EnMasse Forum Index EnMasse
This place is all that is left.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   TATToday's Active Topics 
 ProfileProfile   Voting CentreVoting Centre   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
  Front PageFront Page Front Page SubmissionsFront Page Submissions LinksLinks Acceptable Use PolicyAcceptable Use Policy  DonateDonate 

 

 


Obesity, health and society
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> Body and Soul
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:07 am    Post subject: Obesity, health and society Reply with quote

Controversial gym ad warns that aliens will eat overweight people

Quote:
The following statement is from a new advertisement campaign for one of the largest health clubs in the UK: "Advance health warning! When the aliens come, they will eat the fatties first." Apparently, quite a few people were offended by it. From The Telegraph:

Quote:
Vicky Palmer contacted the health club (attached to Bristol's Cadbury House hotel) to complain after seeing an advert similar to the sign in a local newspaper. Mrs Palmer, who had an eating disorder as a teen, said the sign and adverts should be removed.

"I am not overweight yet I still find this extremely offensive and patronising, but how much more so to someone genuinely overweight?," she said. Yatton councillor Tony Moulin described the sign as "tacky". Mr Moulin said: "I think this sign is insensitive, tacky and could cause offence to some people."

Manager at the health club Jason Eaton said: "The alien campaign has been developed as a tongue in cheek look at the fact that people, generally, over the Christmas period do put on a little weight.

Manager at the health club Jason Eaton said: "The alien campaign has been developed as a tongue in cheek look at the fact that people, generally, over the Christmas period do put on a little weight.

"We do not intend to cause any offence to anyone.

_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obesity's disease burden worse than smoking

Quote:
Obesity is emerging as a greater threat to public health than smoking, a U.S. study suggests.

The largest ongoing health survey interviewed more than 3.5 million American adults every year from 1993 to 2008.

As smoking rates tailed off in the U.S., the proportion of smokers among American adults fell from 22.7 per cent in 1993 to 18 per cent in 2008, while obesity rates rose from 14.5 per cent to 26.7 per cent over the same time period.

"This study estimated the overall burden of smoking and obesity over time and results indicate that because of the marked increase in the proportion of obese people, obesity has become an equal, if not greater, contributor to the burden of disease than smoking," Haomiao Jia of Columbia University and Dr. Erica Lubetkin of the City University of New York, concluded in the February issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Such data are important for setting targets to reduce health risks of obesity, they said.

"I think what the study is showing is that the burden to society from obesity is probably greater than that of tobacco use, which has been the yardstick that people used," said Dr. Mark Tremblay, an international expert in child obesity research at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa.

The burden to society from tobacco use is also substantial, Tremblay said in cautioning against pitting smoking against obesity.

"We can no longer wait to act on strategies to put in place to promote healthy, active living in Canada, and prevent further increases in obesity," he added.


more @ link
_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Cruel Kindess," a 1967 UK educational film about childhood obesity

Quote:
Jack Sargeant says: "The Wellcome Trust - Britain's largest and most unique medical archive - has a channel at YouTube where they are posting archival medical films and films about the archive. Titles you can watch include a 1917 documentary on War Neuroses and footage of a Henry Wellcome archeological dig."

From the description for "Cruel Kindess," a 1967 UK educational film about childhood obesity

Quote:
This extremely enjoyable film, which contains excellent footage of late 1960's home life, attitudes to food and meal times, addresses obesity in children. A female GP narrates the story of three children who are overweight for their age stressing that although there may be some inherited causes of their obesity, it is mostly due to over-feeding on the part of the parents, what the GP calls a cruel kindness.


One interesting thing about this film is that the most of the "obese" children in it look like average kids today.

_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if obesity is a bigger problem to public health than smoking, are they now going to persecute the overweight the way they've systematically persecuted smokers for a couple of decades?

No overweight people allowed within three meters of a doorway or air intake...no eating on airplane flights... not allowed to eat in beer parlours, bars, pubs, cafe's, restaurants or other public places...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Willow
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 264
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If someone is smoking in the same room as me, I have to breathe 2nd hand smoke. If someone is overweight in the same room it does not affect me. I see a big difference.
_________________
There is a wisdom of the head, and....a wisdom of the heart. Charles Dickens
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Timebandit
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not allowing smokers to make the people around them ill with their fumes is not persecution. That some smokers feel entitled to give me an instant headache and expose me to carcinogens that I've opted not to put in my body by making the decision not to smoke rather than step outside for their fix is narcissistic in the extreme.

What you do to your body is your own business, be it food, alcohol or nicotine. As long as your nicotine delivery system doesn't mean I have to cede the decision about what to put or not put in my body, I don't have a problem with it. Sadly, cigarette smoking in public means that non-smokers do cede, and that's unreasonable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree completely. I do not have the right to inflict on you the smoke and smell of my cigarettes. That's not what bothers me about this latest statement about obesity being more of a threat to public health than smoking...instead of knee jerking and assuming I want to fill your lungs with my second hand smoke, look at the b.s. the government and a concerted group of do-gooders can pull off...maybe you wouldn't mind paying for two seats on a bus...or a plane...because I have to tell you it would annoy the supreme hell out of me to be squashed against the wall because someone needed more room. I've actually been in that position on a plane...I had the "window" seat...the person next to me was past large to huge...the arm rests fold back, you know...the overflow was , at first, annoying...the large arm, the elbow ...then try to climb over to get to the bathroom...it was a crowded plane, I couldn't switch seats...I've been on a bus with the same kind of neighbour-pressure...so what if they start charging extra for the "over" weight...or deciding that for the good of your health you're restricted to the dietetic menu...or...for the betterment of public health...

