 |
EnMasse This place is all that is left.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: Polygamy in BC |
|
|
After a complaint to BC's Human Rights Tribunal about a polygamous Mormon group was dismissed, the attorney general is looking at filing criminal charges. The complaint alleged that BC was not doing enough to protect girls as young as 15 from sexual exploitation.
| Quote: | ... B.C. Attorney General Wally Oppal told CBC News that taking action against the community is one of his top priorities.
... Church leaders in Bountiful insist young girls are never forced into a marriage they don't want. But Oppal said their claim could be tested soon in a criminal courtroom.
... Jancis Andrews, one of the women who filed the human rights complaint three years ago, alleges the province had a policy not to prosecute men in Bountiful for polygamy or the sexual exploitation of young girls.
... Andrews said the Crown should have charged male church members who illegally married girls as young as 15. |
CBC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This situation has been an open secret for years. I'm not sure why at least three supposedly different political parties (Socred, LiEbral, NDP) have hemmmed and haaawed and done bugger nothing about it, there is ample evidence that girls have been taken back and forth across the border and married off to men old enough to be their grandpa's, evidence that uncles marry little girls they know to be their neices, and evidence of step-parents marrying girls they helped raise. Which, to my mind , is incest. But time and again, in spite of evidence, charges are not laid.
Recently, there has been a huge split in the congregational colony, and family members no longer have anything to do with each other because some follow the american who claimed to be the leader while others followed the local guy. However the american has been arrested by the FBI and isn't apt to be out and preaching any time soon so maybe that kerfuffle has imploded.
I see it as child sexual abuse and Wally Oppel needs to be ass kicked because for someone who claims this is a top priority he's taken a lot of time to get his thumb out of his bum.
I had some faint hope when Wally went political, his record as a judge was better than most, but...oh well...same old same old I guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Evil Twin Stoned Immaculate

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3748 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | This situation has been an open secret for years. I'm not sure why at least three supposedly different political parties (Socred, LiEbral, NDP) have hemmmed and haaawed and done bugger nothing about it |
It's quite shocking that these people have been allowed to get away with it for so long . Imagine if these were a group of Muslim Polygamists - the MSM, call in shows and rightwing blogs would be full of outrage. There would large numbers of columns by the likes of Mark Steyn pointing to this as evidence that Muslims "can't assimilate into Western culture". In fact I remember one of the main misconceptions during the whole Sharia law controversy in Ontario (2005) being that some were afraid that this would pave the way to polygamy. People like back then pointed out that Muslims only wanted what Jews and Catholics already had - the right to use religious law to settle civil disputes. It had nothing whatsoever to do with polygamy and I remember arguing that the only organized groups of polygamists in North America were white males like this Morman splinter group (there are many others, mostly Morman but some splinter 7th Day Adventists and white supremacists - some heavily armed in compounds - in the US midwest).
Now imagine that this was a group of gay polygamists marrying teenage BOYS - I suspect that the group would have been lynched at the first opportunity by the Free Dominion types. There is one rule in this country for straight white Christian males, and another rule for everyone else.  _________________ I can't support bike lanes. Roads are built for buses, cars, and trucks. My heart bleeds when someone gets killed, but it's their own fault at the end of the day. - Assclown Rob Ford |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's absolutely puzzling how so many successive governments have managed to turn blind eyes to the obvious exploitation of female children.
In 1907 the federal government admitted that fifty per cent of all aboriginal children taken off to residential school died there. And generation after generation of kids were sent to those hell holes... certainly the government was quick to slam Doukhabour kids into New Denver and for years Jehovah Witnesses have had every level of welfare up their noses looking for any excuse at all to snatch kids...for years welfare workers would swoop down without warning on single moms to ensure there was no sign a male was sharing the home with her, the list of government interference goes on and on and on...but these frikken wing nuts seem to be more than merely tolerated, they almost seem to be protected and one does wonder why. Surely to Gawd the RCMP can lay charges...we shouldn't have to wait for the Attorney General to waken from his doze before this mess starts to be cleaned up.
I don't really mind that most of these women, who are little more than brood stock, are on welfare. Whatever else is going on the kids deserve to eat but it does stick in my craw that these men use the welfare system to underwrite their sexual behaviour because there's no way in heaven or hell a man can support a half dozen wives and two dozen offspring!
Be nice if we could vasectomize the patriarchs when the first plural wife gave birth! That wouldn't stop the fuck fest but it might do something to control the growing swarm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | but these frikken wing nuts seem to be more than merely tolerated, they almost seem to be protected and one does wonder why. Surely to Gawd the RCMP can lay charges |
The Religious Tolerance website provides a glimmer of insight into this...
| Quote: | | In 1990, some women who had fled Bountiful demanded an investigation into why the police were ignoring the multiple marriages in the town. Two years later, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) conducted an investigation in Bountiful and recommended that charges of polygamy be laid against two men. 9 The Attorney General of the province of British Columbia decided to not proceed. The office obtained two independent legal opinions. Both agreed that the courts would probably find the federal anti-bigamy law to be unconstitutional. It conflicts with the Mormons' religious freedom as guaranteed by Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- the country's constitution. If brought to court, the Province would probably lose the case. |
Unfortunately, the link contained in the above paragraph doesn't work, so I can't get more detail about the government lawyer's reasoning in this matter.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/lds_poly1.htm
It's an interesting article anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, even granting the province might possibly use the worst damn prosecutors available and lose the case... what about transporting a minor across an international boundary for sexual purposes...what about carnal knowledge of a child...what about sexual abuse...what about the illegality of uncles "marrying" neices and fathering children...
and HOW COME there is no question of violation of religious beliefs when it comes to forcing Jehovah Witness children to have blood transfusions, taking JW children into the (dubious) care of the welfare? They managed to take Doukhabour children away from their families, put them in New Denver with a 13 ft fence separating them from their parents. They forced children from a religion which is strictly vegetarian to eat meat, they gave them instruction in a religion other than their own...
funny how we can kick the shit out of some people and not out of others.
