to the breaching of the Katiba compound, but the leaders of the Syrian protests also seem to have made a decision to pursue a more Gandhian program of resistance, rather than a violent path of resistance.

The continued existence of US imperialism, which I don't deny, doesn't mean that everything that happened in Libya happened as a result of US imperialism. You're indulging in the fallacy of the undistributed middle.

And thanks for suggesting that I am arguing in bad faith. It is possible to have a disagreement without thinking that the other person is being disingenuous, either deliberately or otherwise. I'd appreciate it if you could bear that in mind.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al-Qa'bong
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6048
Location: A monistic vulgarity in which nobility and wisdom have been exchanged for a pale belief in progress

PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I believe that their self-interested motives have, for once, produced a good result in the overthrow of a dictator


Thousands of dead Libyans probably agree with you, as would hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis.

Hoo ra.

Quote:
Today the United States is morally bankrupt and spiritually broken. The problem is not that we have strayed from our founding principles, but that we are still operating on those principles — delusional notions about manifest destiny, American exceptionalism, the right to take more than our share of the world’s resources by whatever means necessary. As the United States grew in wealth and power, bounty for the chosen came at the cost of misery for the many.

After World War II, as the United States became the dominant power not just in the Americas but on the world stage, the principles didn’t change. U.S. foreign policy sought to deepen and extend U.S. power around the world, especially in the energy-rich and strategically crucial Middle East; always with an eye on derailing any Third World societies’ attempts to pursue a course of independent development outside the U.S. sphere; and containing the possibility of challenges to U.S. dominance from other powerful states.

Does that summary sound like radical hysteria? Recall this statement from President Jimmy Carter’s 1980 State of the Union address: “An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.” Democrats and Republicans, before and after, followed the same policy.



Imperial Delusions


_________________
"The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the powerful" Hammurabi

"We can't all be Sam the Sham; some of us have to be Pharoahs" Larry, brother of Darrel, and his other brother Daryl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slumberjack
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 923
Location: squelch~~big waves and high smiles from the stomach and intestine of capital.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
I believe that their self-interested motives have, for once, produced a good result in the overthrow of a dictator.


Well, I have to say that the whole thing frankly doesn't improve upon the sort of 'ends justify the means' defence of imperialism that we've been hearing ad nauseum from the usual apologenstia. What do you think they'll replace the dictatorship with? Freedom and democracy no doubt. The truth is marching on appears at the nub of what you're going on about, to which the word bullshit figures as the most complimentary response.
_________________
There is this old notion, Bolshevik, a little frigid for sure; the building of the Party. I think that our present war is about giving new content to this depopulated fiction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> The Middle East and Central Asia All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
TATToday's Active Topics


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group