I actually do not mind the present anti-smoking restrictions. I'm not going to go into a nic fit, start foaming at the mouth, or screaming or... and there is always nicotine gum...

They never come out and admit they've found a new way to charge you more in return for less...it's always for the good of your health..or your peace of mind...or some damn thing...and it costs you more...the damn Harmonized sales tax, for example...or the cap-and-trade tax..or... it always winds up costing you more...at the pump or at the store or both...

and now they have a new target group...public health threat this time...

You think I'm going overboard and being paranoid? Give them five years. Did you really believe five years ago that the price of gas would skyrocket...? Well, didja? And it's all for your own good, you understand. It has nothing to do with the massive profit the oil industry is making, nothing to do with that at all... used to bail out an open boat after a rain, now they are bailing out banks and car manufacturing companies...and YOU will pay for that...

where in hell do you think all the money comes from that they play around with so cavalierly?

And now they have a new target group...oh, oopsie, the health mavens just announced that a raw brocolli diet is healthy and will peel the pounds off you..now watch the price of brocolli head for the clouds...surtax on potato chips...surtax on chocolate bars...huge sur tax on black forest cake... all for your own good, you understand...

And you thought I was whining because I couldn't smoke a cigarette in the pub? Wait until the price of beer doubles because it's proven to add pounds and inches...wait until the chicken wings and buffalo wings sur tax comes along because it's proven such "snack" food or "bar" food is causing people to put on inches ...

You'll pay. They'll figure out a way to allow each of us 1500 calories a day and then you pay overweight tax on anything more than that...

Flaherty is probably already trying to find bean counters to work on it.

He's too dim to figure it out himself. He'll have to hire some number people.

And you'll pay for that, too.

I don't mind not being able to smoke in church, or in a movie theatre. I never did, not even before it was banned.

Now can we do something about people who drench themselves in that godawful Axe body scent and then get on public transit or come sit next to me while I'm having soup and a sandwich in the diner?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Axe should certainly be banned. No argument there.

While we're on the ban-wagon, a big chunk of North America's obesity problem could be solved by eliminating some food additives like high fructose corn syrup and any added fats. Then slap a big-ass tax on highly processed/low nutritional fast food, and use the money to subsidize low-processed/unprocessed/high nutritional food. Change the agriculture and food distribution system so that there's a cumulative manufacturer's tax on each additional processing & transport step, and put that money towards supporting local, sustainable growers ...

And ditch pop. Seriously. Pop should at the very least be twice as expensive as fruit juice or milk.

I know plenty of people who slimmed down considerably when they cut junk food and pop out of their daily diet.

In effect, let's take a good, hard look at our food system before we start pointing accusatory fingers at overweight or obese people. It's no coincidence that obesity and poverty are linked, when the least nutritious and most calorie-laden foods are the cheapest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tehanu wrote:
While we're on the ban-wagon...


Outlaw Monsanto.
_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Vundo Draxon
Leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1712

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tehanu wrote:

And ditch pop. Seriously. Pop should at the very least be twice as expensive as fruit juice or milk.


Some of the stuff that passes for fruit juice is like non-carbonated pop. Maybe a little Vitamin C has been added for good measure, but it's still full of sugar. As someone who's expressed interest in losing a few pounds, juice is one of those things I've been warned to watch out for...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vundo Draxon wrote:
Tehanu wrote:

And ditch pop. Seriously. Pop should at the very least be twice as expensive as fruit juice or milk.


Some of the stuff that passes for fruit juice is like non-carbonated pop. Maybe a little Vitamin C has been added for good measure, but it's still full of sugar. As someone who's expressed interest in losing a few pounds, juice is one of those things I've been warned to watch out for...

One of my all time favourite juices is cold-pressed 100% pineapple juice. That stuff is absolutely phenomenal, and has no sugar added.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Timebandit
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

anne, I'm grateful that you're not one of the smokers who think going outside is unreasonable. They are out there, and I find the argument pretty hard to take.

I'm sympathetic to the problems of people who have weight issues - my kids' godlessmother is in the morbidly obese category. She doesn't travel. Flying is pretty much out of the question, and I've watched her struggle for years on restricted calorie diets. The problem is, after following the dieting advice given her over the years, her weight has fluctuated up and down so much that the diets don't really work. Now knee problems have left her in a difficult place because exercise is painful, but the only way she can lose weight.

I agree with Tehanu that our food system needs to be overhauled. The amount of crap in food is disgusting. But I also think we need to educate kids on some of the physiological issues and food.

I don't know that it's possible for government to control calories, and it's not like they restrict alcohol or cigarette consumption. Anyway, I hope not to be topped out at 1500 calories a day, as I'm sure I consume more than that.

Don't even get me started on perfume junkies... Agh. I had to move three rows back at my kid's violin concert last year because one of the other orchestra mothers had doused herself in scent and my eyes were watering, sinuses filling up - and the headache. Allergies suck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vundo Draxon
Leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1712

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:

One of my all time favourite juices is cold-pressed 100% pineapple juice. That stuff is absolutely phenomenal, and has no sugar added.