Funny how as long as it's just girls and women being sexually exploited our hands are tied.
Funny how mainstream Mormons seem to reject these splinter group fundies.
SO how come Muslims can't have four wives each?
And how come genital mutilation is against the law here?
I call bullshit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I call bullshit, too. It would be interesting and surprising to see if anti-bigamy legislation would stand up to a freedom of religion challenge. (And yes, I don't know of any religions that allow multiple husbands, so let's stick to polygamy not polyandery).
But the bigger issue is the children who are allegedly being forced into marriage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I don't know of any religions that allow multiple husbands, so let's stick to polygamy not polyandery |
Well then, technically, that should be polygyny, not polygamy.
Polygamy can refer either to multiple husbands or multiple wives. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Senor Magoo He's got a big one

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8700
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to wonder exactly what constitutes "polygamy" (or polygyny) in this context? Certainly, the disgusting old "elders" will be cavorting with multiple young women... that I get. But other than that, the only things marriage typically brings are legal rights (inheritance, divorce, etc.) that the state is certainly under no obligation to respect for wife #2, wife #3, etc.
In other words, any man is free to have sex with as many women as will have him, though only one can have the legal rights of a spouse. I don't see how the men of Bountiful can force Canada to treat wife #2 as a spouse, or wife #3 as a spouse, and so on.
And I would certainly agree that when adults are quite unashamedly having sex with 15 year olds, I wonder why those same adults aren't looking at statutory sexual assault charges. Isn't that the way it usually works?? _________________ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | In other words, any man is free to have sex with as many women as will have him, though only one can have the legal rights of a spouse. I don't see how the men of Bountiful can force Canada to treat wife #2 as a spouse, or wife #3 as a spouse, and so on.
|
I don't know if the issue is so much the men forcing Canada to treat the women as wives. I think the issue is more Canada forcing the men NOT to treat the women as wives. (Assuming that Canada gets around to pressing charges.)
What I'm not clear on is at what point having multiple sexual partners crosses over into polygamy. The "marriages" at Bountiful aren't legally formalized, so they can't be charged with entering into multiple marriage contracts. So, if and when they are charged with polygamy, what will be the specific offending behavior?
Let's say a guy is married to one woman, with whom he has sexual relations. He also has sex with his live-in maid, with his wife's approval. So far, no laws are being broken. But suppose that one day they guy's buddy comes over, announces himself to the the chief deity and Pope of his own church, and performs an impromptu wedding ceremony on the three sex partners. Are the three from that point onward guilty of polygamy, even though they are living the exact same way as they were the day before, and the marriage ceremony has no legal standing?
I don't mean this as a defense of polygamy, which I oppose wholeheartedly, even in cases where it doesn't involve child sexual abuse. It's just something I've always wondered about the laws against it. What actions exactly constitute the crime? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Senor Magoo He's got a big one

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8700
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | What I'm not clear on is at what point having multiple sexual partners crosses over into polygamy. The "marriages" at Bountiful aren't legally formalized, so they can't be charged with entering into multiple marriage contracts. So, if and when they are charged with polygamy, what will be the specific offending behavior?
|
That's pretty much what I was trying to get at.
You can think of marriage as being two things: the way the spouses interact, and the way the state regards them. Everything about the first part is out of the state's jurisdiction (specifically, how many sexual partners can you have, how many people can you have living under your roof, how many children can you father) and the rest is out of Bountiful's jurisdiction (can my many wives all claim my life insurance, do I have to pay alimony to my fourth wife, can we all file a joint tax return, etc.)
In a sense, it seems like it's primarily polygamy in the elders' heads. _________________ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Senor Magoo wrote: | | Quote: | What I'm not clear on is at what point having multiple sexual partners crosses over into polygamy. The "marriages" at Bountiful aren't legally formalized, so they can't be charged with entering into multiple marriage contracts. So, if and when they are charged with polygamy, what will be the specific offending behavior?
|
That's pretty much what I was trying to get at.
You can think of marriage as being two things: the way the spouses interact, and the way the state regards them. Everything about the first part is out of the state's jurisdiction (specifically, how many sexual partners can you have, how many people can you have living under your roof, how many children can you father) and the rest is out of Bountiful's jurisdiction (can my many wives all claim my life insurance, do I have to pay alimony to my fourth wife, can we all file a joint tax return, etc.)
In a sense, it seems like it's primarily polygamy in the elders' heads |
Yes, until such time as the elders succeed in getting the Canadian government to recognize the multiple sexual partnerships as legal marriages. In which case, it would be actual polygamy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting questions. For me, if Magoo runs an ad in every paper in the nation inviting women to join him for some well cooked meals and a bit of the old laugh'n'tickle I don't much give a damn.
However, if Magoo then has umptymump kids with these women, and the kids are all called This Magoo and That Magoo and Next Magoo and Max Magoo and the women all go on welfare to keep the groceries coming into the house so Magoo can cook (when he can stand on his feet between bedroom forays) I start to get a tad pissed off.
Whether or not the Poop of Rooms has shown up to bless unions.
Then if Magoo and these women start brainwashing these kids that multiplicity is the only way to get into Hebbin, that they will be given halo and wings only depending on how many git they produce...and Magoo's brother Bubba shows up to claim Chastity Magoo who is now twelve and the Poop of Rooms blesses her as Bubba's sixth wife and Chastity winds up a baby machine, and Magoo's next daughter Patience, on reaching the advanced age of eleven or twelve gets taken to Idaho to become wife seventeen of Grandpa Magiggle in exchange from Magiggle's twelve year old daughter by his thirteenth wife (they've run out of names down there so the kid is only called eightyfour) and the Poop of Rooms thinks that's all hunky dory. And then Chastity, who is now eighteen and has five kids runs away from the whole mad pack, makes it into town, claims sanctuary with her run-away aunt and says she never wanted to get married to Bubba but they told her she'd rot in hell if she didn't and by the way she wants her kids...then I want the frikken Horsemen to put down their donuts and go out and get Chastity's kids. Arrest Bubba for carnal knowledge of an unwilling child, and maybe manage to shoot Magoo in the back of the head like they did that laughing kid in the interior last year.