Is it sold in the same section as Five Alive? I'm not saying juice is bad, I'm saying that we have to watch out for beverages sold as juice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vundo Draxon wrote:
TS. wrote:

One of my all time favourite juices is cold-pressed 100% pineapple juice. That stuff is absolutely phenomenal, and has no sugar added.


Is it sold in the same section as Five Alive? I'm not saying juice is bad, I'm saying that we have to watch out for beverages sold as juice.

No, it's not. I checked out the ingredients and while I'm sure there are flavour additives (as there are in all pasteurized juices - they don't have to list them on the ingredients if they are derived from the fruit the juice is made of) there is no sugar added. The only ingredient listed is pineapple juice.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My tantrum is based on much of what Tehanu has more calmly and sanely outlined. My grandgrrrrrrrrrls are FN, and that connecton has made me "grandma" to about a dozen other FN kids who share no DNA with me but call me "grandma" and , because I have allowed that, expect me to behave as and BE exactly that. Their grandma.

The link between poverty and shit-food is, I feel, undeniable. And it's no use yammering on about "education" because some highly educated people I know, regardless of racial background, are huge.

People think it is "funny" and "cute" and even "odd" that I flat-out refuse to buy pop. My grrrrrrrrrls go to "Friday night dinner and a movie", it's a huge social thing for the short set in Tahsis, and after dinner the kids get a bag of popcorn, then watch a recent-release video on the big screen which was donated to the Rec Centre. And I buy the grrrrrrrls juice. Other kids have pop. There was some nagging at first (everyone else....) but now, if asked, the grrrrls just say "grandma won't buy pop". One of the grrrrrrrrrls says "grandma won't buy poison"...but pop sales are a steady source of income for the Rec Centre. And when I tried to get pop banned, I got no support at all.

And chips. Jeebus, how many kinds are there? BBQ, blue cheese, chive, ketchup...and on and on...and "cheezies", and...

Poor people often do not have the transportation to get to the stores which sell good quality food. Even in towns and cities with public transit, it is not easy to go shopping ... and it is in the poorer areas of town you have the stores which sell mostly processed crap...

don't believe me. Take a half a day and go to the poorer end of town and look, really look, at the stores and what is in them. When you've got two kids dragging at your coat and you have to carry bags of groceries and use a bus and...you grab what you can and get it over with and as long as their bellies have something in it you think you've done what's needed.

My grandgrrrrrrls think it is funny that in this house Alpha-Getti is only for a treat...they seldom get it...Lilli will get some canned "rabioli" this weekend because she just lost her first baby tooth and the tooth fairy is coming tonight, but they know they don't get it as a regular thing. Ditto Krap Dinner...and when they do get KD they get it with extra real cheese grated in...(they love it that way)

But for some of their cousins KD is supper. With sliced white bread (it is cheaper to buy that "fog" than to bake real bread)...

And do you seriously think Harpo and his boys are going to in any way at all inconvenience CocaCola or Pepsi or whoever is making cheap crap food? Those money interests support Harpo and his gang.

Jeebus, you'd think this was a subject about which I had a strong opinion!

Sorry for that.
(not really)

They do things and allow things without telling us...every potato sold in a supermarket in Canada in the past ten years has been irradiated...and nobody told you that...try, just try, to find spuds grown in your area, or even grown in Canada...out here most of the spuds in supermarkets come from Idaho or Oregon...

Food distribution SHOULD be a scandal. Perhaps not on the same scale as the torture of detainees in the middle east, but damn close.

And now that they've encouraged this "fatso" crisis...do you really think their solution will put the cost on the companies? YOU are going to pay for "carbon capture" and you are who will pay for whatever steps they take to slim down the morbidly obese.

And the corporations who support the major political parties will continue to make obscene profit. And children will be damaged for life.

Capitalism. Ain't it great! Three cheers for the marketplace.

The politics of food is a very dirty politic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donna
Member


Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 62
Location: Edmonton, AB

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If obesity is such a problem, then perhaps the Canadian government should put a tax on all fast foods and every other "bad-for-you" product, just like they do with cigarettes and alcohol.

Smokers pay for their addiction. I started smoking ten years ago at approximately $7.50/pack. Now, a package of cigarettes run me $12.50/pack. And you know what? I understand why it's like that. If I have made the choice to slowly kill myself, that's my problem, and I shouldn't be a drain on the health care system because I've chosen to smoke. I also don't smoke indoors (and never have), and try to avoid all human contact while doing so. But I do have on gripe on this note: why are the ashtrays always next to the entrance to public places? I personally prefer not to litter my butts where ever, but having the ashtrays in places where non-smokers frequent tends to make it difficult to satisfy anyone.

So anyway, let's tax those things that cause these "grievous" problems. Obesity has just as many health issues (heart problems as the result of high blood pressures and cholesterol, Type 2 diabetes, joint problems/arthritis, mobility concerns, etc.) as smoking or alcoholism. Tax it all. That is the Canadian solution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with the proposal to tax unhealthy foods with one caveat: the money gained from those taxes must be specifically ear-marked for good nutrition policies, including subsidies for local and organic food production, subsidies for low-processed and unprocessed food, nutrition education for kids (when I was in elementary school we had a couple sessions on learning to read the nutrition labels on food and they have stood me in good stead) and public education campaigns for adults and for providing meals that are both healthy and tasty in school cafeterias, hospitals and shelters.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All I ask, if we're going to start taxing "unhealthy" food, is that we do so rationally and scientifically, not emotionally. And we do it across the board. No sense adding a whack of tax to a Snickers bar, while letting me buy a kilogram of pure sugar untaxed.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senor Magoo wrote:
All I ask, if we're going to start taxing "unhealthy" food, is that we do so rationally and scientifically, not emotionally. And we do it across the board. No sense adding a whack of tax to a Snickers bar, while letting me buy a kilogram of pure sugar untaxed.

The thing about that kilogram of pure sugar is that you aren't necessarily going to eat it all at once. Many recipes call for small amounts of sugar (and I don't mean desert recipes or even recipes for sweet dishes). Two years ago I bought a bag of sugar and I haven't used even half of it to this point.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The thing about that kilogram of pure sugar is that you aren't necessarily going to eat it all at once.


OK, but I also don't have to eat that Snickers bar all at once.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senor Magoo wrote:
Quote:
The thing about that kilogram of pure sugar is that you aren't necessarily going to eat it all at once.


OK, but I also don't have to eat that Snickers bar all at once.

No, that's true, but which do you think is more likely: sitting down with a spoon and eating that bag of sugar, or scarfing back the snickers bar in one sitting?
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd go for something less extreme, like eating roughly the same amount of sugar (in cookies, muffins, on cereal, etc.) as is in the Snickers.

But we seem to have found a fly in the ointment. It's hard to say that any one particular food item is a problem, unless we know whether it's being consumed responsibly or irresponsibly. And that's exactly why I expressed my hope that if we go down this road, we can do so objectively and scientifically, and not based on how much we hate McDonald's.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rufus Polson
Purple Library Guy


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3483
Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vundo Draxon wrote:
TS. wrote:

One of my all time favourite juices is cold-pressed 100% pineapple juice. That stuff is absolutely phenomenal, and has no sugar added.


Is it sold in the same section as Five Alive? I'm not saying juice is bad, I'm saying that we have to watch out for beverages sold as juice.


One rule of thumb is, if it says "cocktail" or "drink" rather than "juice", you better look at those ingredients pretty deuced closely. Every once in a while you see a "cocktail" that *doesn't* have masses of sugar added, but it's pretty rare.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rufus Polson
Purple Library Guy


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3483
Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
Senor Magoo wrote:
All I ask, if we're going to start taxing "unhealthy" food, is that we do so rationally and scientifically, not emotionally. And we do it across the board. No sense adding a whack of tax to a Snickers bar, while letting me buy a kilogram of pure sugar untaxed.

The thing about that kilogram of pure sugar is that you aren't necessarily going to eat it all at once. Many recipes call for small amounts of sugar (and I don't mean desert recipes or even recipes for sweet dishes). Two years ago I bought a bag of sugar and I haven't used even half of it to this point.


Well, if you're using it that way then a bit of tax on that bag of sugar won't set you back a whole lot per year, so no biggie, right? And I'd have to admit that I use my bags o' sugar to a goodly extent for making cakes and brownies and whatnot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Timebandit
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But one could still say that a muffin, in spite of its sugar, likely has more nutritional value than a chocolate bar.

It's not just the calories, but the empty calories that cause problems. And food can't always be judged in isolation - it's always tied to the physical fitness of the individual and the level of activity engaged in.

I also have a couple of friends who are diabetic and are both heavily into athletic activities (one runs marathons and the other is a martial artist) - they both carry a chocolate bar most of the time. Apparently it can be easy to misjudge insulin dosages when paired with intense physical activity, and it's a safety thing...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
A_J
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 362

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
I agree with the proposal to tax unhealthy foods with one caveat: . . . subsidies for local and organic food production.

Well, it doesn't really matter what you do with the money that is collected - the mere fact that the tax exists will raise prices and lower demand for unhealthy products.

But one question - what does the point of origin (local versus "not local") of a particular food item have to do with how healthy it is? Will I get fatter eating apples that came from Chile than if I ate apples from Nova Scotia?

Like Magoo said: any tax should be rational, and I would add that it should not be used to simply funnel cash to favoured interest groups who really have nothing to do with the issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A_J wrote:
TS. wrote:
I agree with the proposal to tax unhealthy foods with one caveat: . . . subsidies for local and organic food production.

Well, it doesn't really matter what you do with the money that is collected - the mere fact that the tax exists will raise prices and lower demand for unhealthy products.

But one question - what does the point of origin (local versus "not local") of a particular food item have to do with how healthy it is? Will I get fatter eating apples that came from Chile than if I ate apples from Nova Scotia?

Like Magoo said: any tax should be rational, and I would add that it should not be used to simply funnel cash to favoured interest groups who really have nothing to do with the issue.

Because environmental factors are also health related. Human health is impacted if we have a more polluted atmosphere, so incentives that reduce emissions from the transportation industry are beneficial to human health. Obesity and overweight are not the only problems that arise from unhealthy food.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
A_J
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 362

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, that's a bit of a stretch, especially in light of your earlier caveat that the revenues raised:

TS wrote:
must be specifically ear-marked for good nutrition policies

Now it's anything and everything tangentially related to "human health" . . . which would ultimately encompass everything that government does (policing, emergency services, defence, education, and on and on). In that case the money might as well just go into the general revenue.