These kids are given very spotty education and only a very few chosen are allowed to go from the Bountiful school into grade eight or so in town. The rest are undereducated, virtually unemployable, and thus denied much choice in life even if they should manage to run away rather than be fucked before they're even fertile.
I'm not a Christian so I don't really give a fat rodent's butt end what brand of whatever they claim to follow. Now that wotzisname has been picked up by the FBI I expect good old portly Winston will do what turds do in a septic tank and rise to the top. He's got a pack of wives and a swarm of kids and thinks it is all very funny that people outside object. He seems to have huge money but his wives are all pulling in hoofare. Except for the ones who work at menial jobs in town and go to work looking as if they just stepped off the wagon train. And even that wouldn't gripe me too much, other than the abuse to the system which never seems to have money for those who truly need it but plenty to subsidize this bullshit. But Winston has admitted on TV he has married girls as young as fourteen.
Personally I'd like to cut his nuts off but I'm sure there are folk would think me violent and out of control. And others who will sharpen the razor for me.
Polygamy doesn't stick in my throat. Brainwashing does, transporting a minor across borders and state lines for the purposes of sex does, and I object strenuously to paying a police force to sit with their heads up their basic fundaments, and even more strenuously object to the attorney general of a province rambling on in circles about bogs all rather than pull out his thumb and do something.
But it's girls and women who are getting fucked, fucked over, fucked up and fucked to a fine fare thee well so of course it doesn't matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The BC government has appointed a special prosecutor to review charges against the Bountiful group.
| Quote: | ... As a result of the investigation, the RCMP made charge recommendations to the Crown last fall and that report was reviewed by four senior lawyers of the Criminal Justice Branch.
But on May 31, the branch received written directions from Attorney General Wally Oppal to look further into all possible criminal charges.
... The branch appointed a special prosecutor to ensure there is no risk of real or perceived improper influence during the assessment of the charges. |
Globe and Mail.
Window-dressing, or will this amount to something? We'll see ... eventually.
I don't get the worry over improper influences. If they're breaking the law and the RCMP wants to lay charges, what's the holdup? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | I don't get the worry over improper influences. If they're breaking the law and the RCMP wants to lay charges, what's the holdup?
|
The link didn't work for me. Did the article say from which quarters the improper influence might be coming from? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I keep forgetting that the Globe has a sign-up thingie (and after a few days articles go behind the subscription wall). No, it didn't say anything about what improper influence might mean ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think they're referring euphemistically to the possibility there will be heavy pressure put on the girls and younger wives to deny that there had been any conditioning or brainwashing involved...
Wally Oppal was on TV last night trying to "explain" and "clear up misconceptions" while as good as wringing his hands and stammering.
Betcha if this was a Muslim enclave there'd be a lot less hesitation and b.s. about religious freedom and rah rah rah.
Hana Gartner has done a couple of quite good doc's on Bountiful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the BC Attorney General says there's not enough evidence to lay sexual assault charges in the Bountiful case.
| Quote: | ... The RCMP investigated allegations of abuse inside the secretive commune in the province's southern Interior, where men have been alleged to marry several women, many of whom are still teenagers.
But in a report released Wednesday, special prosecutor Richard Peck, who was appointed by the B.C. government to make recommendations on charges, has concluded there is not a "substantial likelihood of conviction."
Many of the young women from the community insisted they were the aggressors and initiated sex with the older men, said Oppal.
The B.C. Court of Appeal may now be asked to rule on the validity of Canada's law against multiple marriages, said Oppal. |
CBC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Watching a documentary on Global right now, about how the fundamentalist Mormon church (Fundamentalist Church of the Latter Day Saints) of which Bountiful is a part, affects young men in their polygamous society. It's called Polygamy's Lost Boys.
Interesting and depressing stuff. Pretty disjointed documentary, though. And while sure, it was about the impact on the young men, they didn't really touch at all on the issue of female children being married/raped.
What I didn't know is that unlike the RCMP, the FBI has been quite successful in going after the leader of the American branch of the FCLDS, Warren Jeffs for sexual offenses.
| Quote: | He gained international notoriety in May, 2006 when he was placed on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List for unlawful flight to avoid prosecution on state charges related to his allegedly arranging extralegal "marriages" between his adult male followers and girls who were under the age of majority, the age of consent and/or the legally recognizable marriageable age. Jeffs is believed to have had sexual relations with a minor; in May and July of 2007 the State of Arizona charged him with eight additional counts -- including sexual conduct with minor and incest -- in two separate cases.
Jeffs was arrested near Las Vegas, Nevada on August 28, 2006 after a Nevada Highway Patrol trooper pulled over his burgundy Cadillac Escalade, in which he was a passenger. Jeffs was later extradited to Utah and remains in custody as of April 29, 2007, awaiting prosecution. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | What I didn't know is that unlike the RCMP, the FBI has been quite successful in going after the leader of the American branch of the FCLDS, Warren Jeffs for sexual offenses.
|
Might this be at least partly connected to most American states having a higher age of consent than Canada had when the bulk of the Bountiful assaults were taking place? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From the Status Of Women report:
| Quote: | The Need for Sensitive Enforcement
We believe that Canada's polygamy laws are constitutionally valid, and there continued existence has important symbolic, educational and policy functions. However, aggressive enforcement of the criminal law would not be appropriate, and would be contrary to the interests of the vulnerable women and children who are at present living in polygamous families. Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has noted some of the difficulties in dealing with the much larger Fundamentalist Mormon polygamous community in his state, where the criminal laws against living in polygamous unions are clear and have been held to be constitutionally valid. He observed that dealing with polygamy is not a matter of simply arresting all those who practise it because, if he were to use that approach, 20,000 children in his state would be affected ("Dr. Phil" 2005). While the polygamous communities in Canada are much smaller, a policy of widespread arrests would be devastating for the children of polygamous marriages if it meant that many children would have both parents arrested. Such an aggressive approach would also risk creating a public relations disaster, as occurred in Short Creek, Arizona in 1953.