Now, obviously we do need to cut our greenhouse gas emissions, I would just prefer to do it in a way that doesn't involve harmful and discriminatory trade practices. I see no reason to punish the Chilean apple grower simply because they're not Canadian (and your pineapple juice is hardly coming from Saskatchewan).

Besides, subsidies - especially for corn - caused the obesity problem in the first place (not to mention a slew of other problems from world hunger and third-world underdevelopment to terrorism), more subsidies aren't going to solve it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TS.
Delicious schadenfreude


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14585
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right, ensuring that local farmers can continue to produce is punishing the Chilean apple growers. Those apples from Chile likely come to Canada by boat. Marine bunker fuel is one of the dirtiest and most polluting fuels used on the planet. It makes a lot more sense to eat locally grown apples that don't need to travel nearly as far and also thereby help keep rural areas vibrant.

I must say, claiming that subsidies for local food production will cause more terrorism is a truly awesome entry in the contest for most ridiculous argument ever.
_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." - Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
A_J
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 362

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TS. wrote:
Those apples from Chile likely come to Canada by boat. Marine bunker fuel is one of the dirtiest and most polluting fuels used on the planet. It makes a lot more sense to eat locally grown apples that don't need to travel nearly as far and also thereby help keep rural areas vibrant.

Of course, the same would apply to Canadian exports of agricultural products. Farmers in this country grow more wheat, grains, etc. than Canadians can consume (just as Chileans grow more apples than they can eat and Costa Ricans grow more pineapples than they need). I mean, if you're taking a stance that we shouldn't buy foreign food from Chile or Costa Rica or wherever, then our trading partners shouldn't be buying what we grow either, should they?

TS. wrote:
I must say, claiming that subsidies for local food production will cause more terrorism is a truly awesome entry in the contest for most ridiculous argument ever.

You're seriously unable to see the relationship? Agricultural subsidies, especially the billions spent protecting privileged farmers in the U.S. and Europe, are directly responsible for poverty in the developing world and all of the ills that stem from that. This is pretty basic stuff. Surely you weren't under some illusion that "they" "hate our freedoms" or something silly like that?

Imagine you're a farmer in Afghanistan (or Somalia or Pakistan or wherever). You'd like to make a living growing wheat or some other crop, but unfortunately some purportedly progressive types in the west turn up their noses at the idea of buying your foreign food. Worse, they have their governments throw money at farmers who are a little more "local", resulting in overproduction and significantly reduced prices for your crop. The result is continued poverty, reduced opportunities and a very good reason to resent the west.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rufus Polson
Purple Library Guy


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3483
Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A_J wrote:

But one question - what does the point of origin (local versus "not local") of a particular food item have to do with how healthy it is? Will I get fatter eating apples that came from Chile than if I ate apples from Nova Scotia?


Well, long distance travel and long term storage tend to result in food in which a fair amount of the vitamins have broken down by the time you eat it. Some of the money might also go towards promoting seasonal eating.

All this sort of thing also, as TS points out, is good for the environment and reduces energy use. And yes, our trading partners probably shouldn't be buying what we grow. The large scale of trade in food has I think not been great for us, but it's *really* distorted third world economies badly. Countries in general should be more food self-sufficient; trade in food should be more of an edge case than it is. If we sell less and import less, it's a wash in terms of trade balance but a win in terms of reduced waste.

Quote:
You're seriously unable to see the relationship? Agricultural subsidies, especially the billions spent protecting privileged farmers in the U.S. and Europe, are directly responsible for poverty in the developing world and all of the ills that stem from that. This is pretty basic stuff. Surely you weren't under some illusion that "they" "hate our freedoms" or something silly like that?


When TS talks about subsidies for local production, it's pretty clear he's talking about local production for local markets, not for export. Yes, of course heavily subsidized US and European agriculture *for export* have fucked over the developing world. The flip side of that is that plantation agriculture of non-staple and even non-food crops *for export* in the developing world have fucked over the developing world. This has actually been the case for hundreds of years in Latin America, where crops such as sugar have created poverty and wasteland ever since colonial times.
This is, as you say, pretty basic stuff. So no, orienting our food production towards our own local markets will not create resentment in the third world, it will help them get out from under the crap we've been dumping on them for ages.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with Rufus on this. I first tasted pineapple juice when I was fifteen. I have been mad about all things pineapple since then.

Until: I read about the pineapple industry and how third world farmers who were working land which had been in the family for at least four generations were kicked off the land because they had no ownership papers...and the pineapple conglomerate moved in on their land, mon-cropped it, put a road through it, gave a few of them marginal jobs in a production plant and those who didn't get work became homeless, jobless, and basically doomed...

and my love of pineapples began to wither...and the more I learned about the power behind my pineapple juice the more I turned to tap water to drink...

and ditto tomatoes. There is room in the tomato industry for the international court to charge them with crimes against humanity...

and corn....
and...

imported food might just as well be fertilized with the blood of peasant farmers...

we need to be self sufficient in food, but it's all a mess. A deliberate mess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tehanu
More or less, more or less


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 17640
Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation

PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems calorie counts for fast food outlets and frozen supermarket food are often way under. So snarfing down that Whopper, or Lean Cuisine pre-prepared pap, may indeed mean you're eating more than you thought you were.

Quote:
... A U.S. study of 10 chain restaurants, including Wendy's and Ruby Tuesday, found that the number of calories in 29 meals or other menu items was an average of 18 per cent higher than listed.

And frozen supermarket meals from Lean Cuisine, Weight Watchers, Healthy Choice and South Beach Living had eight per cent more calories than the labels said, according to the study, published in this month's Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

The researchers and other experts aren't accusing restaurants and food companies of trying to deceive customers. They said most of the discrepancies can be explained by variations in ingredients, portion sizes and testing methods. For example, the teenager behind the counter might have put too much mayonnaise on one sandwich.

Still, "if every time you eat out, you get a couple of hundred calories or more than you think, that can add up really easily," said lead researcher Susan Roberts, a professor of nutrition at Tufts University. "There's a big drumbeat for people putting calories on menus, but that's only useful if the calories are right."

... The study showed most of the packaged food tested fell within the 20 per cent margin of error allowed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.


Anyone else a bit taken aback that the FDA has a 20% margin of error?

Now I'm not terribly concerned about calorie counts, but I do eyeball the amount of fat in something (less and less, though, as I continue to try and avoid processed food). This also makes me wonder about the accuracy of nutritional labels in terms of vitamin and mineral content as well ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gawd, I'm glad I'm heading on toward 73 and grew up dirt poor! We continue what we learned as children and in our family we ate at home, at the table, together. Period. As close to "processed" food as we ever got was when the local supermarket had an "introductory sale" on Kraft processed cheese "food", I remember it came in a foot-long block, in a blue package. They were almost giving it away so Annie brought some home. We tried it, we agreed it was "different" and tasted "okay" but she went back to real cheese as soon as the block of glup was finished. The "hundred mile diet" wasn't known then, but it was what we had, and I was in my teens before I tasted pineapple juice (and fell totally under its' magical spell.).

We picked fruit when it was ripe, from my grandpa's trees. Apples were carefully wrapped in paper and stored, gently, in a big cardboard box. My grandma and my Auntie Jean had lovely barrels, with wrapped apples in them. Everything else went into jars. We picked blackberries until our fingers were so stained with juice it took days of dishwashing to get them clean again.

A restaurant? Heh. Once in a blue moon we went to the Fish'n'Chip shop and on really rare occasions we went, with our own pots, up to Chinatown to Number 13 Chop Suey House where they filled our pots with chow mein and we raced home with it.

In Tahsis, today, we have a couple of small cafe's and once in a blue moon I take the treasures there for "poutine" which probably in no way resembles the real thing. I cook mostly from scratch except for spaghetti sauce, I cheat and use the commercial kind in bottles...and add it to my own "fridge mix"...aging vegetables get chopped or grated and sort'a kind'a stirfried before the "spaghetti sauce" is added...

counting calories? I don't. I'm about the same size I've been for the past forty years, people say I am "lean" if they're kind, "skinny" if they're unkind. My kids are all lean, my FN in-laws are all dreadfully overweight with type two diabetes, and it's sad but it's part of the Residential School Sydrome and will take generations to solve. My treasures are lean, and they are the only ones in the vast extended family who do not have silver caps on what little is left of their teeth. And that's a sin, but one we will not as a culture address.

I know their mom uses far more canned and procesed stuff than I do and I say nothing about it. I'm not into pushing rocks uphill with my nose, she does the best she can with what she knows, and she's the best mom a little treasure could have. She's doing her grade twelve, now, and is determined to graduate, and she doesnt' use as much crap food as she did when I first met her, but she's the only one who insists on toothbrushing and mouthwash afterward...

Poor people, especially those who are second or third (or more) generation dirt poor, oppressed, marginalized and ignored haven't been given the opportunity to understand the importance of nutrition. They just want to fill those empty bellies.

Count calories? Not an issue. MacDonalds', etc., aren't in Tahsis, and the few times we go Out, a visit there is a huge treat for the treasures. And since it's only once in a while, it doesn't bother me that they're eating glup with ketchup. I'll make up for it the next day with a raw veggie plate and a home-made dip. Even their cousins have learned to enjoy that.

We do what we can. And sometimes, it isn't easy.

But I'm glad I was born 'way back when people knew how to prepare real food. My treasures reap the benefit of that several times a week when they have supper here, with me, at the table with the TV turned off and the conversation dominated by "what I learned in school today".

It's the best I can manage for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting that back in the day, a bit of poverty would push you toward potatoes, rice, dry beans and garden vegetables, rather than toward processed convenience junk.

Conversely, nothing's more chi-chi these days than food that used to be peasant food: osso bucco, pork belly, brisket, or even "heirloom" vegetables that used to be quite commonplace (eg: a Brandywine tomato).

My own upbringing was a curious hybrid. My parents would scold our in-laws for buying frozen, pre-made hamburgers and frozen vegetables, and yet the only rice my parents ever made was boil-in-the-bag. We'd buy fresh-baked bread from a bakery, and then make sandwiches of rectangular pink ham and Miracle Whip.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
swirrlygrrl
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 321

PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On calorie counts, the article's writing makes me think that they only tested the calorie counts of one of each item. While informative, I'd be more interested in knowing if there was systematic undercounting of calories in the foods tested (i.e. most Lean Cuisine dinners had significantly more calories).