There are concerns that aggressive investigation and prosecution of polygamy cases might force polygamy further underground, which would make it more difficult to help vulnerable woman and children. Currently, though the Fundamentalist Mormons in Bountiful are private about their affairs, some of them openly admit that they practise polygamy. Arguments have been made that women and children would be better served if polygamy were decriminalized, so polygamous marriages could be better monitored for abuse and exploitation of women and children. Alyssa Rower (2004: 729), an American commentator, has advocated in favour of legalizing polygamy as the most effective way to expose polygamous families to greater scrutiny. She has argued that this would permit, where warranted, prosecution for such criminal activities as child abuse, incest or marriage to an underage "wife." She suggested that legalizing polygamy would mean that "[f]undamentalists could join mainstream society and live under mainstream laws." Even, however, if polygamy were to be decriminalized, polygamists in Fundamentalist Mormon communities are unlikely to become more open and less distrusting of outsiders. As no member of the Fundamentalist Mormon community in Canada has ever been prosecuted for polygamy, it is doubtful that the criminal law has had a major role in causing the community to be secretive.
Aggressive investigation and the enforcement of the Criminal Code polygamy provisions through widespread arrests would be problematic, and would jeopardize the welfare of vulnerable women and children. On the other hand, prosecutions are appropriate in cases where minors have been placed in an arranged polygamous union, or where adult women are coming forward to complain of being forced into a polygamous union. Further, it would be appropriate to prosecute the male community leaders who publicly advocate polygamy, live in polygamous unions and have arranged for women to enter into polygamous marriages with other men in their communities.
Assistance, counselling and support should be provided for women and children who wish to leave their polygamous families, but feel trapped because of their limited financial resources and minimal education. Young adult males who wish to leave, or are forced to leave, these communities also need assistance. In some cases this may involve providing legal assistance so civil and family law remedies (including child support) can be pursued.
The British Columbia government should cease funding any independent school that encourages the practice of polygamy. Already in 1993 the Committee on Polygamous Issues was critical of the Ministry of Education's lack of scrutiny of the Bountiful Secondary-Elementary School. It has been reported that the Ministry only evaluates the Bountiful Secondary-Elementary School during pre-announced visits and through the use of standardized tests for which students can be specially prepared by their teachers. The educational standards at the school appear to be inadequate, and because it is controlled by the community's religious leaders, the school is indoctrinating children and isolating them from the broader society. Media reports have been highly critical of this funding, on the grounds that the school is being used to teach polygamy, sexist and racist attitudes, and that it does not prepare students for life outside that specific community (British Columbia Civil Liberties Assocation 2004; CUPE BC 2004; Bains 2003). As polygamy is illegal, government funding should not be provided for independent schools that encourage this practice.
|
| Quote: | Limited Recognition of Polygamous Marriages
Though parties to a polygamous marriage may be excluded from being sponsored to immigrate to Canada under the Family Class of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, 2001, they have, on occasion been permitted entry on "humanitarian and compassionate" grounds. Though the exact number is unknown, it is also possible that a number of persons living in polygamous unions have gained entry under other grounds or are illegally in Canada.
In Ontario, spouses in polygamous marriages that were validly entered into in foreign countries are given legal recognition for purposes of making statutory claims on death or after separation. This limited recognition of foreign polygamous marriages provides a degree of acceptance for the reality that there are Canadians who are in polygamous marriages, as well as plural wives living in other countries who might make claims against husbands resident in Canada. This provision raises constitutional and political issues about potentially unequal treatment of domestic and foreign polygamous relationships. The provisions of Ontario's Family Law Act and Succession Law Reform Act can only be used by those whose polygamous marriages were celebrated in a foreign jurisdiction that recognizes polygamy, and is therefore unavailable for the protection of those who enter polygamous marriages in Canada or in another jurisdiction that does not permit polygamy. This could be the basis for an argument by Canadian polygamists that they are denied protection relating to property and spousal support that is available to persons who were party to a polygamous marriage, but who married in a foreign state that recognizes the validity of such marriages. Further, this provision would allow those who entered into polygamous marriages in foreign countries to benefit from a practice that is outlawed by Canada's Criminal Code. In our view, however, these differences in treatment are constitutionally and politically justified on the ground that this is consistent with principles of private international law about establishing the validity of a marriage, and it is a fair resolution to the problems inherent in international differences in marriage laws. It is also necessary to protect vulnerable women and children who relied on the laws of the jurisdiction where the polygamous marriage was performed and that likely does not violate the Charter or strengthen claims within Canada to challenge s. 293 of the Criminal Code.
Apart from Ontario legislation, statutory schemes that allow claims by "unmarried spouses" (often called "common law spouses" in Canada) for such purposes as family law, succession and such social benefits as the Canada Pension Plan are limited to relationships involving two partners. There may, however, be Charter-based arguments to interpret such laws to recognize limited claims from polygamous wives to protect vulnerable women. These arguments would be more likely to succeed if seen as protecting vulnerable women (i.e., under the equality provisions of s. 15 of the Charter) than if made on the broader basis of recognizing polygamy (i.e., under the religious freedom provisions of s. 2 of the Charter). A woman who could establish that she was coerced to enter and remain in such a relationship would also have a stronger argument. If such arguments are accepted, benefits would presumably have to be divided on a per capita basis to protect all the wives, without imposing unfair burdens on an estate or the government.
There may also be limited circumstances in which a woman who lived in a polygamous union in Canada, such as a Fundamentalist Mormon marriage, can claim certain limited rights arising from the union. One would certainly expect that if a Canadian court had jurisdiction over a case involving a claim to child support by a wife in a polygamous relationship, she would be entitled to succeed, as child support claims do not depend on marriage. Further, property claims that are intended to recognize contributions to the acquisition or maintenance of property without regard to marital status (such as the constructive trust) should succeed; the husband should not be able to rely on the fact that this was an illegal union to deny this type of equitable relief to recognize contributions.