For restaurant food, I think calorie and fat counts should be provided on the menu as a guide, but they should be interpreted as the likely minimum amount of fat and calories in the dish. I've worked in family-oriented restaurants - I don't recall the cooks ever underutilizing the oil, cheese, side dishes, etc. A full plate meant value to the customer. I also worked someplace with unlimited bread and butter available with a meal...I have to think if the calorie count of each loaf and ramekin was advertised in any way, people would have eaten quite a bit less of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh gawd, that rectangular pink "ham"...I had an aunt used to fry it and give it to us with scrambled eggs. Her house was the first place I ever tasted "catsup". You can imagine the jokes about the name!

Am I the only one left who cooks turnip? WHich I'm now told isn't "turnip" at all, but "rutabaga". The big yellow ones with the almost purple top...we called them "Swede turnip"...love'em, mashed, with butter. Does anyone else eat parsnips? boiled, baked, in soups, stews...yum! And who else grows dandelions deliberately? great for salads, or quick-steamed with a drop of vinegar. Pepper grass grows everywhere here, toss it in with your rhubarb chard...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raos
volatilis vir


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 5472
Location: Petropolis

PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cooks it? When it's so delicious just freshly cut up into sticks and snacked on?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 1:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And kohl rabi...does anyone else like kohl rabi? Cooked or raw...

I'm making "fridge stew" tonight...tired vegetables...and I had some left over deer meat plus some left over pork tenderloin roast so that and some bouillon (however in hell you spell it) with a dash of vinegar, mustard, and brown sugar...now cook, you bugger, I'll have it over mashed spuds...

did you know that you can use the "core" of a cabbage... put it in the stew, let it simmer forever, even if it's too woody to chew and eat it adds good flavour and if it's not really appetisingly edible the crows will make short work of it the next day...

I don't eat carrots. People tell me how sweet they are, how delicious...all my life I put carrot in my mouth and there's a metallic taste, same as if I had put a penny under my tongue.

and to hell with the "night vision" story! How far do you need to see in the dark, anyway?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Timebandit
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use turnip (swede if you're English) in a couple of things. I have a shepherd's pie recipe that includes diced carrot and turnip with lamb... Cheese on top of the mashed potatoes. Good stuff.

I grew up with "processed cheese slices", the ones individually wrapped in plastic. The square ham, too. Bakery bread was too expensive, we bought the mass-produced stuff. Margarine instead of butter. Lots and lots of canned vegetables. And then there was the period of time that my mother discovered that she could buy powdered milk cheaper than fresh and look! we never run out!

Lumpy milk. Ugh.

So while my mother was a convert to the canned/frozen/cheap-shit food revolution, I had the good fortune of having my father's side of the family and their obsession with growing their own food. My dad's uncle was the best market gardener in the valley (less than a half hour drive from the city), and we got corn, potatoes, carrots, turnip, onions, cabbage, tomatoes and corn at a reduced price (if we paid) from Uncle Harvey - and he was the one who knew where the fiddleheads were in spring, too. My grandmother, mad as a hatter, and her sister had serious city gardens. Auntie Annie's was her whole yard - she didn't care to have a lawn (she also baked all her own bread, heavenly stuff!). They were the only people I knew who had compost heaps. We picked saskatoon berries because my father knew where to find them and they weren't something you could buy back then and the wild ones are the best anyway. If we happened to be out near one of the Hutterite colonies, Dad would stop and buy farm butter and cream so thick it couldn't be poured. And he hunted, too. I remember the year he got an elk... We didn't eat beef for a long, long time! Deer sausage, ducks, geese. My grandmother and all my aunties canned their own fruit, too.

I don't know that I'd have developed a taste for the fresh veggies and real bread and such if it hadn't been for that influence. They loved their food, but there wasn't a chunky one in the bunch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Timebandit
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

swirrlygrrl wrote:
On calorie counts, the article's writing makes me think that they only tested the calorie counts of one of each item. While informative, I'd be more interested in knowing if there was systematic undercounting of calories in the foods tested (i.e. most Lean Cuisine dinners had significantly more calories).

For restaurant food, I think calorie and fat counts should be provided on the menu as a guide, but they should be interpreted as the likely minimum amount of fat and calories in the dish. I've worked in family-oriented restaurants - I don't recall the cooks ever underutilizing the oil, cheese, side dishes, etc. A full plate meant value to the customer. I also worked someplace with unlimited bread and butter available with a meal...I have to think if the calorie count of each loaf and ramekin was advertised in any way, people would have eaten quite a bit less of it.


I really don't want to look at calorie counts when I go out to dinner. I'm still going to eat what I'm going to eat, I'm just not going to enjoy it as much. And that sucks. Food is meant to be a sensual experience.

I think part of the problem is that we've divorced food from the experience of eating. It's all meant to be fast, fast, fast, with no thought to savouring or thinking about it or really enjoying it. It's uniform, salty and sugary. Most fast and convenience food doesn't taste like much of anything, does it? Where's the pleasure? Then add a load of guilt... Punishing people doesn't make them change their behaviour. It just makes them quit trying. Shovel it in, try not to think to hard about it, feel bad about it later, rinse and repeat.

I think we'd be better off teaching kids about the pleasures of food and how to savour it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
A_J
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 362

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rufus Polson wrote:
So no, orienting our food production towards our own local markets will not create resentment in the third world, it will help them get out from under the crap we've been dumping on them for ages.