Preventing the formation of any new polygamous relationships is an important goal, but the reality is that there are women and children in Canada living in these relationships, or may be living in other countries and want to make claims against "husbands" in Canada. It is submitted that the American cases that have dealt with issues related to individual children have taken the correct approach. The fact that a mother is living in a polygamous relationship should be viewed as a negative but not determinative factor in making a decision based on the best interests of a child; these decisions require consideration of all the child's circumstances. Limited recognition of polygamous marriages, for example for inheritance purposes, is appropriate, but Canadian law should, in general, not recognize polygamous marriage.
Recommendations to the Federal Government
As long as polygamy remains a criminal offence, it should be retained as a basis for excluding immigrants.
Recommendations to the Federal and Provincial Governments and the Courts
As there may be refugees and others in Canada who are in polygamous relationships, in appropriate civil cases (e.g., inheritance) the law should offer limited recognition of rights to protect the vulnerable women and children who have lived in polygamous relationships. There may also be vulnerable individuals in polygamous relationships who reside overseas and should be entitled to seek limited relief in Canadian courts against a partner who resides in Canada. A primary concern in deciding how to deal with participants in polygamous unions is that the vulnerable should not be penalized and the innocent should not be stigmatized or revictimized.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wikipedia on the Short Creek Raid...
| Quote: | Just before dawn on July 26, 1953, 102 Arizona state police officers and soldiers from the National Guard entered Short Creek. The community—which was composed of approximately 400 Mormon fundamentalists—had been tipped off about the planned raid and were found singing hymns in the schoolhouse while the children played outside. The entire community was taken into custody, with the exception of six individuals who were found to not be fundamentalist Mormons.[2] Among those taken into custody were 236 children. One hundred and fifty of the children who were taken into custody were not permitted to return to their parents for over two years, and some parents never did regain custody of their children.[3]
|
| Quote: | | One of the few media outlets to applaud the raid was the Salt Lake City-based Deseret News, which was owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.[12] The News applauded the action as a needed response to prevent the fundamentalists from becoming "a cancer of a sort that is beyond hope of human repair."[13] When the paper later editorialized its support for separating children from their polygamist parents, there was a backlash against the paper and the church by a number of Latter-day Saints, including Juanita Brooks, who complained that the church organ was approving of "such a basically cruel and wicked thing as the taking of little children from their mother."[8] The Short Creek raid was the last action against polygamous Mormon fundamentalists that has been actively supported by the LDS Church.[14] |
| Quote: | After the Short Creek raid, the Mormon polygamist colony at Short Creek eventually rejuvenated. Short Creek was renamed Colorado City in 1960. In 1991, the Mormon fundamentalists at Colorado City formally established the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The members of the sect did not face any prosecutions for its polygamous behavior until the late 1990s, when isolated individuals began to be prosecuted.[15] In 2006, FLDS Church leader Warren Jeffs was placed on the FBI Ten Most Wanted List; he was arrested in 2007 and is awaiting trial on charges relating to sex crimes against minors.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Creek_raid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Utah and Arizona Attorney-General's have produced a joint manual on dealing with domestic abuse in polygamous families. Slate has it archived.
http://www.slate.com/id/2174061/entry/2174062/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Warren Jeffs has been found guilty.
| Quote: | ST. GEORGE, Utah - A jury convicted polygamous-sect leader Warren Jeffs of rape-by-accomplice charges for his role in the arranged marriage of a 14-year-old girl and her older cousin.
The charges carry up to life in prison.
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20974526/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the US isn't finished with this perv. And right now B.C. is supposed to be looking into the possibility of laying charges against some of the top crew at Bountiful.
I guess I wouldn't feel as negative if the women had any real choice in things but how can they have informed choice when they're as good as cloistered and brainwashed daily that the only way they will get to heaven is if they conform?
By me, if adult women prefer to share a man, well, hey, where does any of that impact me or involve me? But some of the TV documentary footage I've seen about Bountiful is really enraging. Kids who probably don't even fully understand "the birds and the bees" parroting the dogma of plurality...it's creepy-making. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | ELDORADO, Texas - Child welfare officials following up on an abuse complaint took custody of 18 girls who lived at a secretive West Texas religious retreat built by polygamist leader Warren Jeffs.
A total of 52 girls, ages 6 months to 17 years, were bused away on Friday to be interviewed, but only 18 were immediately taken into state custody, said Texas Child Protective Services spokeswoman Marleigh Meisner. No arrests had been made.
|
| Quote: | 16-year-old giving birth?
On Friday afternoon, the Department of Public Safety officials began executing a search warrant.
The warrant seeks records dealing with the birth of children to a 16-year-old and any records listing a marriage between a 50-year-old man and the girl, according to the San Angelo Standard-Times, which cited court records released late Friday in Tom Green County. Prosecutors in Tom Green, a larger county north of Eldorado, were handling the case.
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23958307/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't know Jeffs had built another compound in Texas ... pretty far-ranging tentacles.
| Quote: | | Before his 2006 arrest, Jeffs had last been seen on January 1, 2005, near Eldorado, Texas, at the dedication ceremony of the foundation of a large and elaborate new FLDS temple on an area of land called the YFZ Ranch. The media reported that Jeffs' church has designated or will soon designate the area as its new home base. |
Wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
transplant Starting Over Again
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 1710 Location: somewhere between here and there
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tehanu wrote: | | I didn't know Jeffs had built another compound in Texas ... pretty far-ranging tentacles. |
Oh, my bad. For some reason I originally read that as "...far ranging testicles." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tehanu More or less, more or less

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 17673 Location: Seceded from the Ford Nation
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tee hee. Well, that too, probably. You should post that on that "Who needs glasses" thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are things about this whole Jeffs-polygamy thing which really worry me. Jeffs has followers in Bountiful, B.C., and that has caused a huge split in the followers, some of whom are loyal to Jeff and some of whom are loyal to Winston Blackwell.
It's been known for decades that there was a polygamous colony in Bountiful, and each government, including the NDP, has chosen to do nothing at all about the many reports of forced marriage, incest, and child sexual abuse.