Yes, ending subsidised food production in the developed world and the subsequent dumping of that food will help immeasurably. No, preventing foreign farmers from exporting their crops to Canada (by favouring and privileging "local" farmers) isn't going to help anyone.

"Self-sufficiency" in food production (or anything else) is silly. We don't expect individuals, families, towns or even provinces to produce everything they use (food, medicine, clothing, automobiles, electronics etc.), so why countries?

Timebandit wrote:
I really don't want to look at calorie counts when I go out to dinner. I'm still going to eat what I'm going to eat, I'm just not going to enjoy it as much. And that sucks. Food is meant to be a sensual experience.

I don't mind with fast-food where the food is uniform and not far removed from pre-packaged food. It is useful to have the nutritional information available.

But with a "proper" restaurant I absolutely agree: having calories/sodium/fat/etc. on the menu would cheapen the experience. If people are that worried, they should educate yourself beforehand on what's good or bad for them. It's only with unprepared food or fast-food where the ingredients are not always clear where the information is needed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Timebandit
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I so rarely eat at a fast-food joint that I wouldn't notice.

My version of "fast food" is getting take-out Thai coconut soup at a restaurant that's only a few minutes from here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Legless_Marine
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 575

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A_J wrote:

It's only with unprepared food or fast-food where the ingredients are not always clear where the information is needed.



One shouldn't be lulled by the false sense of security granted by minor variations in the ingredients. There's also a lot that's unsaid between the lines.

Scrutinizing the contents of your FF is like scrutinizing the chemical breakdown of your cigarettes.

Universally, both cigarettes and FF are bad for you - Occasional and mindful use will not harm you - but regular use will shorten your life.

On the converse, strive for an overall quality in your diet, and you needn't trouble yourself with the fine print.
_________________
Enjoying a high standard of living thanks to cheap energy and slave labor - Just like you!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DSquared
aka Aristotleded24


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 5570
Location: Winnipeg

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A_J wrote:
I see no reason to punish the Chilean apple grower simply because they're not Canadian


If these apples are being sent to Canada, it's more likely that the Chilean in question is a poorly-paid labourer for a corporate food-factory outlet.

Besides, if our farmers are so privileged, can you explain why so many of them have to take on off-farm work just to survive? Can you explain why the number of farmers continues to decline. Can you explain why almost no young people want to go into farming? I know you specifically mentioned "US and European farmers." I can't speak for the Europeans, but on-the-ground farmers in the US aren't any better off than their Canadian counterparts. Eric Schosser goes into that a bit in his book Fast Food Nation. And many of the "subsidies" in Canada end up being spent on fertiliser and pesticides, so they end up in the hands of the agri-business corporation, with no benefits to the actual farmers. And that's on top of how others have already explained how transportation also impacts the environment and nutritional quality. So to turn this question around, why should I even look for Chilean apples in Winnipeg when I can buy them from BC, Washington state, or Ontario?
_________________
This is pre-eminently the time, to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself-Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Raos
volatilis vir


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 5472
Location: Petropolis

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

anne cameron wrote:
I don't eat carrots. People tell me how sweet they are, how delicious...all my life I put carrot in my mouth and there's a metallic taste, same as if I had put a penny under my tongue.

and to hell with the "night vision" story! How far do you need to see in the dark, anyway?


That's just crazy. I love carrots. Eat a tonne of them. I wouldn't worry overly much about the night vision, bit, though. It is indeed just a story, started by the British army during WWII to cover up a technological advance they didn't want the Germans to find out about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
anne cameron
Fulltime enMasse Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 3079
Location: tahsis, british columbia

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crazy, huh? My taste buds iz crazy? Nah, what's crazy is taste buds which don't relish the taste of parsnips. Or beets...you grate your beets and simmer them in a heavy cast-iron skillet with lots of garlic and butter, then yum yum...and what's truly crazy is folks who don't like yams... or pickled beets...or sauerkraut...

Maybe I should start a support group for non-crazies who do not like the taste of carrots but have been afraid to admit it because of the overwhelming disapproval of a society which seems to worship the dam things...??

And what's not to enjoy in dandelion leaf salad?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rufus Polson
Purple Library Guy


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 3483
Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Parsnips . . . Sorry Anne, I think I have to go with Ogden Nash on parsnips.

"The parsnip, children, I repeat
is simply an anemic beet.
Some people call the parsnip edible--
myself, I find this claim incredible."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Senor Magoo
He's got a big one


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 8700

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Nah, what's crazy is taste buds which don't relish the taste of parsnips. Or beets...you grate your beets and simmer them in a heavy cast-iron skillet with lots of garlic and butter, then yum yum...and what's truly crazy is folks who don't like yams... or pickled beets...or sauerkraut...


I love all of those, AND carrots. It take my omnivoracity seriously.

Now my dear old dad, he used to buy (or scavenge) some beets and give the beets themselves away so he could just eat the greens.
_________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hephaestion
Deeply Shallow


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 24243
Location: Where the Wild Things Are...

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

anne cameron wrote:
And what's not to enjoy in dandelion leaf salad?


C'mon, and the heads, too! If you pick 'em at just the right time, they have such a wonderful bite!


_________________
"The dignity of an animal is measured by his capacity to revolt in the face of oppression." -- Mikhail Bakunin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EnMasse Forum Index -> Body and Soul All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
TATToday's Active Topics


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group