I think it was CTV did a documentary of "the boys of bountiful", kids with minimal literacy skills turfed out of the colony, often for no real reason at all. They wind up "in town", and are fish out of water, in a foreign culture, with no real employment chances. And there are stories and rumours of some who just vanished...
but investigation isn't energetic and charges don't get laid and when asked why the squirming and verbal wriggling of the Attorney general is almost comical, except it's so sad, really.
I think nobody wants to take this on and press charges because they're afraid the courts will decide there really is no basis for any law against polygamy. And if they lose that one, well...
And since it is girls and women who are most subjugated by the fundamentalist teachings of this group we can be sure little will be done.
It brings up, I think, the question of WHY we even pretend there's a law against polygamy. If everyone involved is of legal age, and if that's what they choose as a way of life, I don't see where any of it is my business.
It's when girls of thirteen are given no choice that I get a bit fraught. And when girls are forced into marriage with their own uncles and cousins, with old men who already have a dozen wives and sixty kids...but those concerns are something separate from "polygamy". That's wingnut sick! Polygamy doesn't have to be part of or lead to such abuses.
Obviously, no one wage earner is going to bring in enough $$ to support twenty children. Some of the wives get outside jobs but in some colonies the main source of income is welfare. Which means we're all supporting the lifestyle.
Which means I'd rather do that than cancel welfare because too many people who really need it would suffer.
We have long considered Canada to be a place where diversity is welcome, and I think most people really do believe that but we haven't really done a good job of examining what diversity really is , nor have we done much to protect the ones with least choice.
I do believe that if Bountiful, and other places like it, were Muslim, Sikh, Hindu or Buddhist compounds the arm of the law would get its finger out of it's arse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Obviously, no one wage earner is going to bring in enough $$ to support twenty children. Some of the wives get outside jobs but in some colonies the main source of income is welfare. Which means we're all supporting the lifestyle.
|
In the April edition of Harper's, there is a re-print of a manual used by US government agents who investigate polygamous communities. The manual contains definitions of the phrases used by polygamists. Apparently, they have a phrase that refers to living off government support while at the same time condemning the government as evil. "Stealing from the beast", or something like that. Apparently, they justify themselves by saying that they're helping to undermine the evil government by taking its money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Senor Magoo He's got a big one

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8700
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Apparently, they have a phrase that refers to living off government support while at the same time condemning the government as evil. "Stealing from the beast", or something like that. Apparently, they justify themselves by saying that they're helping to undermine the evil government by taking its money. |
Are you sure you're not mixing them up with Anarchists and other radicals who want to smash the state (but let's wait until after cheque day)?  _________________ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fork Utensil

Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1283 Location: Left . . . of the plate
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Last weekend's G & M had a book review of:
THE SECRET LIVES OF SAINTS: Child Brides and Lost Boys in Canada's Polygamous Mormon Sect
By Daphne Bramham
The reviewer, Dawn Rae Downton:
| Quote: | | Blackmore has a mere 26 wives and 115-plus children. But he's laughing all the way to the bank. Unpaid child and spousal labour, tithing from the faithful and government handouts (including more than $1-million annually for his school, which blithely ignores the provincial curriculum) have made him a multimillionaire. |
Regarding the funding of the school, a women's centre claimed it was illegal back in 2003. But the gov't disagreed:
| Quote: | Kate Thompson, a spokeswoman for the B.C. Education Ministry, said the government is legally obligated to fund Bountiful, the same as with other independent schools that pass an assessment.
"If it qualifies and they're eligible under the B.C. legislation, it's no different from any other independent school in that regard," Thompson said. |
More details about meeting the education requirements from Bramham in this January, 2008 article:
| Quote: | It was only one of myriad problems, including breaches of the basic requirements of the Independent School Act. According to documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, two of the five teachers didn't have accreditation. Criminal records checks had not been done on half the staff. Students in Grades 4 and 7 did not take the required Foundation Skills Assessment tests.
What the ministry's evaluators concluded last February was that there was no way to tell what, if anything, the 14 students in Grades 8 and 9 were learning. . .
For English, math, science and social studies, students used course materials purchased from Kelowna-based ProActive Curriculum Ltd.
Inspectors found no evidence that the courses met the ministry's prescribed learning outcomes.
The Spanish course, one hour of instruction a week or about 35 hours in the school year, is a third of what the ministry requires. Art was taught only two hours a week. French was graded as a simple pass-fail, as was physical education, which had a limited scope because the school doesn't have a gymnasium.
The computer lab has 20 computers, but no Internet connection. Students were were taught keyboarding, but the teacher wasn't qualified to teach the course.
The school used the Web-based version of the old health and career education program. But as the inspection report drily noted, "As the school is not connected to the Web, this is problematic in a number of respects."
(Previous evaluations were highly critical of how the career education program was delivered. Girls' only career choices were cooking, cleaning and child-minding.)
When inspectors looked at Grade 8 and 9 students' report cards, they were "virtually identical reports." How other students are doing is also unclear.
The Grade 7 teacher didn't keep any assessment records. Students kept their tests and assignments in a binder and when report cards were due, the teacher reviewed the binders and assigned a grade.
Only one Grade 7 student and two Grade 4 pupils wrote the required Foundation Skills Assessment tests. Evaluators were told that parents refused permission for their children to take the tests because of ads in the local paper by the "Concerned Teachers of the Cranbrook Teachers' Association" advising students not to take the tests because they have "many negative effects on teaching and learning." . . .
Despite all the problems, Mormon Hills School retains Group 1 accreditation and funding for its Grades 1-7 programs. It succeeded in qualifying for Group 3 accreditation for Grades 8 and 9, which means it currently gets no funds for those programs but is on track to get Group 1 certification and funding. And it is seeking Group 3 status for its new Grade 10 program.
It retains those certifications even though the community makes no secret of the fact that children are taught that unless they practise the criminal offence of polygamy, they will not get to the highest realm of heaven. The school has the government seal of approval even though its students are taught strict obedience to their leaders in everything, including whom and when to marry.
Why? Because beyond the requirements to teach the provincial curriculum, the only limits the B.C. Independent School Act places on schools is that they "must not offer programs that in theory or in practice will promote or foster doctrines of racial or ethnic superiority or persecution, religious intolerance or persecution, social change through violent action, or sedition."
|
Isn't meeting basic requirements for teaching curriculum a black and white thing? Either you are or you aren't. If you aren't, funding should be withdrawn, and the province has a duty to ensure that the children are educated to at least minimum standards. I notice that Thompson of the Education Ministry said, "if it qualifies", not that it did.
Al Capone went down for tax evasion, not racketeering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | ELDORADO, Texas - Officials on Monday announced that 534 women and children — more than twice as many as had been earlier reported — were removed from a polygamist compound and that all 401 children have been placed in state custody because a judge deemed them in imminent danger of physical abuse.
State police earlier made an arrest as they searched the sprawling rural compound built by polygamist leader Warren Jeffs during an investigation into a possible underage marriage.
Department of Public Safety spokesman Tom Vinger said the person arrested was not Dale Barlow, the man listed in warrants related to the marriage of an underage girl. The person was charged with interfering with officials, but Vinger said he had no other details.
|
The article has a photo, plus some video footage, showing female members dressed in fairly distinctive old-style garb.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23993440/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Al Capone went down for tax evasion, not racketeering. |
If you're suggesting that we get these guys on some sort of violation of the education laws, I'm not sure if that would work. According to the Globe article you posted, the school is basically approved by the government. So how can we arrest people for doing things that the government has given them permission to do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
granny Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 217
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since they said the women and children were "in imminent danger of physical abuse", sounds like there might be enough there to warrant plenty of criminal investigations, I hope.
To my knowledge, schools can be decertified, but more often there are attempts to 'work with them' to meet the requirements instead. The only time charges against guardians apply is when children are 'truant' (not 'captive').
I suppose if you decertified the school, then the kids would be 'truant'. Hmm.
However, it seems in this case the young woman blew the whistle. Kudos to her for courage, but where is she? She would be in great danger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess there's a lot of desert around that place. Lots of room for unmarked graves. And no, I do not think that is over-reaction. Not with this bunch, followers of Warren Jeffs, who is really one very sick pup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | VANCOUVER - There's no point in criminally charging alleged abusers in B.C.'s polygamous community of Bountiful until the courts rule on the constitutionality of polygamy itself, a senior Vancouver lawyer has concluded.
"(This) is not an attempt to dodge or delay dealing with the problems in Bountiful," Leonard Doust wrote in a special report to the ministry of Attorney General, made public Monday. "On the contrary, it is the swiftest, most effective and fairest way of beginning to address them."
Doust's opinion represents the second time a lawyer hired by the government has recommended the constitutionality of the polygamy law be tested in court.
|
| Quote: | In response, New Democratic Party attorney general critic Leonard Krog said prosecution is the only answer.
"You cannot tell me the average British Columbian is pleased by the prospect of a continuation of the sexual exploitation of children in this province under the guise of polygamy and religious freedom," he said.
"A prosecution would send a message that we find it absolutely unacceptable in British Columbia to have children being married off to old men," he added.
|
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=8196bbd4-a... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fork Utensil

Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1283 Location: Left . . . of the plate
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| voice of the damned wrote: | | If you're suggesting that we get these guys on some sort of violation of the education laws, I'm not sure if that would work. According to the Globe article you posted, the school is basically approved by the government. So how can we arrest people for doing things that the government has given them permission to do? |
I was thinking more of wedging a foot in the door. The Bountiful system is dependent on a steady supply of ignorant and powerless girls, so isolation from the larger world and its potential and alternative viewpoints is key.
What I got from the articles I posted is that the women's centre, in calling the school illegal, was focusing on polygamy, and the gov't official ran with it:
| Quote: | | "There's the contrast between what our legal obligation is under the Independent Schools Act and what people's concerns are over the moral questions and the legal questions involved in polygamy, which is quite separate from what the ministry is mandated for." |
But if we set aside the polygamy question, and simply look at whether they meet the minimum education requirements, that's not so clear. And the info that Bramham obtained in January of this year looks pretty damning. The Foundation Skills Assessment tests were required, so how can Bountiful refuse testing? How can the Ministry say the school qualifies when "(i)nspectors found no evidence that the courses met the ministry's prescribed learning outcomes" and they can't even ascertain "what, if anything, the 14 students in Grades 8 and 9 were learning"?
If the January 08 article is accurate, funding for the school should be withdrawn immediately. Bountiful would have to, at the very least, educate some of its own people to accreditation level. In the meantime, there's children to be schooled, which would necessitate intervention. Wiki says that "Education is compulsory up to the age of 16 in every province in Canada, except for Ontario and New Brunswick, where the compulsory age is 18." And while there would still be women that would choose this lifestyle, I think Bountiful would be a much smaller sect. And much poorer, with the loss of gov't funding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Senor Magoo He's got a big one

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8700
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | "A prosecution would send a message that we find it absolutely unacceptable in British Columbia to have children being married off to old men," he added.
|
I think this thread should be merged with the "Harper's bigoted age of consent law" thread.
I seem to recall it being asserted that the idea of 14 year olds and 50 year olds getting together was just a far fetched straw man, so maybe all of this is just a tempest in a teapot. The Bountiful folk are just standing up to Harper and his army of prudes, and that's a good thing, right? _________________ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cartman Beyond cuddly

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8676 Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I seem to recall it being asserted that the idea of 14 year olds and 50 year olds getting together was just a far fetched straw man, so maybe all of this is just a tempest in a teapot. |
I don't think anybody argued that sexual abuse of girls is non-existent in Canada. I do recall the argument that raising the age of consent would have a negligible impact upon such abuse. Regardless of the age of consent, many girls are going to be sexually exploited. In these cases, the perpetrators were more than willing to violate existing laws as they did not fear them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cartman Beyond cuddly

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8676 Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| And there is also the concern that raising the age of consent might make abused people more reluctant to seek out information and help from authorities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fork Utensil

Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1283 Location: Left . . . of the plate
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | "A prosecution would send a message that we find it absolutely unacceptable in British Columbia to have children being married off to old men," he added. |
That's the NDP attorney general critic Leonard Krog talking, not the authors of the report.
The report dealt with polygamy, not marriage/sex with children, so it's hard to see how a polygamy prosecution would send that message. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anne cameron Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 3142 Location: tahsis, british columbia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Putting aside any question of polygamy, and ignoring the obvious truth that if this was Muslim, Sikh or any other non-Xian group engaged in polygamy the wheels would turn damn fast... but putting that aside it is still obvious that , in B.C. , at least, the government doesn't want to do anything.
Girls from Canada are taken over the border to be married to old geezers in the USA, and girls from the USA are brought to Canada to be handed over to old geezers up here...and it's against the US law to transport a female over state lines for sexual or immoral purposes...and to get welfare these folks have to register the births of their kids...and it isn't rocket science math to put 14 years here and one month there and figure that ten months ago this mom was thirteen and hubby is an old geezer and...
it could be done. But they aren't making any move to do any of it. And I do believe that it's because it's girls and women who are being most abused.
The stories told by women who have run away from Bountiful ought to be in and of themselves sufficient "evidence" for charges to be laid.
Winston Blackheart laughed and admitted that he just might have married some underage girls, but yuk yuk he hadn't really checked their birth certificates, har har.
Oh he's a jolly old soul is Winston.
I really don't give a hoot in hell if a woman has six husbands or a man has six wives. I don't care if a woman has six wives and a man has six husbands, either. I do, however, prefer and even insist that all concerned be adults, with free will.
I mean it's not as if there are any horses out in the streets to be frightened any more.
It's the oppression, the abuse, and the lack of choice sticks sideways in my throat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cartman Beyond cuddly

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 8676 Location: OMG! They killed Jason Kenney!
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Girls from Canada are taken over the border to be married to old geezers in the USA, and girls from the USA are brought to Canada to be handed over to old geezers up here.
But they aren't making any move to do any of it. And I do believe that it's because it's girls and women who are being most abused.
|
Well, I totally agree, but I suspect that many people would not although they might not protest. I suspect that when people talk about pedophilia, they think gay Catholic priest and boys despite considerable evidence to the contrary. That is, most pedophiles are heterosexual males molesting girls. De-gendering the issue is problematic because it draws attention and resources away from the reality of the situation. Ironically anne, we both know that this is done in the name of "equality". Sadly, our current federal government thinks we already have equality between males and females and programs for women require further cuts (assuming there are any programs left before long). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fork wrote: | | Quote: | | "A prosecution would send a message that we find it absolutely unacceptable in British Columbia to have children being married off to old men," he added. |
That's the NDP attorney general critic Leonard Krog talking, not the authors of the report.
The report dealt with polygamy, not marriage/sex with children, so it's hard to see how a polygamy prosecution would send that message. |
This sort of confusion seems to permeate the whole discussion.
| Quote: | VANCOUVER - There's no point in criminally charging alleged abusers in B.C.'s polygamous community of Bountiful until the courts rule on the constitutionality of polygamy itself, a senior Vancouver lawyer has concluded.
|
If it's "abusers" who would be charged, then I assume the charges would relate to abuse, which, in this context, I would take to mean sex with underaged people. But then in the same paragraph, the writer says that the constitutionality of polygamy is the problem facing prosecutors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cartman wrote: | | Quote: | | I seem to recall it being asserted that the idea of 14 year olds and 50 year olds getting together was just a far fetched straw man, so maybe all of this is just a tempest in a teapot. |
I don't think anybody argued that sexual abuse of girls is non-existent in Canada. I do recall the argument that raising the age of consent would have a negligible impact upon such abuse. Regardless of the age of consent, many girls are going to be sexually exploited. In these cases, the perpetrators were more than willing to violate existing laws as they did not fear them. |
Well, it was argued by at least one poster that the new law would be bad because it would prevent a 15 year old from having consensual sex with a 21 year old.
VOTD/TS exchange:
| Quote: | | Could you give me a concrete illustration of how this law undermines youth legally? I mean, a specific example of a legitimate activity that a youth may wish to do, but will be unable to because of this law. |
| Quote: | A fifteen year old might wish to have a fully consensual relationship with a 21 year old. Under current laws, that would be legal, so long as the relationship did not have exploitative qualities on the criteria in the criminal code. Under the new legislation that would be flat out illegal.
|
I didn't re-read the rest of the thread, but I don't recall any of the people opposed to raising the age disagree with TS's implied acceptance of the 15/21 relationship. And I have no strong opinions about it myself. But if people ARE going to defend the legal validity of such a relationship, then they have no real legal basis to criticize a 50-year old man for doing the same thing with a 15-year old girl.
http://enmasse.ca/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2826&postdays=0&postorder=...
Our exchange is at the very top of the page. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rufus Polson Purple Library Guy
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 3483 Location: SFU and/or the college of Riddlemastery at Caithnard
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Bountiful thing ain't about age of consent. It's about exploitation by people in positions of authority, which current law bans regardless of "age of consent" laws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voice of the damned Fulltime enMasse Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 6195 Location: slandered, libeled
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The Bountiful thing ain't about age of consent. It's about exploitation by people in positions of authority, which current law bans regardless of "age of consent" laws. |
Well, I understand that if a teacher, say, has sex with a student, that's exploitation, because the teacher is in a clearly defined position of authority over the student. He gives assignments, hands out grades, etc.
But can the same be said about all of the men of Bountiful? Did they all have some recognizable position of authority over the girls they were marrying? Presumably, their defense lawyers would be quite keen to argue for days on end about what does and does not constitute a position of authority in this particular context.
Whereas if the men were being tried for violating the age of consent laws, no such legal wrangling need take place. You could haul out the girls' birth certificates, prove that they were born on such and such a date, and the sex took place before they had reached the age of consent, and pretty much wrap up the case with that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|